Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction
Product Description
Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction is aimed at students of metaphysics who have already completed an introductory philosophy course. This third edition of the successful textbook provides a fresh look at key topics in metaphysics and includes two new chapters on time and causation.
Wherever possible, Loux links contemporary views to their classical sources in the history of philosophy. This new edition also keeps the user-friendly format, the chapter… More >>
Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction
Tags: Contemporary, Introduction, Metaphysics
February 22nd, 2010 at 10:42 pm
Murky:
In his book, 1984, Orwell described a contrived language he called “newspeak”, designed to render politically incorrect ideas inexpressible. But before Orwell there were Russell and Whitehead, who contrived a symbolic logic that distorts ideas they deemed philosophically incorrect by combining logical quantification with expression of existence. As Whitehead wrote in his “Foreword” to Quine”s Ph.D. dissertation titled A System of Logic: logic shapes metaphysical thought.
Thus in his “On Universals” Quine argued that in the Russellian logic realism must be expressed by quantifying over predicates so they reference universals as “entities”. And he co-authored with Goodman “Steps toward a Constructive Nominalism”, a nominalist manifesto, in which all philosophers are classified as either nominalists or “platonists” depending on whether or not predicates are quantified so they reference entities. I believe that anyone who says that universals are “referenced” or who uses the phrase “abstract entities” fully deserves to be labeled a Platonist.
But Loux uses the rhetoric from the Russellian nominalist newspeak. In the “search inside this book” screens at this Amazon web site the reader will find him reporting (p. 20) that realists say universals are shared “entities” and are “referents” of predicates.
I ask Loux: What happened to signification? The symbolic logician Alonzo Church recognized sense (i.e. signification) as well as denotation (i.e. reference) in the functional (i.e. predicate) calculus. I ask Loux: What happened to supposition, which distinguishes reference from signification? In his book titled Meaning and Necessity Rudolf Carnap explicitly affirms that intensions (i.e. significations) may be said to be objective without invoking any hypostatization (i.e. reference), and are indifferent to either concrete or abstract objects. I ask Loux: Since the demise of logical positivism does the Russellian predicate calculus have any applications in philosophy or anywhere else? Is Loux trying to appear contemporary with the Russellian rhetoric? I see murky writing.
Muddled:
Loux is sympathetic to Aristotle and unsympathetic to Quine, the pragmatic realist, who rejects first philosophies with their prejudicial ontological criteria for scientific criticism, and who affirms ontological relativity in which ontological commitment is subordinated to empirical testing.
Ontological relativity started as an analogy: Quine relativized ontology as Einstein relativized time. Einstein posited relativistic time as real time instead of Newton”s absolute time, and he rejected Lorentz”s making relativistic time apparent time. Likewise Heisenberg invoked this Einstein precedent for his own realistic Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory”s positing of duality and indeterminacy. Today physicists describe reality in terms of superposition, nonlocality and Calabi-Yau spaces in eleven dimensions. Quine generalized beyond physics to our global web of beliefs.
Realism is a natural, primordial, irrepressible prejudice motivated by disappointments in our beliefs including falsifications of our scientific theories. On the other hand ontology is anything but natural or primordial. It is an elaborately complex linguistic artifact that evolves and that has a cultural history. It is reality as cognitively captured by the artifactual semantics of language expressing our accepted general beliefs including our tested and currently nonfalsified scientific theories.
But in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic and in this book Loux rejects ontological relativity, and he calls philosophies using ontological relativity “anti-Realism”. In fact ontological relativity and relativized semantics do not oppose realism, but rather they enable it in this age of scientific change. I do not find this book contemporary. Loux”s “Realism – anti-Realism” locution is a false dichotomy. I see muddled thinking.
Marginalized:
While a student I found Notre Dame”s philosophy faculty unsympathetic to contemporary pragmatism and its scientific realism. When I left their graduate school of philosophy I took with me the opinion that their academic culture is a marginalized backwater preferring to protect the past rather than forge the future with new thinking. I see in this book a textbook in Notre Dame metaphysics for Notre Dame philosophy students, who will graduate to teach in other Catholic philosophy schools. Such is philosophy in the Notre Dame bubble.
Readers who are cognizant of the influence of modern science on philosophy – notably how quantum theory occasioned the emergence and ascendancy of contemporary pragmatism – are likely to be more critical of this book than other reviewers at this Amazon site.
Thomas J. Hickey
Rating: 1 / 5
February 23rd, 2010 at 1:17 am
This book made the study western metaphysics a positive, stimulating enterprise again for me. I was especially pleased in how Loux tied contemporary viewpoints to their ancient roots where possible.
Rating: 5 / 5
February 23rd, 2010 at 2:38 am
Metaphysics is an extremely abstract topic in philosophy, yet one cannot fully do philosophy without a basic understanding of metaphysics. Loux”s book is the introduction to metaphysics that anyone can pick up and begin to understand what the arguments are in metaphysics. After reading this introductory book, one should have the knowledge to begin to delve into other areas of philosophy – or to seek a deeper understanding of metaphysics in other areas. I can”t think of a better beginning point for learning about the basic arguments and positions in metaphysics than this book. Though every introduction is limited by space and will cover different topics, Loux”s book is one of the most comprehensive introductions to metaphysics that I”ve seen.
Rating: 5 / 5
February 22nd, 2010 at 9:58 pm
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … Perestroika of the History of Technology and Science – Philosophy Studies was posted on Monday, February 22nd, 2010 at 6:59 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:01 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:22 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
February 23rd, 2010 at 5:27 am
This is an excellent introduction to contemporary metaphysics. You cannot put this book down without clearly understanding the many shades of Realism and Nominalism. The chapters on necessity and possibility were excellent.
For me, at least, there is the glaring omission of any sort of contribution that A. Whitehead (the 20th century”s pre-eminent metaphysician)made to the field, but that”s understandable in an introductory text.
This is philosophy. Go for it.
Rating: 4 / 5
February 23rd, 2010 at 6:54 am
“Metaphysics” has meant many things to many different people. Loux helpfully distinguishes in the introduction between general and special metaphysics. The former concerns being qua being, and the latter concerns disparate topics such as free will, cosmology, and God. Loux said he would only concern himself with general metaphysics. Specifically, he concerns himself with Anglophone general metaphysics from 1950 to 1990. Thus, the subtitle, “A Contemporary Introduction.”
Loux treats universals (realism vs. nominalism), concrete particulars (substrata vs. bundles, persistence through time), propositions, and modality (necessity and possibility). He handles matters will a degree of explicitness, thoroughness, and evenhandedness. The text is challenging at points–I attribute this to the fact that metaphysics cannot be dumbed down.
All in all, quite thorough and an excellent introduction to contemporary general metaphysics.
Rating: 4 / 5
March 1st, 2010 at 3:43 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 3rd, 2010 at 2:08 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 5th, 2010 at 4:58 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 9th, 2010 at 1:34 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 11th, 2010 at 1:48 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 15th, 2010 at 2:56 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 19th, 2010 at 2:40 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 23rd, 2010 at 2:07 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 25th, 2010 at 1:55 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
March 31st, 2010 at 2:48 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
April 6th, 2010 at 3:34 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
April 14th, 2010 at 4:11 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
April 22nd, 2010 at 2:59 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A … [...]
June 18th, 2011 at 7:04 pm
WordPress is great platform for something like that, it”s a super easy to install and us for a CMS. You”ll be happy with it….
You shouldn”t have a problem. It”s an editor. It will work. You don”t need anything fancy to work with a wordpress theme. Notepad will do….
June 19th, 2011 at 6:51 am
Hey friend can i publish some paragraph of your article on my little blog of university.I have to publish a good articles out there and i really think your post Fits best into it.I will be grateful to give you an source link as well.I have two blogs one my own and the other which is my college blog.I will publish some part in the university blog.Hope you do not mind.
June 22nd, 2011 at 6:50 am
hooray, your writings on theater and writing much missed!
June 29th, 2011 at 11:55 am
I”m truly loving the appearance/design of the site The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction . Do you at any time come across any sort of web browser compatibility issues! There is a handful of our own audience have complained about my site not really working effectively in Explorer although great inside Safari. Have you got any tips to assist resolve the problem? Furthermore did you hear Egypt wonderful news
July 1st, 2011 at 7:16 am
Not sure what you mean? Is it a private blog? Or is it open to the public?…
That would be the easy way. Install it again – to a different subdirectory – and point it at a second database….
July 4th, 2011 at 2:46 am
Lets get out the vote for mayor of Revere. Vote early and vote often!
July 5th, 2011 at 3:57 am
Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn anything like this before. So nice to search out someone with some unique ideas on this subject. realy thank you for beginning this up. this website is one thing that is needed on the net, somebody with a little bit originality. useful job for bringing one thing new to the internet!
July 6th, 2011 at 10:13 am
Will Dan Rizzo be indicted for campaign violations before the election?
July 6th, 2011 at 3:55 pm
I will be back soon and follow up with a response.
July 14th, 2011 at 7:43 pm
There are four generations of iPhone models, each accompanied by one of the four major releases of iOS (formerly iPhone OS). The original iPhone was a GSM phone that established design precedents like screen size and button placement that have persisted through all models.
July 15th, 2011 at 12:41 pm
nice share, good article, very usefull for me…thank you
July 16th, 2011 at 5:45 pm
Hi Admin. I just finished setting my site, were you can get a list of 81 links that are page rank 1 to page rank 3 for FREE. Thei are Auto Approved blogs, and can help you promote your site for free. My advise is that you post a maximum a 20-30 comments/day, and try to split the links betwin more posts from your site. Thanks and hope to see you daily on my blog, to download the new list. Florin
July 19th, 2011 at 7:36 am
free coupons…
I do believe that coupon codes are usually the way to go….
July 22nd, 2011 at 11:30 am
Your blog is showing more interest and enthusiasm.. Thank you !!!!!
July 25th, 2011 at 9:04 am
Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to make a very good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.
July 26th, 2011 at 11:28 pm
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
July 27th, 2011 at 3:18 am
Very interesting ideas! I”ll be back for your new articles!
July 27th, 2011 at 11:21 am
Very nice article! Thanks for sharing it with us!
August 2nd, 2011 at 12:34 am
I couldn”t tell if this was one of those power blogs that are all the rage these days. You might have already come across something like this. Power blogs or even auto blogs are websites that grow on their own. They include professional graphics, professionally written articles and stuff like that. As you can probably tell, I have personally tested out these systems. I”d have to say that I am quite pleased with the results so far. The program that I am talking about is actually kind of expensive but I have discovered a loophole so that you can get a major discount. When you get to the sales page, just close the browser window and another little window will popup to try to keep you on the page. Click to stay on the page and you will be able to get the whole system for just $27. Not bad huh? Go to this webpage if you want to check it out for yourself…
August 15th, 2011 at 11:43 pm
I was very pleased to find this web-site.I wanted to thanks for your time for this wonderful read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post.
September 15th, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear idea I”m extremely impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays..
September 27th, 2011 at 4:23 am
This can be a really good research for me, should admit which you are one of the most efficient bloggers I actually saw.Thanks for posting this educational article.
October 26th, 2011 at 9:03 pm
Sites We Like…
[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]…
October 27th, 2011 at 4:42 am
Hi there! I simply would like to give a huge thumbs up for the nice data you”ve gotten right here on this post. I will probably be coming back to your weblog for more soon.
October 30th, 2011 at 3:16 am
this website is my breathing in, really good style and design and perfect subject matter.
November 16th, 2011 at 1:19 am
I precisely needed to appreciate you once again. I”m not certain what I would”ve implemented without those methods revealed by you directly on my concern. Certainly was a distressing situation for me, nevertheless discovering the very skilled manner you treated that made me to cry with gladness. Now i am grateful for this assistance and as well , hope you comprehend what an amazing job that you are getting into educating many people through your site. I know that you”ve never got to know all of us.
January 31st, 2012 at 6:05 pm
Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!