Ethics and Reality
Ethics and Reality
by Tatiana Velitchkov © 2009
The attempt to reconcile the good for the individual with the good for all is the most pervasive problems in theoretical ethics. It is a problem which emerges in current discussions between purpose and rationalism and in more customary debate between relativism and absolutism. A crucial cause of this complexity arises from a failure to position ethics in metaphysics.
Ethics decision making is a process that involves agents choosing actions. An ethical action takes place as the extinction of events which can add to the action in many ways. It is never a lonely incidence nor is it made in an identical context to any other ethical conclusion. Ethical actions must occur in a context in which many likely actions could take place. Actions which could not have been made are not ethical decisions at all.
Ethical positions enable us to review a given action’s possessions for Goodness, previous to that deed being done. The position enables an individual to determine the good condition between two or more given options. The fortitude of whether or not a good action is presented remains with the argent. Once the action has been done, its determination is established and the deed becomes an aspect contributing to additional actions and entities. When one action donates to another action or unit then it is functioning in it.
Reality is what boxes an individual on the ear. The mirage, the capture, is to gaze beyond this, to look towards the innermost kernel. The outer husk is the deepest kernel while the look is the reality. An individual himself is real, the critical nature of reality though he or she must be smacked on the ears to be reminded of what is already known. Spiritual respect is an ever-greater embedded ness in the planet. Spiritual transcendence is only realized in total immanence, flee, avoidance, rejection are all impossible. That one is actual and here, that the place too is actual that is enlightenment.
To state that we are real is the same as saying there is no deep difference between looks and actuality though individuals experience numerous piecemeal delusions. The believe that we are not equipment of the sort that cars and trees are is the theoretical expression of a self loathing so deep and so complete that it must reject what is absolutely the case, a self loathing so powerful and so detailed that it seeks to wipe out every piece of the self that is reviled.
Much of the history of philosophy and of religion is pathological, much of it is a wrestle, an obvious wrestle just as the life of the researcher or the priest is a long wrestle from the actual world.
Tags: current discussions between purpose and rationalism, customary debate between relativism and absolutism, Ethics, Ethics decision making is a process that involves agents choosing actions, failure to position ethics in metaphysics, reality, Reality is what boxes an individual on the ear, to reconcile the good for the individual with the good for all is the most pervasive problems in theoretical ethics, To state that we are real is the same as saying there is no deep difference between looks and actuality though individuals experience numerous piecemeal delusions
