Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction
Product Description
Identifies the philosophical problems that science raises through an examination of questions about its nature, methods and justification. A valuable introduction for science and philosophy students alike…. More >>
Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction
Tags: Contemporary, Introduction, Philosophy, Science
March 1st, 2010 at 8:25 am
The book arrived on time in good condtion. I appreciate the quality of the book and speedy delivery. Tnanks.
Rating: 5 / 5
March 1st, 2010 at 10:40 am
I do not have this book. I wish I did. I read the first six pages of the book which explains how various scientific disciplines have in the course of History broken off from Science, and come to constitute fields of learning of their own, and understood that this is a very clearly written and informative book. I am sure that it will lay out clearly the major questions raised today in the Philosophy of Science. As I understand it one major idea of the work is that there are philosophical questions that Science cannot answer . Or to put this in another way that Philosophy in a sense sets the limits of scientific inquiry.
What strikes and troubles me in terms of the relationship of Philosophy and Science is that the latter produces in many cases testable conclusions, and thus has the authority of providing us ” truth”. And this when as far as I can tell or feel ” philosophical discourse ” is like discourse in the humanities, ” interpretative”. And it thus does not provide us with what is testable, objective, and ” communally held”. Of course I know that one of the questions of Philosophy of Science is whether there is such a ”thing” as ” objective truth”. But clearly in common sense terms, and in terms of the way most people think and act in the world of the mind ” scientific results” do have a quality in truth, that ” philosophical arguments ” do not.
I am curious as to how this volume deals with these questions.
I apologize for taking the reader”s time. My sense is that this is a very good introduction to the whole subject.
Rating: 5 / 5
March 1st, 2010 at 11:50 am
This is a fine introduction to philosophy of science. Rosenberg discusses why philosophy of science is such an important part of philosophy and how philosophy is connected to a number of deep and traditional problems of philosophy, particularly epistemologic questions. Scientific explanation, the nature of scientific laws and concepts of causation, the nature and role of theories, some of the traditional models of scientific explanation and progress like the D-N model and Popper”s notion of falsification, challenges to traditional empiricism such as Kuhn”s model and Quine”s analysis of underdetermination are all covered very well. These are often difficult topics but Rosenberg is a good writer and the explanations are generally clear. Each chapter has a nice summary and guide to the literature. The prevailing impression left by the text is the inadequacy of contemporary philosophy of science to really understand science and explain its successes.
Rating: 4 / 5
March 1st, 2010 at 1:50 pm
This book emphasizes problems in the philosophy of science over answers. It is specifically and effectively written as an introduction for beginning students. Thus, it proceeds mainly by identifying philosophical problems, thinking through potential answers, and then identifying problems with those potential answers. To other reviewers, this approach seems to have given the impression of unnecessary or unexpected digression, although I did not find the approach burdensome.
Introductory education is as much about exposure to a range of issues and practice with ways of thinking as it is about specifying facts; the book balances these needs well. It provides the main persons and terms of which a philosopher of science should be able to speak, but it does so in the context of critical consideration rather than simple cataloging.
I have to admit that I was a little surprised by how good the review questions were at the end of the chapters in prompting me to digest and articulate the ideas in the book, without seeming tedious or heavyhanded. The questions further emphasize critical thinking, often by requesting the reader to adopt different perspectives in approaching an issue. Many of the questions also make space for the student to bring into the discussion additional ideas not found in the book.
The book succeeds in its goal of being an introduction to the field, but as a result of its specialization the book is not well suited for two related tasks often (and not without reason) expected of introductory books. First, it is not a handy desk reference, because it is neither properly structured nor sufficiently comprehensive for a reader to turn to a page and find a straightforward summary of any topic. Second, the book will not provide sufficient reading material for a semester-long university course, although it will provide the backbone to a course.
The book approaches philosophy of science with a rather philosophical emphasis. Although early in the book Rosenberg notes a clear sense in which science requires philosophy, he has not written a book of answers to the kind of philosophical issues that typically pop up in the work of a research scientist. Indeed he occasionally notes that major issues discussed in the book are (seen as) irrelevant within the practice of research scientists. This is most true of the topic he pursues at greatest length: Kuhn”s concept of scientific paradigms and the legacy of Kuhn”s insight. While it might actually be extremely useful for researchers to consider the role of “normal science” in determining their research, Kuhn”s legacy is mainly in the practically irrelevant idea that scientific research does not actually provide an increasingly close approximation of objective natural reality. This is a philosophically (and socio-historically) important issue, but scientists have no reason to attend to it (and every reason not to).
Although I was amenable to this esoteric/non-applied philosophy approach, on a perhaps-related note I was disappointed by the relative paucity of concrete examples in a discussion of evidence/epistemology. The one topic I wish had been pursued more was the notion of observable vs. unobservable things in nature, as this distinction was used in a commonsense way without being defined or justified. Indeed, an argument of Locke”s mentioned in the book seems to invalidate this distinction, but this was not discussed.
Ultimately I think any reader/reviewer will wish some topic had been explored farther, but as the identities of these issues seems to vary from person to person, I think this indicates success rather than deficiency. This book is an introduction to questions, not a compendium of answers. The book is concise, and as I mentioned above I think a course based around this book would have room for additional reading. Thus, students would be able to pursue interests sparked but left unfulfilled by the book, or instructors could fill in deficiencies they find in the book”s coverage. For similar reasons, this book is a good read for informal students or readers with specialized interests, who want to obtain a grounding in the philosophy of science without being inhibited with an overly comprehensive volume.
.
(This is a review of the first edition.)
Rating: 4 / 5
March 1st, 2010 at 2:34 pm
I used this book in an introduction to philosophy of science course I took, along with an anthology of papers. The papers were hard to understand without this book. They were filled with a lot of jargon, and labels for different theories. This book helped me understand the labels, but it also got behind them to what the real issues between competing philosophies of science are, and how their arguments worked. It was not easy going but the effort to follow Rosenberg”s presentation was worth it.
Rating: 5 / 5
June 19th, 2011 at 11:32 pm
awesome sharing, very interesting. I like it very much. I come acoss the site by google search engine. I may visit your site weekly and share it to my relatives. Please keep it fresh. Keep on the good work. – A sweet girl
June 20th, 2011 at 2:46 am
nice site, very resourceful. I like it in deed. I come acoss your website by baidu search engine. I will visit your site weekly and forward it to my relatives. Please keep it fresh. Keep on the good work. – A sweet girl
July 12th, 2011 at 5:35 am
Does anyone know how my team can get in contact with the developer? It would be appreciated!
August 2nd, 2011 at 12:01 am
This isn”t a power blog or auto blog right? These are still growing in popularity. Power blogs or even auto blogs are websites that grow on their own. They include professional graphics, professionally written articles and stuff like that. As you can probably tell, I have personally tested out these systems. I”d have to say that I am quite pleased with the results so far. There is a cost to get in the program but I accidentally found out that you can get a hefty discount. When you get to the sales page, just close the browser window and another little window will popup to try to keep you on the page. Click to stay on the page and you will be able to get the whole system for just $27. Not bad huh? Go to this webpage if you want to check it out for yourself…
August 15th, 2011 at 11:43 pm
I was very pleased to find this web-site.I wanted to thanks for your time for this wonderful read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post.
October 8th, 2011 at 12:45 pm
Neat share!Thank you so much!
October 16th, 2011 at 4:06 pm
aSB1iR iruxfofwrniv, [url= [link=
October 16th, 2011 at 4:57 pm
Websites You Should Visit…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…
October 26th, 2011 at 9:48 am
Nice post. I be taught something tougher on different blogs everyday. It”ll all the time be stimulating to read content from different writers and apply a little bit something from their store. I’d want to make use of some with the content material on my blog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your net blog. Thanks for sharing.
October 29th, 2011 at 9:12 pm
so much excellent information on here, : D.
November 1st, 2011 at 3:15 pm
This webpage won”t show up correctly on my blackberry – you might wanna try and fix that
November 2nd, 2011 at 8:53 am
photo booth rental…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 3rd, 2011 at 12:51 am
Anonse Radom…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 3rd, 2011 at 4:35 pm
( seo|seo analiz|seo danışmanı|google 1. sayfa)…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 5th, 2011 at 12:24 am
2012 disastersolar strom 2011solar flare 2012electromagnetic disaster…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 5th, 2011 at 12:24 pm
Thought I may add this “If most of us are ashamed of shabby clothes and shoddy furniture, let us be more ashamed of shabby ideas and shoddy philosophies… It would be a sad situation if the wrapper were better than the meat wrapped inside it.” – Albert Einstein
November 5th, 2011 at 6:15 pm
hello!,I like your writing very so much! percentage we keep in touch extra about your post on AOL? I require an expert in this house to resolve my problem. May be that”s you! Looking forward to look you.
November 5th, 2011 at 11:53 pm
regge bum bum
November 6th, 2011 at 5:55 am
nike mercurial vapor…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 6th, 2011 at 1:41 pm
soccer cleats…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 6th, 2011 at 7:22 pm
I take delight in looking at concepts by attention grabbing writers.You have done a excellent labeur with this piece of writing.Say thanks for that advantageous and informative concent.
November 7th, 2011 at 9:05 am
It is fine news.
November 8th, 2011 at 9:04 am
Website Trackback Link…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]…
November 9th, 2011 at 1:57 pm
You really make it appear really easy along with your presentation but I to find this matter to be actually one thing that I feel I would never understand. It sort of feels too complicated and extremely wide for me. I”m looking forward to your subsequent publish, I’ll try to get the hang of it!
November 10th, 2011 at 5:04 am
Get lots through your thoughts,and i favorite all your article!
November 11th, 2011 at 6:54 pm
Lower Back Pain Kidney…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 11th, 2011 at 8:03 pm
Super Website…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…
November 12th, 2011 at 4:37 pm
I used to be suggested this website through my cousin. I am not positive whether or not this submit is written by means of him as nobody else recognise such specified about my trouble. You are amazing! Thanks!
November 13th, 2011 at 1:40 pm
hello,all the publish very superior.
November 14th, 2011 at 11:16 am
What i don”t understood is in reality how you”re not actually a lot more well-favored than you may be right now. You”re so intelligent. You already know therefore considerably relating to this matter, produced me in my opinion consider it from so many various angles. Its like men and women are not fascinated unless it?s something to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your individual stuffs nice. At all times take care of it up!
November 14th, 2011 at 1:28 pm
gliders and rockers…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 15th, 2011 at 11:31 am
I simply couldn”t depart your website prior to suggesting that I really loved the usual information an individual provide in your visitors? Is gonna be back frequently to investigate cross-check new posts
November 16th, 2011 at 2:04 am
A lot of thanks for your entire hard work on this web site. Kate delights in going through internet research and it”s easy to see why. A lot of people know all about the compelling mode you render good solutions via your web site and as well welcome contribution from the others on this subject and my girl is always becoming educated a lot of things. Enjoy the remaining portion of the year. You are always performing a great job.
November 16th, 2011 at 11:38 am
Websites You Should Visit…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…
November 17th, 2011 at 12:45 am
The information on this site is useful.
November 17th, 2011 at 6:59 am
Proothisi Istoselidon…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 17th, 2011 at 12:51 pm
lasertech for back pain…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 18th, 2011 at 1:00 am
I have been examining this website for a while and just really love it.But Ijust experimented with register but it said there is issues and get a hold of to the officer.louboutin heels
November 18th, 2011 at 7:19 pm
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
November 18th, 2011 at 7:57 pm
the x-pain method review…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…
November 19th, 2011 at 12:51 am
Hello,I just found this web web page via google.The message is genuinely ad¡§ in order to my life at the moment,and I”m truly joyful I happened upon all of your online site.
November 19th, 2011 at 3:58 pm
the best shop in henderson…
[...]The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction[...]…