Meditations on First Philosophy: In Which the Existence of God and the Distinction of the Soul from the Body Are Demonstrated
Product Description
Meditations on First Philosophy written by legendary philosopher Rene Descartes is widely considered to be one of the top philosophical books of all time. This great classic will surely attract a whole new generation of readers. For many, Meditations on First Philosophy is required reading for various courses and curriculums. And for others who simply enjoy reading timeless pieces of classic philosophical literature, this gem by Rene Descartes is highly recommended…. More >>
Tags: Body, Demonstrated, Distinction, Existence, First, From, Meditations, Philosophy, soul
July 28th, 2010 at 1:26 am
The back of this book calls Meditations “the fundamental and originating work of the modern era in Western philosophy.” It was undoubtedly influential. Descartes is credited for the notion that the mind and body are separate entities, that man is a machine, and the phrase “cogito ergo sum.” For these reasons, this book is worth reading. However, Descartes makes many strange and incoherent arguments (especially concerning the existence of God), and I question the contemporary value of his philosophy.
One way of reading the Meditations is to see it as an argument showing that God and science are not at odds. Instead they are compatible, and he argues even that one cannot act rightly without proper understanding. Apparently, Descartes had been so horrified by Catholic Church forcing Galileo to recant his views that he stopped the publication of one of his papers.
As an attempt to make sense of what we can know, Descartes failed, and failed in some parts quite obviously. But as in all the other philosophical writings, an argument with holes does not make it worthless as philosophy. Its value lies in the influence it had on changing how we perceive the world.
Rating: 4 / 5
July 28th, 2010 at 1:49 am
I had to write a school term paper. I chose Mediation. After researching it a bit, I changed the paper”s subject. I only looked through this book I have not read it.
Rating: 5 / 5
July 28th, 2010 at 2:51 am
This book was translated from old French. It was in English but I could barely make sense of it and i”m into these kinds of books. I don”t know whether it was his style that I didn”t like or it was just plain hard to read. Could be because it was written so long ago.
This book has words from the 1500”s that no one uses anymore. The book discusses the soul and the body. Physics, Astronomy , Medicine and Science. This is 100 pages of heavy stuff. If you are very patient, interested in Philosophy and very smart you may like this book..
Rating: 3 / 5
July 28th, 2010 at 5:49 am
Rene Descartes, a great mathematician, surely a creative genius in the field, used his prodigious intellect to answer some of the great questions like how do we know, what can we know, what is the difference between thinking and sensing, and many other questions following from these basic ones. However, in doing so, he painted himself and generations of philosophers into a philosophical corner from which he and others have been trying to extricate themselves for hundreds of years. This philosophical cul-de-sac, this “corner,” is known as Dualism.
Using the “method of doubt,” Descartes concluded that there were two worlds, the world of mind and the world of the senses. The world of senses could be deceived, nay, easily deceived, whereas the world of mind could not be deceived because it was based on indubitable truths and understandings. These truths and understandings are indubitable because they are “clear and distinct” such as the fact that “I think.” The thought “I think” is clear and distinct because it cannot be doubted as such. Whether I am deceived or not about what I perceive or think, there is always an “I” thinking. So even when in error there is an I…thinking.
For Descartes, other ideas are clear and distinct in our minds because God puts them there. For example, the idea of a perfect, immutable, eternally existent God is clear and distinct because God Himself places the idea of him into our minds. Our own finite minds could not even conceive of this God, let alone conceive of Him in a clear and distinct way just because our minds are finite; thus we must have a clear and distinct understanding of Him because He places that thought in our minds.
In sum, there are two worlds: an outside world which cannot be known clearly and distinctly, which is relegated to the realm of imperfection and confusion by the method of doubt, and an inside world (non-material) which can be known clearly and distinctly in two ways:
(1)the thinking I is known by eliminating everything except the I through the method of doubt; and (2) God is known because He put the idea of Himself into my mind. Thus, “Dualism”arises.
To write a full exposition of the problem of Dualism would, I think, require a lengthy treatise or monograph so I shall briefly list some of the problems with this theory at this point.
A. The mind is often telling us to move towards or away from various experiences and places; likewise various bodily sensations will effect our thinking. Dualism thus does not account for the influence or interaction of mind on the body or vice-versa.
B. Dualism does not really satisfactorily rule out that a body cannot think or that bodily motions are not thought. May it not be that body is implicated in some way in our thinking even though when I think or say “I think” I am not aware of that bodily involvement? Does the “I think” necessarily exclude the idea of extension? It”s never demonstrated.
C. Has the idea of God really come from God? Has He put it in our minds? Does not our conception of Him also depend upon our books, our friends, our institutions, etc.?
Though an angel is more perfect than we, we might have an idea of an angel without the angel having caused it in us.
D. If the idea of God comes into our minds from God, why is it that many peoples in the world do not have the idea of the Christian Almighty God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in their minds when they “think” of God?
E. Why does an atheist agree about the existence of a triangle (which is understood for Descartes in an a priori sense just like the way we experience God), but not about the existence of God?
F. Why cannot that which we perceive clearly and distinctly also be doubted? What can we ever embrace if clarity and distinctness are our criteria for knowing?
G. Since the mind according to Descartes can only comprehend God in a manner that is “utterly inadequate,” how can one “investigate with sufficient clarity and distinctness” what or who God is as Descartes proposes to do?”
H. Why is it better to know of God”s existence by a purely inferential criterion (He put the idea in my mind) rather than by the scholastic method of going back to a Cause of all existent things, the basic Prime Mover? Does not the scholastic method have the advantage of not being self-referent nor depending on a mere inference to justify God”s existence?
I. How does it follow from the fact that one is unaware that anything else belongs to one”s essence that nothing else really belongs to one”s essence?
J. The mind is affirmed in Descartes by a process of negation of bodily knowledge. However, there is no real exposition of the mind”s operations.
K. Why is there no discussion of morals in the dualistic scheme proposed by Descartes? Is this not a serious omission?
L. Why does the idea of an immutable, eternal God need a cause? The idea of a triangle is immutable and eternal, but does not need a cause.
M. Descartes has described an insecure universe. Rationalism is king. In his version of the universe, mathe-matics is king, but empirical understandings are built on shifting sand, and are always untrustworthy. Descartes” God has created an almost unintelligible material world. Yet, this goes against both our observations and against the dependability of scientific conclusions.
We observe a regularity of seasons and of day and night following each other, and many other regularities besides. Science observes and defines law-like operations in the material world that cannot be observed by the unaided eye; yet that knowledge produces remarkable and consistent results. Does not this suggest more certainty in empirical knowledge than Descartes would be prone to accept?
N. Descartes” rationalism verges on solipsism because of the unreliability of shared, “outer” experience.
With so many areas for possible objections, I think it would be fair to say that Descartes” Dualism is more problematic than helpful.
Rating: 3 / 5
July 28th, 2010 at 6:12 am
this book it”s a must even if you don”t believe in god. descartes tried to prove the existence of god using the proofs of existing of everything else that”s around us. well, i don”t believe that god shuld or can be proved by pure logic…cause in a world of pure logic the concept of god wouldn”t make any sense. none the less we should get to that conclusion yourself by reading this one !
Rating: 5 / 5
July 28th, 2010 at 3:37 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Meditations on First Philosophy: In Which the Ex… [...]
July 28th, 2010 at 6:36 am
[...] The Philosophers Chair » Blog Archive » Meditations on First Philosophy: In Which the Ex… [...]
September 17th, 2010 at 8:11 am
Consequently, every human soul has inherited something of God”s divine nature, no matter how obscure it may be. Darnell Philosophy
September 19th, 2010 at 4:54 pm
Chai Latte Soul and Body Wash celebrates the God and Goddess within us all. Philosophy Wholesale
July 5th, 2011 at 3:35 pm
Un article fantastique ! Continuez sur cette voie
August 1st, 2011 at 11:54 pm
This isn”t a power blog or auto blog right? You might have already come across something like this. The type of site that I am talking about is one that is grown automatically. They include professional graphics, professionally written articles and stuff like that. I actually tried it out myself. So far it seems pretty good. There is a cost to get in the program but I accidentally found out that you can get a hefty discount. When you get to the sales page, just close the browser window and another little window will popup to try to keep you on the page. Click to stay on the page and you will be able to get the whole system for just $27. I don”t think you can beat that price. Go to this webpage if you want to check it out for yourself…
August 15th, 2011 at 11:43 pm
I have found your website on Google and the information written on your post is interesting. I enjoy reading this one, looking forward to reading more of your posts!!
August 19th, 2011 at 2:37 am
Wonderful blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I”ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thanks
August 19th, 2011 at 6:39 am
Hi! I know this is kinda off topic however I”d figured I”d ask. Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest authoring a blog article or vice-versa? My site goes over a lot of the same subjects as yours and I believe we could greatly benefit from each other. If you are interested feel free to send me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Superb blog by the way!
August 19th, 2011 at 11:47 am
Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read?
August 19th, 2011 at 4:59 pm
Have you ever considered writing an ebook or guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog based on the same information you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would appreciate your work. If you”re even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e-mail.
September 24th, 2011 at 9:53 pm
VfnmXY Yeah, it is clear now !… Just can not figure out how often do you update your blog?!…
October 2nd, 2011 at 7:51 am
Can I just say what a aid to search out somebody who truly knows what theyre speaking about on the internet. You positively know the way to carry an issue to gentle and make it important. Extra individuals need to learn this and perceive this facet of the story. I cant imagine youre not more well-liked because you positively have the gift.
October 15th, 2011 at 6:36 pm
Highest quality xrumer links service – build Very best ranks plus significant web site traffic with our effective one way links packages. Most powerful & cost effective oneway links services of all time! XrumerGod.com – search engine marketing – back-links – web site building – search engine marketing techniques – social media
October 23rd, 2011 at 7:55 am
Today, I went to the beach front with my kids. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!
October 24th, 2011 at 3:23 am
I originally wanted the white iPhone 4 so I held off for months then I gave up cause my iPhone 3G was irritating the crap out of me once I updated it to the 4.0 software. It”s pretty pointless to release this now. Apple should at least offer a discount if people wanted to trade their black one. iPod to iPod Santa could be farther away than the basement if he was on Sprint (or jailbroken like me). Facetime is kinda pointless in its current iteration. ”Hey, call me from the next room. Or maybe I”ll guess if you”re somewhere on unmanaged wifi right now..”Sprint/Fringe seems to have the right idea-
October 24th, 2011 at 4:34 am
You know. I hear a lot of people arguing about this carrier is better than the other. That this Iphone is going to suck compared to this iphone. I think people should just relax. You realize the more successful the iphone is everywhere, the more support you will see for it overall. Shouldn”t that be good enough for everyone. I hear people just get stupidly rude towards one and other about this stuff. It is kinda rediculous.I personally have Verizon. I have been with them for many years. We always had Alltel and Verizon here. Now Alltel is switching to ATT here. I know how good the service is here for Verizon so I will stick with them hard to tell what ATT will be like in Wyoming. convert mkv to mp4 4.0″ screen is a must. A notification system in the home button would be amazing with the home button square lighting up different colors. Every year i always say im not getting the next iPhone and waiting for the one after that, but so far I”ve always got the next one. Yeah If they come out with a bigger screen I”ll probably end up getting it. I won”t be able to survive knowing that there”s a larger screen iPhone.
October 26th, 2011 at 9:35 am
There are some interesting cut-off dates in this article but I don’t know if I see all of them center to heart. There”s some validity however I”ll take maintain opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want extra! Added to FeedBurner as effectively
October 29th, 2011 at 11:44 pm
I reckon something genuinely special in this internet site .
November 1st, 2011 at 3:14 am
As soon as I observed this site I went on reddit to share some of the love with them. comments by Chester Helsley @ The interesting viewpoint is mentioned in the email from Shelia Patience @ <a href=鈥渉ttp:// user club
November 5th, 2011 at 7:21 pm
Awesome post, the information helped me out a fantastic deal. I”ll bookmark this web page for future updates. Thanks again.
November 5th, 2011 at 9:17 pm
As I web-site possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling fantastic , appreciate it for your hard work. You should keep it up forever! Best of luck.
November 9th, 2011 at 5:33 pm
It is really a great and helpful piece of info. I am satisfied that you simply shared this useful information with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.
November 19th, 2011 at 8:13 pm
[...]Actually helpful!