<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosophers Chair &#187; Said</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephilosopherschair.com/tag/said/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com</link>
	<description>... Our views on philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Which modern philosopher said&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2811-which-modern-philosopher-said</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2811-which-modern-philosopher-said#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Modern Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosopher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Said]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/2811-which-modern-philosopher-said</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question by David G: Which modern philosopher said&#8230;? (in a qualification of the Golden Rule) that the only law one was morally permitted to advocate was one under which one would be willingly agnostic a priori as to one&#8217;s eventual societal place under the application of the law? In other words, if you&#8217;re not willing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><i>Question by David G</i>: Which modern philosopher said&#8230;?</strong><br />
(in a qualification of the Golden Rule) that the only law one was morally permitted to advocate was one under which one would be willingly agnostic a priori as to one&#8217;s eventual societal place under the application of the law? In other words, if you&#8217;re not willing to exempt yourself from the provisions of a a law, do  not support it.<br />
Arrgh, yes, I meant &#8216;include oneself in the provisons of&#8217;, not &#8216;exempt one from&#8217;. Sorry</p>
<p><strong>Best answer:</strong></p>
<p><i>Answer by Ray</i><br />Are you asking the question to find the answer, or to find if someone else, along with yourself, knows the answer?</p>
<p><strong>Add your own answer in the comments!</strong></p>
<p>More <a href="http://thephilosopherschair.com/view/modern-philosophers">Modern Philosophers Articles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2811-which-modern-philosopher-said/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hindu and Buddhist traditions had already said all about what the modern philosophers tried to say?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2525-the-hindu-and-buddhist-traditions-had-already-said-all-about-what-the-modern-philosophers-tried-to-say</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2525-the-hindu-and-buddhist-traditions-had-already-said-all-about-what-the-modern-philosophers-tried-to-say#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Modern Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[already]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddhist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Said]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[say]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tried]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/2525-the-hindu-and-buddhist-traditions-had-already-said-all-about-what-the-modern-philosophers-tried-to-say</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question by Dave: The Hindu and Buddhist traditions had already said all about what the modern philosophers tried to say? Philosophers like Descartes, Plato, Socrates, Kant and so on came after the Hindu and Vedic traditions and these guys just involuntarily plagiarised philosophies that are said in Hinduism about the nature of reality but these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><i>Question by Dave</i>: The Hindu and Buddhist traditions had already said all about what the modern philosophers tried to say?</strong><br />
Philosophers like Descartes, Plato, Socrates, Kant and so on came after the Hindu and Vedic traditions and these guys just involuntarily plagiarised philosophies that are said in Hinduism about the nature of reality but these modern philosophers get all the credit for what was said in the Vedas and Upanishads. Why is that?</p>
<p><strong>Best answer:</strong></p>
<p><i>Answer by Grip Tail</i><br />arent hindu and buddhist still two of the biggest religions in the world? i think they are getting their credit</p>
<p><strong>Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!</strong></p>
<p>				<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EjWTuF35GtY?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
				<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EjWTuF35GtY?fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>An interesting discussion between two great philosophers of the latter half of the 20th century, exploring topics such as truth, meaning and reference. I apologize for the audio sync. It was a problem with the original file (not that it matters much, the video is simply two old men talking). Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed a distinctive and controversial brand of pragmatism that expressed itself along two main axes. One is negative—a critical diagnosis of what Rorty takes to be defining projects of modern philosophy. The other is positive—an attempt to show what intellectual culture might look like, once we free ourselves from the governing metaphors of mind and knowledge in which the traditional problems of epistemology and metaphysics (and indeed, in Rorty&#8217;s view, the self-conception of modern philosophy) are rooted. plato.stanford.edu en.wikipedia.org Donald Davidson (1917-2003) was one of the most important philosophers of the latter half of the twentieth century. His ideas, presented in a series of essays from the 1960&#8242;s onwards, have been influential across a range of areas from semantic theory through to epistemology and ethics. Davidson&#8217;s work exhibits a breadth of approach, as well as a unitary and systematic character, which is unusual within twentieth century analytic philosophy. plato.stanford.edu en.wikipedia.org<br />
<strong>Video Rating: 4 / 5</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/2525-the-hindu-and-buddhist-traditions-had-already-said-all-about-what-the-modern-philosophers-tried-to-say/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you agree with me if i said that philosophy encompasses the greatest elements of religion, and none of?</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1347-would-you-agree-with-me-if-i-said-that-philosophy-encompasses-the-greatest-elements-of-religion-and-none-of</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1347-would-you-agree-with-me-if-i-said-that-philosophy-encompasses-the-greatest-elements-of-religion-and-none-of#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 02:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encompasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greatest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[none]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Said]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[would]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/1347-would-you-agree-with-me-if-i-said-that-philosophy-encompasses-the-greatest-elements-of-religion-and-none-of</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and none of the worst? Could one consider, perhaps, that philosophy and religion are like two seperate possibilities?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and none of the worst?</p>
<p>Could one consider, perhaps, that philosophy and religion are like two seperate possibilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/1347-would-you-agree-with-me-if-i-said-that-philosophy-encompasses-the-greatest-elements-of-religion-and-none-of/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The God Question: What Famous Thinkers from Plato to Dawkins Have Said About the Divine</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/839-the-god-question-what-famous-thinkers-from-plato-to-dawkins-have-said-about-the-divine</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/839-the-god-question-what-famous-thinkers-from-plato-to-dawkins-have-said-about-the-divine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Said]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinkers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/839-the-god-question-what-famous-thinkers-from-plato-to-dawkins-have-said-about-the-divine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISBN13: 9781851686599 Condition: NEW Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark. Product Description Does God Exist? Without doubt, the greatest question to face humanity in its history, the controversy rages on today with a recent spate of books on both sides of the divide. However, this debate is not a new phenomenon. For centuries, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/God-Question-Famous-Thinkers-Dawkins/dp/1851686592%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI7SWRO5N2Q5AP7XQ%26tag%3Diphogoss-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D1851686592" rel="nofollow"><img style="float:left;margin: 0 20px 10px 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51isUow9khL._SL160_.jpg" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>ISBN13: 9781851686599</li>
<li>Condition: NEW</li>
<li>Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Product Description</b><br />  Does God Exist? Without doubt, the greatest question to face humanity in its history, the controversy rages on today with a recent spate of books on both sides of the divide. However, this debate is not a new phenomenon. For centuries, our greatest philosophers, from Aristotle to Nietzsche, have sought to clarify the idea of a Supreme Being and examine the unique conundrums that He raises.    Revealing the thoughts of history&#8217;s biggest philosophers on the biggest &#8230; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/God-Question-Famous-Thinkers-Dawkins/dp/1851686592%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI7SWRO5N2Q5AP7XQ%26tag%3Diphogoss-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D1851686592" rel="nofollow">More >></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/God-Question-Famous-Thinkers-Dawkins/dp/1851686592%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI7SWRO5N2Q5AP7XQ%26tag%3Diphogoss-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D1851686592" title="The God Question: What Famous Thinkers from Plato to Dawkins Have Said About the Divine" rel="nofollow"><b>The God Question: What Famous Thinkers from Plato to Dawkins Have Said About the Divine</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/839-the-god-question-what-famous-thinkers-from-plato-to-dawkins-have-said-about-the-divine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 336/522 objects using disk: basic

Served from: thephilosopherschair.com @ 2012-05-24 05:32:22 -->
