<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosophers Chair &#187; knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephilosopherschair.com/tag/knowledge/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com</link>
	<description>... Our views on philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do ancient philosophers&#8217; theories of knowledge still influence us today?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2783-do-ancient-philosophers-theories-of-knowledge-still-influence-us-today</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2783-do-ancient-philosophers-theories-of-knowledge-still-influence-us-today#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 03:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Modern Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[still]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/2783-do-ancient-philosophers-theories-of-knowledge-still-influence-us-today</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question by c.linic_al: Do ancient philosophers&#8217; theories of knowledge still influence us today? For example, Plato&#8217;s &#8216;Ideas&#8217; and his Allegory of the Cave &#8211; does it in any way resonate in our modern lives? Best answer: Answer by joe carpenterYes, absolutely, of course they do. People have not changed. Give your answer to this question [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><i>Question by c.linic_al</i>: Do ancient philosophers&#8217; theories of knowledge still influence us today?</strong><br />
For example, Plato&#8217;s &#8216;Ideas&#8217; and his Allegory of the Cave &#8211; does it  in any way resonate in our modern lives?</p>
<p><strong>Best answer:</strong></p>
<p><i>Answer by joe carpenter</i><br />Yes, absolutely, of course they do.  People have not changed.</p>
<p><strong>Give your answer to this question below!</strong></p>
<p>Find More <a href="http://thephilosopherschair.com/view/modern-philosophers">Modern Philosophers Articles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2783-do-ancient-philosophers-theories-of-knowledge-still-influence-us-today/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>118.1 Part I. of Presenting Employed Integrated Philosophy as opposed to Myriads of Tiny Domains of expert knowledge</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2665-118-1-part-i-of-presenting-employed-integrated-philosophy-as-opposed-to-myriads-of-tiny-domains-of-expert-knowledge</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2665-118-1-part-i-of-presenting-employed-integrated-philosophy-as-opposed-to-myriads-of-tiny-domains-of-expert-knowledge#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[118.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myriads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/2665-118-1-part-i-of-presenting-employed-integrated-philosophy-as-opposed-to-myriads-of-tiny-domains-of-expert-knowledge</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m ﻿making an attempt﻿ ﻿in order to﻿ ﻿gain﻿ some ﻿momentum﻿ ﻿with regard﻿ ﻿to﻿ ﻿guiding﻿ ﻿our﻿ ﻿society ﻿clear﻿ ﻿of﻿ a ﻿very﻿ ﻿frequently﻿ ﻿applied﻿ ﻿systems﻿ ﻿when﻿ ﻿it﻿ is about ﻿understanding﻿ ﻿things﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿life﻿ ﻿and﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿principal﻿ ﻿moving﻿ ﻿﻿energies﻿. Albeit﻿ ﻿that we﻿ ﻿shall﻿ ﻿subsequently﻿ ﻿need﻿ ﻿a﻿ closer ﻿look﻿ in to ﻿this specific﻿ ﻿matter﻿, ﻿I﻿ ﻿would﻿ ﻿wish﻿ ﻿to﻿ give [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ﻿making an attempt﻿ ﻿in order to﻿ ﻿gain﻿ some ﻿momentum﻿ ﻿with regard﻿ ﻿to﻿ ﻿guiding﻿ ﻿our﻿ ﻿society ﻿clear﻿ ﻿of﻿ a ﻿very﻿ ﻿frequently﻿ ﻿applied﻿ ﻿systems﻿ ﻿when﻿ ﻿it﻿ is about ﻿understanding﻿ ﻿things﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿life﻿ ﻿and﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿principal﻿ ﻿moving﻿ ﻿﻿energies﻿. Albeit﻿ ﻿that we﻿ ﻿shall﻿ ﻿subsequently﻿ ﻿need﻿ ﻿a﻿ closer ﻿look﻿ in to ﻿this specific﻿ ﻿matter﻿, ﻿I﻿ ﻿would﻿ ﻿wish﻿ ﻿to﻿ give ﻿you﻿ ﻿a﻿ ﻿brief﻿ ﻿reference﻿ ﻿in advance﻿. The basic mechanism that we are dealing with here is a division ﻿of﻿ ﻿all of our﻿ ﻿entire﻿ ﻿existence﻿, ﻿even﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿entire world﻿ if ﻿we could﻿, into ﻿countless﻿ numbers of ﻿ever﻿ ﻿tinier﻿ sub-divisions, ﻿smaller﻿ ﻿subjects﻿ ﻿which﻿ ﻿nevertheless﻿ ﻿remain﻿ ﻿everlasting﻿ ﻿parts﻿ ﻿﻿﻿of﻿﻿﻿ ﻿﻿﻿the﻿﻿﻿ ﻿cosmos﻿ as a whole.</p>
<p>This might particularly bring about the outcome that folks that concentrate on one or some of the smaller sup-domains of sciences, are starting to discover that what is actually enveloping us with an ever smaller perspective and shall come up with more and more reasonings which look perfect just then and inside their own assembly of experts, but from the all natural standpoint, it will expose that their extremely restricted standpoint and intensely small minded theories are damaging, and some could as well say that their theories are fatally destructive to us humans on one hand and the natural balance of all things in general.</p>
<p>One of the coming phenomenons is widely known as the: &#8220;Fallacy of Composition&#8221; which implies that the end result, produced by limited info only, when compared with full information, is usually inaccurate and if such findings in some cases are correct, seen as a happenstance. This usually leads to a very senseless and risky confrontation between the delegates of the most illiberal convictions that are attained via such myopia . As well﻿ ﻿it﻿ ﻿creates﻿ ﻿that﻿ ﻿inviting﻿ ﻿option﻿ ﻿in order to﻿ ﻿state﻿ ﻿things﻿ ﻿having﻿ ﻿very little﻿ ﻿substance ﻿﻿but﻿ ﻿credibly﻿ ﻿explained﻿ ﻿for﻿ ﻿many of﻿ ﻿those﻿ ﻿that﻿ ﻿don&#8217;t﻿ have much ﻿or any﻿ wisdom at all.</p>
<p>          ]]&gt;</p>
<p>Routinely﻿ ﻿during﻿ ﻿politically﻿ ﻿correct﻿ ﻿conditions﻿, ﻿meaning﻿ ﻿during﻿ ﻿times﻿ ﻿with﻿ ﻿exploited﻿ ﻿as well as﻿ ﻿publicly﻿ ﻿respected﻿ &#8220;﻿hypocrisy﻿,&#8221; ﻿this kind of﻿ discrepancies ﻿are actually﻿ ﻿leading to﻿ ﻿mediocre﻿ ﻿compromises﻿, which are going to ﻿hurt﻿ ﻿no one﻿ ﻿right away﻿, ﻿yet﻿ ﻿often,﻿ ﻿all of us﻿ ﻿in the long run﻿. Yet﻿ ﻿not one﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿problems﻿ ﻿has been﻿ ﻿openly﻿ ﻿named﻿, ﻿let alone﻿ ﻿that﻿ ﻿any﻿ ﻿true﻿ ﻿and / or﻿ ﻿suitable﻿ ﻿resolutions﻿ ﻿are usually﻿ ﻿achieved﻿. Certainly﻿ ﻿the true﻿ ﻿dilemma﻿ ﻿is﻿ ﻿not just﻿ ﻿in﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿niche﻿ ﻿for﻿ ﻿all of our﻿ ﻿cultural﻿ ﻿systems﻿ ﻿towards﻿ ﻿small﻿ ﻿sections﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿expertise﻿ ﻿and / or﻿ ﻿with﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿splitting﻿ up ﻿of﻿ ﻿tasks﻿, ﻿activities﻿ and ﻿subjects﻿ ﻿into﻿ ﻿always﻿ ﻿tinier﻿ niches. One particular ﻿dilemma﻿ ﻿has become﻿ ﻿for example﻿ ﻿that﻿ ﻿universal﻿ natural ﻿laws﻿ ﻿are﻿ ﻿quite﻿ ﻿regularly﻿ ﻿not﻿ ﻿respected﻿, ﻿now and again﻿ not even ﻿realized﻿ ﻿and﻿ ﻿consequently﻿ ﻿not﻿ ﻿properly﻿ ﻿followed﻿.</p>
<p>The ﻿experts﻿ ﻿and﻿ ﻿their own﻿ ﻿specialized﻿ ﻿expertise﻿, ﻿are actually﻿ strangling ﻿the﻿ basic ﻿integrated﻿ ﻿structure﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿mother nature﻿ ﻿by means of﻿ applying ﻿ideas﻿, which ﻿are﻿ ﻿typically﻿ ﻿and also﻿ ﻿too much﻿ ﻿influenced﻿ ﻿by﻿ the &#8220;special interests&#8221; of only ﻿a handful﻿ ﻿and﻿ ﻿inspired﻿ ﻿by﻿ ﻿elite﻿ ﻿groups of people﻿, ﻿which generally﻿ ﻿are﻿ ﻿related﻿ ﻿to﻿ ﻿a mixture of﻿ ﻿fields of expertise﻿ of our social ﻿structures﻿. ﻿Excellent﻿ ﻿would﻿ ﻿be﻿ ﻿to﻿ ﻿clear﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿way﻿ ﻿for﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿principles﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿greater﻿ ﻿system﻿ which is the ﻿cosmos﻿ ﻿﻿of﻿ ﻿which﻿ all of us ﻿are﻿ ﻿a﻿ ﻿part﻿, ﻿whether﻿ ﻿some of us﻿ accept ﻿it﻿ ﻿or﻿ not. A ﻿relatively﻿ ﻿modest﻿ ﻿total﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿experts﻿ ﻿who really﻿ ﻿are﻿ ﻿pushed﻿ ﻿in﻿ a more than ﻿healthy﻿ ﻿extent﻿ ﻿by﻿ ﻿their﻿ ﻿own﻿ EGOs, ﻿establish﻿ ﻿behaviors﻿ ﻿that﻿ ﻿will﻿ ﻿be﻿ ﻿taking place﻿, ﻿and also﻿ ﻿they﻿ ﻿do it﻿ ﻿containing﻿ ﻿a nearly﻿ ﻿100%﻿ ﻿risk﻿ ﻿that﻿ ﻿the﻿ ﻿entire﻿ structure, the fundamental ﻿universal﻿ concept, in segments or ﻿in its entirety﻿, ﻿shall﻿ ﻿sooner﻿ ﻿﻿or﻿﻿ ﻿later﻿ ﻿﻿disintegrate﻿, ﻿﻿﻿at least some﻿ ﻿parts﻿ ﻿of﻿ ﻿it﻿ which﻿ ﻿will﻿ show to be ﻿relevant﻿ ﻿for﻿ the world.</p>
<p>For more detailed information about this topic please have a look into the following site with more information about &#8220;Applied Integrated Philosophy&#8221; : http://philosophy.net.magnamentis.com/ !</p>
<p>For information about my work in other fields, feel free to check my new platform with interesting topics about</p>
<p>&#8220;Ethics &amp; Philosophy&#8221; as well as know-how and ideas for various technologies at : http://magnamentis.com !</p>
<p>My Name is Peter G. Keller and I am a philosopher, further working as business consultant and a computer consultant for mac users on one hand and for smartphone users who are using iOS or the Symbian operating system on the other hand.</p>
<p>I am working mostly from home. Currently I&#8217;m working on various books about &#8220;Ethics &amp; Applied Integrated Philosophy&#8221;. My hobbies are motorbiking, windsurfing &amp; piloting floatplanes.</p>
<div>
<p>Peter G. Keller is a consultant who works mostly from home. He is currently working on various philosophy books. His hobbies are motorbiking, windsurfing &amp; piloting floatplanes.</p>
</div>
<p>				<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rbjp9PrtPS8?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
				<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rbjp9PrtPS8?fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<div style="float:left;margin:5px;"><img src=http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rbjp9PrtPS8/default.jpg /></div>
<p>Thanks to the generosity of Howard and Roberta Ahmanson, Biola hosted Dr. Plantinga for a special philosophy lecture and Q&#038;A open to all. Since 1982, Dr. Alvin Plantinga was the John A. O&#8217;Brian Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame until his retirement this year in May. Over his long and seasoned career, Dr. Plantinga has taught or lectured at Calvin College, Yale University, Harvard University, Boston University, Syracuse University and several other colleges and universities. He has authored or edited over a dozen books in philosophy, and several dozen more in top-tiered philosophy publications in the US and in the UK Cosponsored with Biola&#8217;s graduate and undergraduate philosophy departments and Talbot&#8217;s Philosophical Society.<br />
<strong>Video Rating: 4 / 5</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2665-118-1-part-i-of-presenting-employed-integrated-philosophy-as-opposed-to-myriads-of-tiny-domains-of-expert-knowledge/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dangerous Knowledge (chap 1of2) = Pt 2 of 5 &#8211; BBC</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1289-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-2-of-5-bbc</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1289-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-2-of-5-bbc#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1of2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/1289-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-2-of-5-bbc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DANGEROUS KNOWLEDGE (chapter 1 or 2) &#8211; BBC: In this one-off documentary, David Malone looks at four brilliant mathematicians &#8211; Georg Cantor, Ludwig Boltzmann, Kurt Gödel and Alan Turing &#8211; whose genius has profoundly affected us, but which tragically drove them insane and eventually led to them all committing suicide. The film begins with Georg [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ur0N_OAekcI?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ur0N_OAekcI?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
DANGEROUS KNOWLEDGE (chapter 1 or 2) &#8211; BBC: In this one-off documentary, David Malone looks at four brilliant mathematicians &#8211; Georg Cantor, Ludwig Boltzmann, Kurt Gödel and Alan Turing &#8211; whose genius has profoundly affected us, but which tragically drove them insane and eventually led to them all committing suicide. The film begins with Georg Cantor, the great mathematician whose work proved to be the foundation for much of the 20th-century mathematics. He believed he was God&#8217;s messenger and was eventually driven insane trying to prove his theories of infinity Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Philipp Cantor (1845-1918) was a mathematician, best known as the creator of set theory, which has become a fundamental theory in mathematics. Cantor established the importance of one-to-one correspondence between sets, defined infinite and well-ordered sets, and proved that the real numbers are &#8220;more numerous&#8221; than the natural numbers. In fact, Cantor&#8217;s theorem implies the existence of an &#8220;infinity of infinities&#8221;. He defined the cardinal and ordinal numbers and their arithmetic. Cantor&#8217;s work is of great philosophical interest, a fact of which he was well aware. Philosophy, religion and Cantor&#8217;s mathematics. The concept of the existence of an actual infinity was an important shared concern within the realms of mathematics, philosophy and religion. Preserving the orthodoxy of the relationship between God and mathematics, although not in the same form as held by his critics, was long a concern <b>&#8230;</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1289-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-2-of-5-bbc/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dangerous Knowledge (chap 1of2) = Pt 1 of 5 &#8211; BBC</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1277-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-1-of-5-bbc</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1277-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-1-of-5-bbc#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 03:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1of2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/1277-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-1-of-5-bbc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DANGEROUS KNOWLEDGE (chapter 1 or 2) &#8211; BBC: In this one-off documentary, David Malone looks at four brilliant mathematicians &#8211; Georg Cantor, Ludwig Boltzmann, Kurt Gödel and Alan Turing &#8211; whose genius has profoundly affected us, but which tragically drove them insane and eventually led to them all committing suicide. The film begins with Georg [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rLLD1P0cYIA?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rLLD1P0cYIA?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
DANGEROUS KNOWLEDGE (chapter 1 or 2) &#8211; BBC: In this one-off documentary, David Malone looks at four brilliant mathematicians &#8211; Georg Cantor, Ludwig Boltzmann, Kurt Gödel and Alan Turing &#8211; whose genius has profoundly affected us, but which tragically drove them insane and eventually led to them all committing suicide. The film begins with Georg Cantor, the great mathematician whose work proved to be the foundation for much of the 20th-century mathematics. He believed he was God&#8217;s messenger and was eventually driven insane trying to prove his theories of infinity Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Philipp Cantor (1845-1918) was a mathematician, best known as the creator of set theory, which has become a fundamental theory in mathematics. Cantor established the importance of one-to-one correspondence between sets, defined infinite and well-ordered sets, and proved that the real numbers are &#8220;more numerous&#8221; than the natural numbers. In fact, Cantor&#8217;s theorem implies the existence of an &#8220;infinity of infinities&#8221;. He defined the cardinal and ordinal numbers and their arithmetic. Cantor&#8217;s work is of great philosophical interest, a fact of which he was well aware. Philosophy, religion and Cantor&#8217;s mathematics. The concept of the existence of an actual infinity was an important shared concern within the realms of mathematics, philosophy and religion. Preserving the orthodoxy of the relationship between God and mathematics, although not in the same form as held by his critics, was long a concern <b>&#8230;</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1277-dangerous-knowledge-chap-1of2-pt-1-of-5-bbc/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can knowledge be advanced without philosophy, religion or science?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/579-can-knowledge-be-advanced-without-philosophy-religion-or-science</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/579-can-knowledge-be-advanced-without-philosophy-religion-or-science#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[without]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/579-can-knowledge-be-advanced-without-philosophy-religion-or-science</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there another way to answer our questions and prosper?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there another way to answer our questions and prosper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/579-can-knowledge-be-advanced-without-philosophy-religion-or-science/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there any way metaphysics research and knowledge can help one get into a higher grad program?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/529-is-there-any-way-metaphysics-research-and-knowledge-can-help-one-get-into-a-higher-grad-program</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/529-is-there-any-way-metaphysics-research-and-knowledge-can-help-one-get-into-a-higher-grad-program#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[into]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[there]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/529-is-there-any-way-metaphysics-research-and-knowledge-can-help-one-get-into-a-higher-grad-program</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Especially psychology? I know alot of authors of metaphysics/healing/alternative healing/astrology are phD holders. Anyone has a clue about this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially psychology?<br />
I know alot of authors of metaphysics/healing/alternative healing/astrology<br />
are phD holders.<br />
Anyone has a clue about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/529-is-there-any-way-metaphysics-research-and-knowledge-can-help-one-get-into-a-higher-grad-program/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is metaphysics? How is it distinct from other areas of knowledge?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/419-what-is-metaphysics-how-is-it-distinct-from-other-areas-of-knowledge</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/419-what-is-metaphysics-how-is-it-distinct-from-other-areas-of-knowledge#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/419-what-is-metaphysics-how-is-it-distinct-from-other-areas-of-knowledge</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is metaphysics distinct from other areas of knowledge? How is it distinct from other kinds of knowing? What specifically!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is metaphysics distinct from other areas of knowledge? How is it distinct from other kinds of knowing? What specifically!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/419-what-is-metaphysics-how-is-it-distinct-from-other-areas-of-knowledge/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/52 queries in 0.164 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 640/742 objects using disk: basic

Served from: thephilosopherschair.com @ 2012-02-08 20:00:24 -->
