Question by Jung Prada G: Since early man’s physiology and modern day man’s physiology are nearly the same, is history the difference?
Early man had less history to live off of; modern day school children learn more in one day of class than that which is learned in early man’s life time.
—————–
(skip these details if it is confusing)
…I know psychologist/philosopher Steve Pinker argued AGAINST it in lay terms in “The Blank State” positing that genetics attribute to the change and adaptation of behavior (which I plan on reading soon); it’s just that, is it true that history (or experience–MTheory is the bomb, he answered a similar question with most of this insight–) trumps the belief of a blank state, all the way down to the genetic level?
*’does’ having history make the difference between early man (and the lack of recorded/communicated history between the evolution of apes to man) and modern man (in that we have an accumulation of recorded history today more than anyone else in the past have ever had)
Best answer:
Answer by M T Exactly what you are asking is unclear.
Just from your short summary it has to be some of both and not exclusively one or the other.
Question by Maximilian: Yahoo users who keep stating ‘she is dead’ and ‘they did it’, do you know difference between fact and opinion?
The difference between fact and opinion is that a fact is something that is empirically true and can be supported by evidence while an opinion is a belief that may or may not be backed up with some type of evidence. An opinion is normally a subjective statement that can be the result of an emotion or an individual interpretation of a fact. For example, biological differences between males and females are a fact while a preference for one gender over the other is opinion.
Although the differences between facts and opinions usually rest on whether they are objective or subjective respectively, a fact can in some cases be subjective. A subjective fact can communicate how someone is feeling. If you tell someone that you are feeling sad, that is a subjective fact about your emotional state. On the other hand if I tell you that you are sad, this statement would qualify only as my opinion regardless of whether it is true.
A fact can safely be defined as a true belief. Because belief is synonymous with opinion, one who makes a factual statement also holds an opinion that the fact is true. Therefore all facts are accompanied by an opinion though opinions do not require facts to be held as true by those who believe them; hence the statement that everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
Discerning fact from opinion is often difficult, and for centuries philosophers have been trying to discover what can actually qualify as a fact rather than an opinion. This branch of philosophy is called epistemology, the study of the limits of what human beings can know for fact. Additionally, all of the modern sciences rest on the foundation of discerning fact from opinion and methodically aim to find true knowledge or fact.
It is difficult to claim that something is a fact when it is not clearly obvious, such as biological differences in gender, because facts are often proven to be wrong. For example, centuries ago the world was thought to be flat and this was held as fact by the majority of people. As we now know, the world is in fact round so the former statement is demoted to an outdated opinion. From this example we can see that those who thought that the earth was not flat were initially communicating an opinion that was eventually found to be true, which shows that a fact can almost always be challenged.
Best answer:
Answer by Hector Well the FACT is this question is too long and in my OPINION should be much shorter.
Question by chevyloo487: Whats the difference between Religion and Philosophy?
I mea think about it we think these things are good, these things are bad, we should do this so often. Even thinking about a higher power is a philosophical debate, so whats the difference between religion nd philosophy.
Best answer:
Answer by pab philosophy says that there is nothing taken for granted…there is no default answer, nothing that shouldn’t be questioned
religion very much does not say that
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Question by Katie: What is the difference between an skeptic and a cynic?
I’m understanding that a skeptic is someone who believes that the argument for or against anything is equal, and that anything could turn out to be false so it’s best not to believe anything. Also, that truth is relative and that “this is how something appears to me”. Am I correct in what a skeptic is?
With a cynic its harder for me. I’m not talking modern day definitions, I need to know what the difference was between Greek philosophers that were cynics and skeptics.
By the way – this isn’t homework. I’m studying for an exam and need clarification. Thanks to anyone that can help!
Best answer:
Answer by guardianofzeunknown a person who believes that only selfishness motivates human actions and who disbelieves in or minimizes selfless acts or disinterested points of view.
AKA Cynics only make decision in their self interest
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Question by Katie: What is the difference between an skeptic and a cynic?
I’m understanding that a skeptic is someone who believes that the argument for or against anything is equal, and that anything could turn out to be false so it’s best not to believe anything. Also, that truth is relative and that “this is how something appears to me”. Am I correct in what a skeptic is?
With a cynic its harder for me. I’m not talking modern day definitions, I need to know what the difference was between Greek philosophers that were cynics and skeptics.
By the way – this isn’t homework. I’m studying for an exam and need clarification. Thanks to anyone that can help!
Best answer:
Answer by guardianofzeunknown a person who believes that only selfishness motivates human actions and who disbelieves in or minimizes selfless acts or disinterested points of view.
AKA Cynics only make decision in their self interest
Question by aedgagt: Whats the difference between philosophy and religion?
Best answer:
Answer by Phil S A philosophy is an outlook on life and how to live it. A religion is a set of beliefs regarding one or more deities. Most religions come with a philosophy (a view on how you should live) but philosophies dont come with a religion.
Whenever individuals explore and analyze religion, one common, but unfortunate word people use is,‘cult’. Whenever people don’t like religious or spiritual groups, it’s not uncommon to bring up the word ‘cult’, with no real comprehension of the difference those and legitimate organized religions. The reason for this is actually very simple to see.
For example, in the event you fail to follow Christian Biblical concepts strictly, the Christian Protestant Fundamentalists think you a cult. Although they perhaps originally intended that to demean only those Christian denominations that somehow “were misguided”, that definition now extends clearly also includes Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, … In fact, because at least 2/3 of the world’s population doesn’t identify with any sort of Christian, almost 70% of all of us are therefore ‘members of a cult’.
But, the problem goes even deeper than that. The Protestant fundamentalists have continued to expand their cult list by including Roman Catholics along with all Easter Orthodox faiths, over a disagreement over the number of sacraments there are. By those standards, 93% of the people on the planet are involved in cults. To take it 1 step further, they also think most other Christian Protestant groups to have fallen out of compliance with biblical fidelity. So, for these men and women, virtually the only singular group of people on the planet who aren’t in a cult is them!
Whenever different groups examine these extraordinarily strict doctrinal interpretations, they frequently believe that anyone following them has lost all individualized thought, and must therefore be a member of a cult. To much of the rest of the planet, it’s actually these biblically strict, narrow groups who are the true cults. Taken together, that includes everybody. Everyone on the planet is a member of a cult — according to somebody! The Baptists are pointing fingers at the Catholics who are pointing fingers at the Protestants – and everyone is pointing fingers at the Mormons.
Whenever you paint anything with such a broad brush, it’s pointless; as Joey on ‘Friends’ once said, “The point is Moo — because who cares what a cow thinks?
So, is there any way to redeem the word, so it can have some meaning of value? The main issue is that those who are creating the definitions are lacking neutrality. They’ve got an agenda. The thing we need is someone else to give us a neutral means to identify a cult — someone without a personal interest in the decision. That individual can be the ‘anthropologist of religion’.
An anthropologist of religion is someone who studies the field of religion from a scientific standpoint. Sometimes they’ve got a particular religion to which they adhere, and other times they don’t. This will make some members from the organized religions rather uncomfortable. If the anthropologist belongs to a religion — any religion — the other people scream “bias! bias!”, and everything the anthropologist has to say must be wrong because they’ve got this personal bias.|If it happens that the individual belongs to a particular religion, all the others shout, ‘Bias! Bias! — and ignores anything stated.
If, on the other hand, the anthropologist doesn’t take part in any specific religion, the others scream “atheist! atheist!”, and everything this anthropologist says has got to be biased on the fact that they’re simply opposed to all religious beliefs. Drama and accusation aside, how do these neutral parties define cults?
Usually, the majority of them define a cult by using a specific ‘five point system’. The answers to the the following questions will make it clear whether or not the group is a cult.
These are:
1. Does the group have a charismatic, strong leader (or leaders)
Two. Does the group squash individuality as well as independent thought?
3. Is there a denial of intimacy by excluding or alienating friends or relatives?
Four. Do they apply financial pressure and abuse for the welfare of the group, even at the personal expense of the adherent?
Five. Does the group keep its members separated from their surrounding community?
Even using this approach, the problem is that it still isn’t black and white. If all 5 questions are answered “yes”, then it easily qualifies as being a cult. Obviously, if every one of the answers is no, then it’s absolutely NOT a cult. If it were only The hard part is when, as is the case with most groups, the answer is “yes” to a number of questions between those two extremes. you are unlikely to find any solid answers, so the best we can do is really a sort of sliding scale.
It’s always easy to handle to fully grasp with a real-life situation.
One Case Study of a Cult — The People’s Temple. This is the title of the church founded by the Reverend James Warren “Jim” Jones — over nine hundred folks that committed suicide in Jonestown, Guyana back in 1978.
Ask yourself those aforementioned five questions:
(a). They had Jones as a leader – strong and charismatic.
(b) they thought as a group and weren’t allowed to have any ideas to call their own.
(c) they ended encouraged strongly to exclude their friends as well as relatives from every aspect of their lives and their church activities.
(d) The members more than tithed, they basically gifted all everything they owned to the church, and were in turn cared for by the church (the group was entirely communist);
(e) When their isolation from the surrounding community began to break down, they relocated to a remote spot inside the jungles of South America.
All five factors had been met, so they clearly were a cult.
A 2nd Case Study – Jehovah’s Witnesses. Founded in the late 1800s by Charles Taze Russell, these are the folks that you are likely to come across when they knock on your door.
Let’s compare them to the same five questions:
(a) They do not have a particular leader, strong or otherwise.
(b) They believe that as a result of independent bible study, everybody will eventually come to the same conclusions that they have.
(c) Witnesses ask people they don’t know as well as relatives to teach what they think they have learned;
(d) While it’s frequently true that Witnesses devote a lot of their time and effort trying to convert others, there does not appear to be any monetary pressure – not any more so than any other church encourages tithing.
(e) It’s their lack of separation from the nearby community that often has them at odds with their neighbors.
They meet none of the criteria. Jehovah’s Witnesses are definitely not a cult.
Bottom Line: determining properly whether a group is a cult is unrelated to their biblical interpretations, and needs to instead be determined by sociological criteria unrelated to the religious position of the group. Whether cults are dangerous or not depends on which cult. Just because it’s a cult, does not make it automatically dangerous, but any one or any thing that discourages independent thought, is ultimately bad for you.
This is an excerpt of 1 lesson (of 30) from the Master of Religious Philosophy course offered through the Universal Life Church Seminary. We have many courses available and each one carries with it a degree at the end of the course.
Kevin is a student of psychology and spiritual studies and a minister at the Universal Life Church .
Stefan Molyneux, host of Freedomain Radio, the largest and most popular philosophy show on the web, answers questions submitted through YouTube — www.freedomainradio.com
Question by I Love you all: What is Difference Between Philosophy and Religion ? what is Defination of Religion ?
does religion is part of Philosophy ?
many times we study buddhist philosophy and same things came under buddhist religion also
many times in indian Philosophy we study gita,Upnishad they are part of Philosophy as we as HINDUISM
i not get difference between religion and Philosophy
Best answer:
Answer by Chimpanzer Tank!! English should be a large factor in both of them
Defination of philosophy: doctrine: a belief (or system of beliefs) accepted as authoritative by some group or school
the rational investigation of questions about existence and knowledge and ethics
Definaition of religion: a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
