Atheists : Do you agree that Hinduism is better than Christianity?
Wednesday, December 7th, 2011Question by Randy: Atheists : Do you agree that Hinduism is better than Christianity?
The ancient hindus were skeptics, intellectuals, thinkers, mathematicians, astronomers, and scientists.
The ancient hindus invented 0 and gave us the hindu-arabic numeral system that we use today. They predicted the earth to be approximately 4.32 billion years old. They believed in the heliocentric model of the solar system and many more. Some of the great minds were also atheists(See Cavarka School). Ancient organised atheistic thought came from ancient India and from the ancient hindus!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cārvāka#Beliefs
In fact it is said in the Rig Veda
Neither being (sat) nor non-being was as yet. What was concealed? And where? And in whose protection?…Who really knows? Who can declare it? Whence was it born, and whence came this creation? The devas were born later than this world’s creation, so who knows from where it came into existence? None can know from where creation has arisen, and whether he has or has not produced it. He who surveys it in the highest heavens, he alone knows-or perhaps does not know. (Rig Veda 10. 129)
Swami Vivekananda on Evolution :
There seems to be a great difference between modern science and all religions at this point. Every religion has the idea that the universe comes out of intelligence. The theory of God, taking it in its psychological significance, apart from all ideas of personality, is that intelligence is first in the order of creation, and that out of intelligence comes what we call gross matter. Modern philosophers say that intelligence is the last to come. They say that unintelligent things slowly evolve into animals, and from animals into men. They claim that instead of everything coming out of intelligence, intelligence itself is the last to come. Both the religious and the scientific statements, though seeming directly opposed to each other are true. Take an infinite series, A—B—A—B —A—B. etc. The question is — which is first, A or B? If you take the series as A—B. you will say that A is first, but if you take it as B—A, you will say that B is first. It depends upon the way we look at it. Intelligence undergoes modification and becomes the gross matter, this again merges into intelligence, and thus the process goes on. The Sankhyas, and other religionists, put intelligence first, and the series becomes intelligence, then matter. The scientific man puts his finger on matter, and says matter, then intelligence. They both indicate the same chain. Indian philosophy, however, goes beyond both intelligence and matter, and finds a Purusha, or Self, which is beyond intelligence, of which intelligence is but the borrowed light
THE TAO OF PHYSICS
This idea of a periodically expanding and contracting universe, which involves a scale of time and space of vast proportions, has arisen not only in modern cosmology, but also in ancient Indian mythology. Experiencing the universe as an organic and rhythmically moving cosmos, the Hindus were able to develop evolutionary cosmologies which come very close to our modern scientific models.
CARL SAGAN’S COSMOS
The Hindu religion is the only one of the world’s great faiths dedicated to the idea that the Cosmos itself undergoes an immense, indeed an infinite, number of deaths and rebirths. It is the only religion in which time scales correspond to those of modern scientific cosmology. Its cycles run from our ordinary day and night to a day and night of Brahma, 8.64 billion years long, longer than the age of the Earth or the Sun and about half the time since the Big Bang
Best answer:
Answer by Your Friend
Well, you know I won’t read this…
Give your answer to this question below!

9th Annual Dimitris & Irmgard Pallas Modern Greek Lecture: ON GREEK FRIENDSHIP Professor Gregory Jusdanis, Ohio State University Presented by the University of Michigan Classical Studies-Modern Greek Program | January 26, 2011 The Lecture Why do we distrust friendship? In contrast to classical authors, modern writers regard friendship with misgivings or indifference. Indeed, until recently philosophers, sociologists, anthropologists, psychologists and literary critics have done little work on friendship. Only literary writers have paid any attention to it in the twentieth century. Literature, in other words, has been virtually alone to host friendship in any significant way.
Video Rating: 0 / 5


