Einstein made many observations about our solar system.
- Image via Wikipedia
Having read the book “The Bible Code” thanks to my good friend Claire from York, my conclusions are somewhat as controversial as The bible code itself.
Too much time is spent discussing the same subjects,and to use a nuclear holocaust as a prediction as to how the world will end in reference to Armageddon in Revelation, is all too predictable for a book written in the nineteen nineties.
There must be enough similarities between the Hebrew version of the Bible, and the English version of the bible to show some of the so called coded predictions in each of the versions, as there cannot be too many words that do not transfer, otherwise the task would never have been achieved in the first place.
Although it might not show up in the same context, there would be a way to compare the code in the given texts to show where the words arise from. Why has this not been done, and only the Hebrew version used as an example, especially when very few folk speak or understand the Hebrew language now.
If I, or someone else wrote this book now, only a decade later, I, or they, could construe the letters in the bible to tell of incidents that have already occurred, such as the “twin towers catastrophe,” as the way the letters in the Hebrew version, has no real pattern, with the words being formed from letters at random. There are a few examples that are similar, but not enough to be convincing.
The thing that hit me most was the fact that the writer leaves an escape route in case the predictions he made for the years after the books first publication did not come to fruition.
What I mean by an escape route is, he makes a prediction, shows you the code, then gives us a reason why it might be wrong.
If he was so confident that the code really was in the bible there would be no need for any doubts or excuses.
That is just my opinion, but it brings me to the point I wanted to make in the first place.
Quantum Physics, although using certain scientific calculations, also leaves room for error, or as I have called it an escape route, to save face should their theories be proved wrong in the future.
Stephen Hawking’s “Brief history of time” is a theory, and just because it is logical, does not make it right, it has still to be proved right, and will remain a theory until proved otherwise.
Although Einstein made many observations about our solar system, he died leaving theories that have still to be proven today, but some of our scientist take them as fact and make important calculations using them, then IF Einstein is proved to be wrong someday their conclusions from these calculations will be wrong also.
“The distinction between past present and future is only an illusion” is one of Einstein’s theories, also the one that made him famous, is obvious by its name “THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY” theory being the operative word.
How many calculations have been made from “The theory of relativity” and it has still to be proved to be correct?
If it ever comes to light (nice pun) that this theory on the speed of light is wrong, which I am not suggesting IS wrong, then all the calculations will be wrong.
What I am suggesting though, is the assumption that as light travels through space the images we see from our telescopes on earth, means that the source of the light we are looking at happened so many light years ago.
We are misusing Einstein’s theory, omitting the fact that you need the source of the light to still be active in its visual form, if it is being sighted as such.
Light does travel, and light, and the energy emitted from other galaxies reaches earth, and as it travels it widens and disperses throughout the parts of the universe it travels through, introducing the energy back into the universe.
The image of the source of the light, or the object itself, does not travel through the universe, only it’s light and energy, WE are reaching out to that image, therefore the source is still active.
If you take away the source of the light then you just have the light, and energy from that source travelling through space without form, and no visual sighting of the now defunct planet or galaxy.
The idea that what Hubble is seeing as it reaches farther out in space, is planets and galaxies that were formed at the beginning of the universe just after the “big bang” and that the light reflected in Hubble’s mirror are events that took place then, is a wrong assumption, simply because as I said, “you need the source to be still active to be able to see the image”
Proof of this is the fact that Hubble is getting closer images of these forming galaxies, and dieing stars and the image remains the same, no matter how close a picture it takes.
If my theory was wrong, it would mean that when Hubble ‘s closer images came through there would be changes to that image even though it is only magnified.
What I am trying to relate is, the closer Hubble gets, the less light years there are between images, therefore the image should change, but it does not, because the source of light is still there, what Hubble is seeing now, is happening now, and until that realization hits the scientists who hope to view events from the big bang, then they will make wrong assumptions, and calculations.
I have touched on this subject before, and my theory is, “you need the source of the light to be active in solid form to project the images we are now recieving from hubble, therefore these Galaxies are forming now, and the dieing stars are still in the process of dieing”
If I am wrong, and we could span all those light years, at what point would we go through the image of a dieing star and reach the void, or the image of the forming Galaxy to reach it fully formed and in working order, and why would the light energy from a dead star reflect as we see it and not disperse as light energy throughout space, as light does?
It only takes one factual discovery to blow a theory right out of the water, and it wouldn’t be the first time it happened in science.
Which brings me to my next post “TIME” and the way we measure it, and its relevance to this post, but as I say “that is for next week.”
Related articles by Zemanta
- Why We Need to Reach the Stars (and We Will) [Space] (gizmodo.com)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=0244b264-6e85-4689-9376-9ef5855a4e49)
Tags: BIG BANG, Brief History of Time, Einstein, Speed of light, Stephen Hawking, Theory of relativity
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:54 am
Terrific piece you have prepared here! The web is overflowing of bad authorship and I was grabbed by your lucidity. Your determinations are dead-on and I will straightaway subscribe to your rss feed to remain up to date with your up future postings. Yes! I acknowledge it, your authorship style is fabulous and i will now work harder on improving mine.
December 24th, 2009 at 4:51 am
Hi Damion,I must thank you for your positive comment, and for taking the time to both read and comment on my views.
My blog http://unfeatheredangels.blogspot.com/ is my main blog on this subject, but it needs to be read from the first post through to the end to get the whole picture.
I would be interested in your opinion on that if you can find time to read it.
I am quite sure your own blog won”t need much improving, but I will certainly have a read.
Cheers for now, hope to converse again.
March 25th, 2010 at 6:31 am
It is improbable.
March 25th, 2010 at 5:31 pm
If the source was not there only light projecting from it we or more to the point “HUBBLE” could not magnify it.
When observed by magnification we would see past the light projected if the source had died or altered but we don”t.
June 18th, 2011 at 2:52 am
z7Xnnl denkpdejlnou, [url= [link=
June 20th, 2011 at 3:46 am
Deference to op , some fantastic entropy.
July 1st, 2011 at 7:39 pm
“
July 2nd, 2011 at 7:24 pm
I must admit this post is very wonderful . Thanks once again for the push!
July 3rd, 2011 at 8:39 pm
Massachusetts Ethics committee investigating Dan Rizzo
July 10th, 2011 at 12:53 am
Thanks for sharing superb informations. Your web site is so cool. I am impressed by the details that you”ve on this web site. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my pal, ROCK! I found just the info I already searched all over the place and just could not come across. What a great site.
July 11th, 2011 at 2:17 am
I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site listing and can be checking again soon. Pls check out my web page as well and let me know what you think.
July 30th, 2011 at 4:04 am
Quality piece of writing. I don”t quite totally agree with all you”ve went over, but you unquestionably have some great points in there.
August 16th, 2011 at 1:19 pm
Thanks so much for your post!
August 21st, 2011 at 12:47 pm
I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you design this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz respond as I”m looking to construct my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from. cheers
August 22nd, 2011 at 6:20 pm
Wow! That”s an out of the ordinary slant.
August 31st, 2011 at 9:49 am
Nicely mentioned and with excellent timing
August 31st, 2011 at 1:03 pm
Nice web site you got right here, very awesome and great subject matter. Many thanks!
September 21st, 2011 at 2:09 pm
I like this blog layout . How do you make it? Its so sweet!
September 22nd, 2011 at 4:11 am
I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider worries that they just do not know about.
September 28th, 2011 at 6:15 am
Hi there, You”ve done an incredible job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am confident they”ll be benefited from this site.
October 5th, 2011 at 8:12 am
I am glad that i found this web site through my search “google reklam ver”.
October 16th, 2011 at 6:37 pm
Do you have a spam issue on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation; many of us have created some nice procedures and we are looking to swap strategies with other folks, be sure to shoot me an email if interested.
October 17th, 2011 at 3:42 pm
Very good theme. Would you mind giving me the name of theme you use? Google Reklam Ver
October 17th, 2011 at 5:03 pm
Off topic but very interesting template. Would you mind giving me name of template ? Btw i searched on google “temizlik sirketleri antalya” and found myself here in a way
October 17th, 2011 at 7:38 pm
This web site is stunning. All infromation i need is just right here. Reached this site via “google reklam ver”
October 19th, 2011 at 10:44 am
I will right away grab your rss feed as I can”t find your email subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you”ve any? Please let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.
October 19th, 2011 at 4:52 pm
I was recommended this blog by my cousin. I”m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my trouble. You”re amazing! Thanks!
October 22nd, 2011 at 5:30 am
Heya! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing several weeks of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any solutions to protect against hackers?
October 25th, 2011 at 10:06 pm
I was suggested this web site via my cousin. I”m not positive whether or not this put up is written by him as no one else understand such specified approximately my difficulty. You”re wonderful! Thanks!
October 29th, 2011 at 4:40 am
Im impressed, I ought to say. Incredibly hardly ever do I come across a weblog thats each informative and entertaining, and let me tell you, youve hit the nail on the head. Your weblog is vital; the problem is one thing that not sufficient individuals are talking intelligently about. Im definitely pleased that I stumbled across this in my search for some thing relating to this issue.
November 1st, 2011 at 9:06 am
It is truly fun for me to study the information.Be grateful for it. I for example such content and would for instance to study a lot of soon.
November 1st, 2011 at 8:08 pm
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly comeback.
November 2nd, 2011 at 3:45 am
autokary.org.pl…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Einstein made many observations about our solar system.[...]…
November 2nd, 2011 at 4:01 am
I feel this is among the so much important info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few common issues, The site taste is great, the articles is really great : D. Just right activity, cheers
November 2nd, 2011 at 6:04 am
Günlük Hit Tıkla Kazan artık çok kolay google 1. sayfa google robotu…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Einstein made many observations about our solar system.[...]…
November 2nd, 2011 at 2:18 pm
It was truly fascinating to scan and look through this post, I didn”t know anything at all about this before. Gives thanks!
November 2nd, 2011 at 9:26 pm
If you can treat your page rank high and low
as the impostors that they are
and concentrate your efforts on your blog
then you”ll be a man, my son never fear.
November 3rd, 2011 at 9:37 am
armatura łazienkowa…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Einstein made many observations about our solar system.[...]…
November 3rd, 2011 at 7:48 pm
solar panels cornwall…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Einstein made many observations about our solar system.[...]…
November 4th, 2011 at 6:23 am
Im impressed, I have to say. Really rarely do I come across a blog thats both informative and entertaining, and let me tell you, youve hit the nail on the head. Your blog is essential; the issue is one thing that not adequate people are talking intelligently about. Im definitely pleased that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this concern.
November 5th, 2011 at 9:10 pm
home solar systems…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Einstein made many observations about our solar system.[...]…
November 6th, 2011 at 6:47 am
DIY Solar Water Heater…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Einstein made many observations about our solar system.[...]…
November 6th, 2011 at 7:40 am
Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to mention that I have really loved browsing your weblog posts. In any case I”ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write once more soon!
November 7th, 2011 at 7:34 am
Thanks for this unique article. I especially enjoyed reviewing it and ought to discuss it with everyone.
November 9th, 2011 at 5:54 am
Perhaps you have had considered introducing far more videos towards your websites to help keep your readers more entertained? I mean Someone said within the article of yours and it also was quite smart consider Im much more of a visual learner,I came across that to be more helpful well let me know how it similar! I love what you guys will almost always be up too. Such smart work and coverage!
November 10th, 2011 at 3:50 am
Or even taken into account adding more extra films to your web sites to remain readers more interested? Come on, man Someone said within the article of yours plus it was quite excellent question Im even more of a visual learner,I came across that to be more helpful well tell me the actual way it works out! I love what you guys are invariably up too. Such ingenious work and canceling!
November 11th, 2011 at 4:25 am
I need to thank you so much for this informative study, I in reality appreciate sharing this type of good information.
November 11th, 2011 at 7:24 am
Visitor Recomendtions……
[...]The content described in this posting is some of the most useful we come across.[...]…
November 12th, 2011 at 7:03 am
I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this site. Thanks , I will try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your web site?
November 18th, 2011 at 12:31 am
Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for. I bookmarked this blog a while ago because of the useful content and I am never being disappointed. Keep up the good work Just I want to say: Thank you!
November 19th, 2011 at 6:07 am
Hi there , I am making a site like ehow and I think your articles would really fit in well. Would I be able to link back to your article?
November 19th, 2011 at 10:45 am
Hi there , I am making a new blog and some of your original articles would really fit in well. Would you let me copy your article?
February 3rd, 2012 at 1:38 pm
In this great pattern of things you actually secure a B+ for hard work. Exactly where you actually confused me was on your details. You know, as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And it couldn”t be much more correct right here. Having said that, allow me reveal to you precisely what did give good results. The text can be very persuasive and that is most likely why I am making the effort in order to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, whilst I can notice the jumps in reasoning you make, I am not necessarily confident of how you appear to unite the points which inturn make your conclusion. For now I shall yield to your issue however trust in the near future you actually link the facts better.
February 3rd, 2012 at 1:42 pm
Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.
February 4th, 2012 at 4:00 am
Throughout the grand design of things you secure an A+ just for effort. Where exactly you actually misplaced me was in all the specifics. You know, as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn”t be much more accurate here. Having said that, let me reveal to you what did give good results. The authoring is highly persuasive and that is possibly the reason why I am taking an effort to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, although I can easily notice a leaps in logic you make, I am definitely not convinced of just how you seem to unite your details which produce your conclusion. For right now I shall subscribe to your position however wish in the near future you actually link your dots better.
February 4th, 2012 at 9:01 pm
Your blog provided my with valuable information to work with. You have done a admirable job. Thanks
February 7th, 2012 at 7:46 am
L0aPE2 Is anybody strong in radio here? We need a colleague who would tell us briefly about the transistor T2. I hope there are radio amateurs here. If it`s not on the subject at all, then I`m sorry. I have to write because I have no choice. PS: if the spelling is not right then also I”m sorry, I”m just 13 years old!….
February 7th, 2012 at 2:32 pm
I’m impressed, I must say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. Your idea is outstanding; the issue is something that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.
February 8th, 2012 at 8:54 am
Mark Twain: “The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them.”