| The Philosophers Chair |
| … Our views on philosophy |
Greek Philosophers on eBay:
Diogenes. A novel based on an apocryphal biography of the Greek philosopher 1964
 | US $100.00 (0 Bid) End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:51:20 PDT Bid now | Add to watch list |
 | US $23.32 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:51:20 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $23.32 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Some recent Greek Philosophers auctions on eBay:
NEW The Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers | US $35.21 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $35.21 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Greek Philosophers on eBay:
NEW The Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers | US $35.21 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $35.21 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| US $100.00 (0 Bid) End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:51:20 PDT Bid now | Add to watch list |
Greek Philosophers on eBay:
NEW The Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers
| US $35.21 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $35.21 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
 | US $21.36 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $21.36 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| US $23.32 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:51:20 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $23.32 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Most popular Greek Philosophers eBay auctions:
NEW The Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers
| US $35.21 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $35.21 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| US $21.36 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $21.36 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| US $100.00 (0 Bid) End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:51:20 PDT Bid now | Add to watch list |
Some recent Greek Philosophers auctions on eBay:
NEW The Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers | US $35.21 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $35.21 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Question by : is it possible to make a philosopher’s stone?
i know this question is a little bit kidish but after watching FMA and
studying Chemistry and some other stuff, i came up with this question.
so is it possible to make something like an philosopher’s stone using
today’s modern technology?
Best answer:
Answer by Naguru
Whatever man contemplates or meditates deeply, he will surely get it.
Give your answer to this question below!
Most popular Greek Philosophers eBay auctions:
NEW The Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers
| US $35.21 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $35.21 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| US $21.36 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $21.36 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Some recent Greek Philosophers auctions on eBay:
NEW The Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers | US $35.21 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:44:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $35.21 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Diogenes. A novel based on an apocryphal biography of the Greek philosopher 1964
| US $100.00 (0 Bid) End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:51:20 PDT Bid now | Add to watch list |
| US $23.32 End Date: Friday Mar-30-2012 4:51:20 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $23.32 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Question by Andrea S: Is this evaluation of the views of different philosophers correct?
Heres the question….How would the statement,“Sell all you have and give to the poor” be evaluated according to Kant’s ethics? What would Mill say about it? What would Kierkegaard say? What would Nietzsche say? What would Sartre say?
and the following is my answer….please give me advice and constructive critisism to make it better if need be… I realize its just kind of a rough draft, but its late and I just needed to get the majority of the answer done….(also i don’t need help with grammar and stuff even though its not good right now…. I just really want someone to evaluate whether my answer sounds good!)
According to Kant’s ethics when we do something we mustn’t do it because of personal preferences, or from gaining or loosing from moral calculations. Kant believes that we can only receive moral credit when we follow the moral law. Kant believed that the moral value of something is always determined by the principle. This basically means if you mean well then no matter what happens you are worthy of praise. But, the most important part of Kant’s philosophy when it comes to this question is what he calls categorical imperative which means that we should only act if we think the principle/statement should apply to all people. This being said I believe that Kant would not agree with this statement. If all people gave all their money to the poor we would end up no better off, in fact the world would be in the same situation that it was in before. Also, I believe that Kant would argue that not all people should receive large amounts of money because they may not be able to handle it well. Basically because this statement should not apply to everyone he would not agree. But if somebody did do it with good intentions then they are worthy of praise and if they did it with bad intentions, for example to keep the money away from their ex, then he would find it appalling.
If someone asked what Mill thought of this statement he would have a different answer than Kant. Mill believed that the only people who could determine if a something was better or worse were people who experienced both pleasures. Mill most likely would have argued that there is no way of knowing whether having more money is better or worse, so if we give all our money to the poor to help them or make them happier, it may not be worth it because it may not make them happier. Also, Mill would have looked at this question and tried to be as impartial as possible. He believed in the greater good for the majority of the population. He would have looked at this question and realized that this would not help the greater good of the population because the rich would now become poor and the problem would still remain, making the situation no better that it was before.
Kierkegaard would also have a different way of analyzing this question. Kierkegaard believed in something which he called the ‘crowd’. He believed that modern people had become dull and mediocre because of their constant striving to be like everyone else. This is what he referred to as the crowd and most likely Kierkegaard would have seen this statement as a way for the poor to be like the rich and follow what the experts think should be done. He would also realize that once the poor received the money that the new poor class would then strive to be like the rich, or the ‘crowd’ Kierkegaard would not have favored this statement because he would feel was brought on by the evermore increasingly dull modern society.
Nietzsche’s reaction to this statement would be different yet again. Nietzsche believed that moral codes reduce our passions and they only replicate the desires and perspectives of those who make them. Thus, Nietzsche would not have felt have any moral duty to give to the poor. He also would say that this statement is the weak trying to convince the powerful that they need to take care of them something which he referred to as slave morality. So in the end Nietzche would not agree with this statement.
Finally, Sartre would evaluate this statement by referring to his believe that we are all condemned to be free. Sartre believed that everyone was free to choice what they want. He would state that the poor chose to be poor and the rich chose to be rich. Ultimately, Sartre would blame the poor for their social situation and would not feel sorry for them. Sartre would not agree with this statement.
Best answer:
Answer by jackmcdoodle
no philosophers are just f uck ing retards
Give your answer to this question below!
