http://thephilosopherschair.com/279-angels-without-feathers ... Our views on philosophy Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:24:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://thephilosopherschair.com/279-angels-without-feathers/comment-page-1#comment-1133 Donald Swarbrick Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:03:53 +0000 http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=279#comment-1133 Hi Taty, It is a poor example of what I am trying to say. Next week I will explain things better. When I used the word cherubim, it was only meant as an example of how wrong we might interpret biblical ideas. Not one of my best examples. Thanks for your opinion though. Hi Taty, It is a poor example of what I am trying to say. Next week I will explain things better. When I used the word cherubim, it was only meant as an example of how wrong we might interpret biblical ideas. Not one of my best examples.
Thanks for your opinion though.

]]> http://thephilosopherschair.com/279-angels-without-feathers/comment-page-1#comment-1132 admin Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:31:39 +0000 http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=279#comment-1132 Donald, since I believe in angels I will keep believing in the "feathered angels", rather than accepting the idea of humanoid aliens flying around in chrubim space crafts - which btw does sound as a very possible theory. Possible or not, I prefer the feathered angels :) Donald, since I believe in angels I will keep believing in the “feathered angels”, rather than accepting the idea of humanoid aliens flying around in chrubim space crafts – which btw does sound as a very possible theory. Possible or not, I prefer the feathered angels

]]>