Posts Tagged ‘Ethics’

Best exponents of modern ethics?

Sunday, October 16th, 2011

Question by : Best exponents of modern ethics?
By modern ethics I mean the ethic models usually accepted as paramount in today’s society (which usually hold other theories such as pragmatism, hedonism, utilitarianism, etc. as their opposites in a way).

Which philosophers have contributed the most and delved the most into these ethical theories and which of their works (writings) are the most useful to comprehend their reasoning?

Best answer:

Answer by Terrance Wilson
All has distributed equal weight

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Introduction to Political Philosophy (PLSC 114) In this last session on the Republic, the emphasis is on the idea of self-control, as put forward by Adeimantus in his speech. Socrates asserts that the most powerful passion one needs to learn how to tame is what he calls thumos. Used to denote “spiritedness” and “desire,” it is associated with ambitions for public life that both virtuous statesmen as well as great tyrants may pursue. The lecture ends with the platonic idea of justice as harmony in the city and the soul. 00:00 – Chapter 1. The Control of Passions 08:53 – Chapter 2. A Proposal for the Construction of KallipolIs 17:34 – Chapter 3. Justice 26:28 – Chapter 4. The Philosopher-King 33:26 – Chapter 5. What Are Plato’s Views on Modern America? Complete course materials are available at the Open Yale Courses website: open.yale.edu This course was recorded in Fall 2006.

Related Modern Philosophers Articles

Best exponents of modern ethics?

Sunday, October 16th, 2011

Question by : Best exponents of modern ethics?
By modern ethics I mean the ethic models usually accepted as paramount in today’s society (which usually hold other theories such as pragmatism, hedonism, utilitarianism, etc. as their opposites in a way).

Which philosophers have contributed the most and delved the most into these ethical theories and which of their works (writings) are the most useful to comprehend their reasoning?

Best answer:

Answer by Terrance Wilson
All has distributed equal weight

Give your answer to this question below!

Related Modern Philosophers Articles

The Ethics of the Greek Philosophers, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle: A Lecture Given Before the Brooklyn Ethical Association, Season of 1896-1897

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

Product Description
Originally published in 1903. This volume from the Cornell University Library’s print collections was scanned on an APT BookScan and converted to JPG 2000 format by Kirtas Technologies. All titles scanned cover to cover and pages may include marks notations and other marginalia present in the original volume…. More >>

The Ethics of the Greek Philosophers, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle: A Lecture Given Before the Brooklyn Ethical Association, Season of 1896-1897

What were hegel’s views on epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics.?

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

I cannot figure out what Hegel’s views on epistemology , ethics, and metaphysics were. Anyone have any insight?

From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Product Description
Frank Jackson champions the cause of conceptual analysis as central to philosophical inquiry. In recent years conceptual analysis has been undervalued and widely misunderstood, suggests Jackson. He argues that such analysis is mistakenly clouded in mystery, preventing a whole range of important questions from being productively addressed. He anchors his argument in discussions of specific philosophical issues, starting with the metaphysical doctrine of physicalism … More >>

From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis

What is the connection bewteen ethics and metaphysics and buddhism?

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Im trying to write a research paper on buddhism and in my outline it says to introduce the concept of ethics and metaphysics. I have the definitions but im not really sure what it really means and how to introduce the concept

Ethics and Reality

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Ethics and Reality
by Tatiana Velitchkov © 2009

The attempt to reconcile the good for the individual with the good for all is the most pervasive problems in theoretical ethics. It is a problem which emerges in current discussions between purpose and rationalism and in more customary debate between relativism and absolutism. A crucial cause of this complexity arises from a failure to position ethics in metaphysics.

Ethics decision making is a process that involves agents choosing actions. An ethical action takes place as the extinction of events which can add to the action in many ways. It is never a lonely incidence nor is it made in an identical context to any other ethical conclusion. Ethical actions must occur in a context in which many likely actions could take place. Actions which could not have been made are not ethical decisions at all.

Ethical positions enable us to review a given action’s possessions for Goodness, previous to that deed being done. The position enables an individual to determine the good condition between two or more given options. The fortitude of whether or not a good action is presented remains with the argent. Once the action has been done, its determination is established and the deed becomes an aspect contributing to additional actions and entities. When one action donates to another action or unit then it is functioning in it.

Reality is what boxes an individual on the ear. The mirage, the capture, is to gaze beyond this, to look towards the innermost kernel. The outer husk is the deepest kernel while the look is the reality. An individual himself is real, the critical nature of reality though he or she must be smacked on the ears to be reminded of what is already known. Spiritual respect is an ever-greater embedded ness in the planet. Spiritual transcendence is only realized in total immanence, flee, avoidance, rejection are all impossible. That one is actual and here, that the place too is actual that is enlightenment.

To state that we are real is the same as saying there is no deep difference between looks and actuality though individuals experience numerous piecemeal delusions. The believe that we are not equipment of the sort that cars and trees are is the theoretical expression of a self loathing so deep and so complete that it must reject what is absolutely the case, a self loathing so powerful and so detailed that it seeks to wipe out every piece of the self that is reviled.

Much of the history of philosophy and of religion is pathological, much of it is a wrestle, an obvious wrestle just as the life of the researcher or the priest is a long wrestle from the actual world.

Branches of Philosophy

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

Branches of Philosophy
by Tatiana Velitchkov © 2009

Philosophy is a Subject based on the Comprehensive Study of the Human Existence. Philosophy’s basic objective is to obtain a comprehensive justification of logical inferences, true human values, logical criteria for knowledge development and comprehensive interpretation of human life relative to nature. It also involves deep analysis of human problems in relation their social way of life and natural inhabitance. Philosophy always demands very deep and comprehensive studies on human life, nature and reality based on a subject of comprehensive study. Students of Philosophy are usually advised to be prepared for engagement in deep commitment during their studies.

Philosophy is a very unique field of study. It is unique in its subject content as field of study. It is also very far fetched in the methods of study that is applicable. Philosophy has a set of question for every situation experienced in the human life. It deeply examines logics, concepts and views drawn from science, art, religion, politics any field. In Philosophy the Theory of reality is called Metaphysics. The theory of knowledge is called Epistemology. The theory of moral values is called Ethics. The theory of legal rights and government is called Politics. The theory of arts is called Aesthetics.

There are other diversified systems of that also seek philosophical study, guidance and redress. The most common is religion. Religions like as Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism. What makes all these religions different is their difference in philosophy. They may be similar is some of the subject they address but they are very different in the method in which they address the issues. The way they address their mythic stories, the lessons taught, the beliefs and all the teachings taught are based on the philosophical approach. A philosophical study would reveal the method and the approach that each religion use to address a fundamental issue.

The foundation of philosophy was based on five major subjects. The first subject was logic. Logic is a study aimed at providing methods for clearly distinguishing between good and bad reasoning. The second subject is Ethics. Ethics is based on the study of addressing moral concepts such as actions, obligations, and justice that are based on the principles that guide moral decisions. Metaphysics is another subject of Philosophy. This subject analyses physical value to determine which one is physically relation to the human way of understanding. The other complex subject of philosophical study is Epistemology. This study is based on the study of the scope of knowledge relative to the human understanding. It justifies beliefs that go beyond the knowledge of the human understanding. The last Subject is the History of Philosophy. This study of Historical trends related to philosophy.