<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosophers Chair &#187; come</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephilosopherschair.com/tag/come/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com</link>
	<description>... Our views on philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who will come after the Slav-Greeks die off?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2952-who-will-come-after-the-slav-greeks-die-off</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2952-who-will-come-after-the-slav-greeks-die-off#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Modern Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[After]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[come]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlavGreeks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/2952-who-will-come-after-the-slav-greeks-die-off</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question by banjo: Who will come after the Slav-Greeks die off? As you all know, modern day Greeks (or malakas as I like to call them) are descended from Slav settlers. Modern day Greeks are just hellenized slavs. They are, minimal at best, descended from the old ancient warriors and philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Socrated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><i>Question by banjo</i>: Who will come after the Slav-Greeks die off?</strong><br />
As you all know, modern day Greeks (or malakas as I like to call them) are descended from Slav settlers. Modern day Greeks are just hellenized slavs. They are, minimal at best, descended from the old ancient warriors and philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Socrated etc etc. My question is this. Since the Hellenic culture, or dynasty, or whatever else you want to call it, is pretty good at surviving, what do you think is in the future in terms of the Greek people?</p>
<p><strong>Best answer:</strong></p>
<p><i>Answer by Vasiliki ♪♫♪</i><br />First of all is Greeks and not Slav-Greeks.<br />
Second, is Socrates and not Socrated, it is not a verb, it is a name.<br />
Greeks survived thousands of years, and there are  just a few nations who have achieved that&#8230;<br />
So, I don&#8217;t see the Greeks and Greek culture dying off soon.<br />
Sorry to disapoint you but</p>
<p><strong>Give your answer to this question below!</strong></p>
<p>More <a href="http://thephilosopherschair.com/view/modern-philosophers">Modern Philosophers Articles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2952-who-will-come-after-the-slav-greeks-die-off/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/870-immanuel-kant-prolegomena-to-any-future-metaphysics-that-will-be-able-to-come-forward-as-science-with-selections-from-the-critique-of-pure-reason</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/870-immanuel-kant-prolegomena-to-any-future-metaphysics-that-will-be-able-to-come-forward-as-science-with-selections-from-the-critique-of-pure-reason#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Able]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[come]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prolegomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/870-immanuel-kant-prolegomena-to-any-future-metaphysics-that-will-be-able-to-come-forward-as-science-with-selections-from-the-critique-of-pure-reason</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Product DescriptionThis new, revised edition of Kant&#8217;s Prolegomena, the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly through careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant&#8217;s central arguments (including famous sections of the Schematism [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Immanuel-Kant-Prolegomena-Metaphysics-Selections/dp/0521828244%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI7SWRO5N2Q5AP7XQ%26tag%3Diphogoss-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0521828244" rel="nofollow"><img style="float:left;margin: 0 20px 10px 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31FQCHV6T2L._SL160_.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><b>Product Description</b><br />This new, revised edition of Kant&#8217;s Prolegomena, the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly through careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant&#8217;s central arguments (including famous sections of the Schematism and Analogies), and in which Kant himself explains his special terminology. The first reviews of the Crit&#8230; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Immanuel-Kant-Prolegomena-Metaphysics-Selections/dp/0521828244%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI7SWRO5N2Q5AP7XQ%26tag%3Diphogoss-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0521828244" rel="nofollow">More >></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Immanuel-Kant-Prolegomena-Metaphysics-Selections/dp/0521828244%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI7SWRO5N2Q5AP7XQ%26tag%3Diphogoss-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0521828244" title="Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason " rel="nofollow"><b>Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason </b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/870-immanuel-kant-prolegomena-to-any-future-metaphysics-that-will-be-able-to-come-forward-as-science-with-selections-from-the-critique-of-pure-reason/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you think that metaphysics, theoretical and practical science, and religion will one day come to agreement?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/731-do-you-think-that-metaphysics-theoretical-and-practical-science-and-religion-will-one-day-come-to-agreement</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/731-do-you-think-that-metaphysics-theoretical-and-practical-science-and-religion-will-one-day-come-to-agreement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[come]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theoretical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/731-do-you-think-that-metaphysics-theoretical-and-practical-science-and-religion-will-one-day-come-to-agreement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use religion in a very general sense. Maybe I mean spirituality. I just get the sense that there will be a convergence of these things, relatively soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use religion in a very general sense. Maybe I mean spirituality.</p>
<p>I just get the sense that there will be a convergence of these things, relatively soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/731-do-you-think-that-metaphysics-theoretical-and-practical-science-and-religion-will-one-day-come-to-agreement/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 288/461 objects using disk: basic

Served from: thephilosopherschair.com @ 2012-05-23 19:24:23 -->
