By Donald Swarbrick.

I have tried in many ways to prove to the doubters of my theory on how light travels through space, and that we cannot go back in time when we study distant galaxies or dying stars we observe in the night sky either by unaided sight or by telescopes like Hubble or telescopes operated by electromagnetic radiation.

Some of us seem to underestimate the power of our own eyes, and do not realise that it only takes a millisecond for our eyes to focus on what is in front of them, and that we can see as far as the stars without help from telescopes or binoculars.

When we use aids like these mentioned they magnify the object we are homing in on, except for the ones that use radio waves, which bounce signals off of the object they focus on.

When Hubble was pointed at black open spaces out in the universe visions appeared, which according to my theory was Hubble reaching out to these lights, or in other words “magnifying” these lights, not so much the light reaching Hubble.
The light Hubble reaches out to are varied with constellations forming, and stars dying, and against all other theorist I believe that instead of going back in time when looking out as far as these visions we are still looking at what is out there now.
What happened out there after the Big Bang is history, and history cannot be retrieved through the more abundant lights we are observing, as we reach farther and farther out into space with our newer inventions.

I have pointed out these theories before, I hear you say, but think on when reading the next part.

Mass cannot travel at the speed of light, the light is produced by heat coming from different forms of mass,(forming galaxies, constellations or dying stars e.g.) and it is only the light that travels through space acting as all light does by spreading and weakening as it journeys out from its source.

Most of this light will carry heat and energy with it on part of its journey, which might be part of the makeup of dark matter as the light fades, leaving behind its energy, but that is another story.

If, as scientist believe, that the light we can see light years away is ONLY light reaching us from some occurrence that happened just after the Big Bang, and that by reaching it we can go back in time, then how can we bounce radar signals off of it?

They are contradicting themselves by saying that the image they are seeing will have taken a different shape or form over the millions of years the light has taken to reach us, and that the images Hubble is sending back is only light coming from an event that happened, not that it is happening now, then tell us they are bouncing radar signals off of objects within these images.

You cannot bounce radar signals off of light, you need “mass” or the source of the light to be there to get a signal that way, which tells me at least, that what they are looking at is happening NOW not light years ago.

Laser light (light amplification by stimulated emissions of radiation.) is used to measure the distance between the earth and the moon, but you need the source of the power that sends the laser ray out towards the moon to be active to achieve this.
If the power source was switched off before the ray reached the moon it would go no farther, disappear, and not carry on to bounce back and record a distance.
If you sent a laser beam out into open space, you can see the beam, but as soon as the source of the power projecting that light is switched off the beam disappears, you cannot follow its projection out into space.
Without its power source it does not exist, and the same principle applies to the light sources we are observing the deeper we reach into space.

I came across an example of how they contradict themselves in this way which I have copied below.

RADIO SIGNAL SENSITIVITY

The upgrade features a new system for focusing radio signals using a system of Gregorian reflectors, a new, more powerful 1 million watt radar transmitter and a 50ft high steel mesh ground screen to reduce ground interference. The facility, operated by Cornell University’s National Astronomy and Ionosphere Centre (NAIC) under co-operative agreement with the NSF, was upgraded with funds from the NSF and NASA at a cost of approximately $27 million.

The upgrade, the second since the facility was built in 1963, allows scientists to do in one hour what previously took 10 hours. The sensitivity was improved by a factor of about 20 for studies of the solar system and by a factor of about three or four for studies of distant galaxies. More radio frequencies are now available with increased sensitivity at all frequencies. Astronomers will be able to ‘observe’ signals farther away, and thus further back in time, than ever before. The telescope’s frequency range, and thus its sensitivity, previously 50MHz to 3,000MHz, is now 10,000MHz.
REFLECTOR DISH AND ANTENNA

Unchanged in the upgrade is Arecibo’s trademark reflector dish. Most radio telescopes use a parabolic antenna that can be steered to any direction. The Arecibo antenna is spherical and remains fixed but the focusing device suspended above the dish can be steered. Thus, signals can be captured from a greater slice of the sky. A radio/radar telescope captures and transmits radiation at radio wavelengths, unlike optical telescopes, which capture light waves. So clouds, haze and even daylight do not interfere with radio astronomy.

The system suspended above the dish to focus the radio waves collected by the 1,000ft diameter (305m) reflector has been radically changed. Now, a new six-storey, 90t dome houses a new reflector system, a combination of two radio mirrors and sensitive receiver systems. It is suspended 450ft above the giant reflector dish. The mirrors focus radio waves coming from distant objects in space or radar signals that are sent out into space and bounce back from the surfaces of the planets and other bodies in the solar system.

Read that and tell me how you can bounce radio waves off of light projecting from something that is supposed to have died light years ago, or fix radio waves on light reaching us now from a constellation that formed light years ago.
The source of the light HAS to be there still or the radio signal would carry on past it if it hadn’t enough “mass” to stop it.

It does pass through the light projected by the source until it reaches the “mass” then it bounces back to the receiver, the light from the source becoming stronger and narrowing nearest the source, acting as all light does, stronger at the source and spreading and weakening as it travels outward.

I am not debating that light travels, nor am I debating the speed of light, only that what we are observing out there is happening NOW not light years ago.
Not only is the light traveling to us, but we are reaching out to that “light source” nullifying any time lapse, and nullifying the notion that we can go back in time.

By Donald Swarbrick.

Gravity is one of the biggest problems we have when trying to understand the way the universe works, because we still are trying to figure out how it works, and the importance of its function.
We know it is essential to the way the universe is held together, but if we cannot understand it, then we cannot progress with our understanding of the universe as a whole, and some theories will remain theories.

It is my conjecture that gravity was needed to create the Big Bang, as I explained in earlier chapters of “unfeatheredangels” by gasses contorting as they met, which eventually resulted in the first spinning effect as they reacted with each other.
This in turn created a giant vortex, the suction to draw everything from the atmosphere within billions of light years in circumference into its center, which would include the ingredients that made up the universe.

All the ingredients were around, they only needed the reaction to bring them together, and this massive vortex was the answer.
Everything was mixed up and spat out by the chemical reaction created inside the vortex, by all the ingredients interacting to create the Big Bang, which sent solids, liquids, and gasses, spinning out into the space we are still careering through.

We are still being carried by the blast, that is why the planets are moving further apart, and the galaxies still stretching out through space.

Gravity was started by the spinning motion, and it is simply the orbs that make up the galaxies that are punching their way through space, while spinning and clearing air from their path, both on their outward journey away from the blast, plus the air they are clearing during their rotation on their axes, creating a vortex around them. The suction is in the lower layer, and the surge in the upper layer of the draft, which creates GRAVITY as we know it.

It is more the air or the atmosphere they are clearing during their rotation on their axes, that causes gravity as we know it, pulling objects down towards them that are a certain distance away from them,or inside the bubble created by the rotation, while bouncing others back off into space if they hit the bubble.

Draft is gravity, just like the draft you get when you slam a door, but the displacement of air is the cause of the gravity around the planets of the universe, because they are spinning.

If you are standing on one side of the door the displacement will push you, but if you are standing on the other side you will feel suction or drag, but because the door is only opening and shutting, and not spinning, you won’t create gravity.

A sphere on the other hand creates both suction, and the surge of air ahead of it, and as it is spinning the suction, and surge combine to create gravity. The pull downwards, and the bounce outwards, is the suction, and the surge reacting with the spinning motion as they fight with each other.
If it was a rectangle shape, or a square, the punching motion would always be at the front of the object heading through space, and the suction always at the rear, but with the spherical shape none of them has the upper hand, but both are present.
Its simple aerodynamics, if you were at the front of the rectangle, under the air rushing past you would be forced down onto the surface, but if you were at the back you would be brushed off by the air disturbance rushing past taking you away from the object, like a comet shedding particals constantly, as it moves through space.

Gravity can have an effect further away from the sphere than we have calculated, because it could be displacing the atmosphere miles further out from the gravitational pull we know of, and that is what holds smaller planets and Moons in their grasp.

Our Sun’s gravitational pull holds all the planets that we have discovered in our solar system and keeps them together to make up the solar system we know of, and the same thing is happening in other parts of the universe, making up galaxies, which in turn affects all other objects hurtling out in the blast created by the Big Bang.

Therefore the gravity created by the spinning motion of all the objects in the universe, reaches out further away from the objects than we first thought and creates the bases that holds the universe together in the form we know, plus the fact that all these objects are still hurtling away from the original blast.

When our spaceships force there way through earth’s gravitational pull, they enter into what appears to us as space and weightlessness, but the thin atmosphere they enter into could also be moving around along with the pull of the Sun, and although it has not been measured or noticed by us, this movement could still have a significant effect on the rest of the objects spinning around in the universe.

The newly discovered ring around Saturn is evidence that this is probable, as the dust particles making up the ring are eight million miles away from the planet.
Therefore the gravitational pull of Saturn has at least a radius of eight million miles, probably more.

Also every other object that spins around in the universe could have an effect on every other piece of Big Bang debris, if the atmosphere that surrounds each object blasting away from the original explosion, carries its thin atmosphere around with it.
There are particals in the space between planets,and stars,it is not a vacuum, or heat would not travel through it.

This unmeasured action of movement of thinning atmospheres that surrounds all the spheres could be the reason the universe does not collapse or collide, during its ever outward journey away from the core of the blast, as it acts like a cushion holding everything in its place, or in other words, holding the universe together.
The very answer to the question mentioned at the beginning of this post, the question that we need to answer before we can progress.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Horizon: Who’s Afraid of a Big Black Hole? and Gordon Ramsay’s F Word | TV review (guardian.co.uk)
• FORUM: How Do We Track Galaxy Motions? (space.com)

By Donald Swarbrick.

We measure time according to our solar system but, why do we think that our time is the only time measurement in the universe, and why do we assume,every stage of events taking place out there is measured by our time?
It is by us here on earth, but not necessarily by everyone in the universe.

We know there are enormous planets in deep space within our vision, and when we can reach even further we will discover solar systems in a very much bigger scale than ours.

If,life does exist on one of these massive planets,(which it will, of that I have no doubt) their time scale will be very different to ours, as it will be measured according to their solar system which, if so very much larger, will reflect a very much slower pace of time, therefore, their measurements of time and distance to other planets, and galaxies, even their lifespan itself, will be calculated in a completely different manner.

Our solar system, in comparison to one like that, will seem to them, like theirs in a fast forward motion, and our lifespan merely a blip in time, which of course it is, but we have never stopped to think just how insignificant our solar system is, and always assume that we are the superior race in the universe.

Mankind as we know it has many weaknesses, one of them being his lifespan, cut short by sickness, wars, or other disasters that can befall earth, or simply old age which in most cases lasts less than one hundred earth years. A blip in universal time.
We are barely here in this form, before we are gone again, leaving our ideas, or discoveries for future generations to elaborate on, which limits the progress we make.

Another life form evolving in a solar system so much larger than ours, that works in a completely different way to ours, will have evolved much stronger than us, with less weaknesses to shorten their lifespan.
The very fact that their time measurement is so much longer than ours will make their lifespan longer, if not eternal, as their solar system having evolved billions of years before ours would have given them time to perfect life, also given the fact that their ideas and discoveries will not have been hampered by death.

Another reason to believe such a planet as this would have a different time scale is, that if it used our time scale, one side of the planet would be earth years behind the other, or earth years ahead, just as we in Britain are hours behind Australia, or ahead of America, so in theirs, they will have calculated time to suit their solar system, long before time was needed on earth.

Now that puts the measurement of time and distance into a different prospective, which would make the universe a much smaller place for them and would enable them to travel through space without having to worry about distance.

If you look at the universe  through their eyes, the galaxies they, or we can see are not billions of light years away, but only a short journey away in the exceptional conveyances they will have perfected on that planet, therefore they will have reached these stars. They will be able to confirm my theories in my last post that what you are seeing out there is happening now, and not some light reflection from an event that happened light years ago.
It stands to reason that the light source HAS to be there if we can still see it in a structural form, solid or gas, otherwise it would  just be light energy we would see, and we would have nothing to travel to in the case of dying stars.

Scientist contradict themselves by looking out at other solar systems light years away, and recognize a planet orbiting around a star, and when telling us about it lead us to believe what they have witnessed is occurring out there now, but then they try to tell us that the forming galaxies or the light from the dying star they see, happened billions of light years ago, and the event is only reaching us now.
What is the point of looking out into the universe for other life forms if you think the light reflection you are looking at happened many light years ago, because according to their theories, how would we know if the promising planet that could hold life still exists, or if it died, and the light reflection of its death throes have not reached us yet?

If we want to unfold the mysteries of space, we have to take into consideration, that we are only a speck of dust in the universe in comparison to the enormous planets with life on them, and our life span is only a fraction of time in comparison to theirs.
We have to admit our inferiority in the universe, accept that other life forms that may look the same as us, can reach us, and have reached us.
That is what the bible is all about, people from another solar system being on earth.
You do not have to believe the bible but you do have to admit that if such a planet exists, everything I said is possible, and given everything I have said, you have to admit that more than likely such a planet does exist.
Out there in the universe, the measurement of time, and distance IS completely different, and will bring a whole new definition to our observations, and calculations that we have surmised from our lowly position in space.

Related articles by Zemanta

• A Galaxy-Sized Observatory For Gravitational Waves (science.slashdot.org)
• Meteorite Dust Hints at Solar System’s Origins (space.com)

By Donald Swarbrick.

Have you ever stopped to wonder why, at the time of the Egyptians, a people with great knowledge of the stars, erecting buildings of such complicated design, were so much more advanced than the inhabitants of the colder regions on earth?

Take a look at South America around the same era, and the Zapotecs, Mayans, Incas etc, the nations who appeared suddenly, who were also very knowledgable of the stars, and built buildings of similar structures to the Egyptians, but never knew of them, (that we know of anyway.)

God who created this world, would have travelled to other parts of the universe before he reached our little corner, therefore would have discovered other planets with life on them, some in need of rescue, their planet being in danger from its sun, or a more internal problem like volcanic eruptions, so is it not possible that nations from another galaxy were transported to earth?

If you believe in God, and his creation of our little part of the universe, then why should you doubt his capabilities of being able to achieve rescue missions in other parts of  the universe?

To be able to reach here, never mind interfering with our solar system, is a great acheivement on its own, and to have accomplished both, means he is capable of almost anything.

The Egyptians, and the nations who settled in South America, when brought here would have been placed in the warmer regions of earth in an attempt to educate the primitive natives of earth who lived a completely different lifestyle to these new nations, having evolved much later in the lifespan of the universe.

God himself, chose the warmer regions to spend his time here, which makes a lot of sense, as why would he want to educate people so primitive in such an inhospitable climate, making life uncomfortable for himself, and the staff he brought with him from his own planet?

The Egyptians flourished in the region they were allocated, with God, and his staff there to assist them over thousands of years, while on the other side of the world, STILL in a warm climate the South American nations were flourishing too, with God’s staff checking up on them every now and then.

The knowledge of the stars, that these nations accumulated would have been gained on their journey through space from their own planet to earth, by the people who brought them here, namely God’s people.

These nations were so far advanced in comparison to other people on earth, that there is no way they could have evolved here at the same time, or the knowledge they had, would have been spread more evenly around the globe, even in those early days.

The further the ice and snow receded the more this education spread, as the people travelled out into the new lands being uncovered, but still were never as advanced as the Egyptians, or the South American nations.

Why was this knowledge confined to these nations, and why was it not allowed to continue?

We wonder if we are alone in the universe, and are trying to discover if there is “life out there,” but we have been told in the bible of people who did great things here on earth, of angels, and miracles. Where did these people come from if not out there in space?  It seems as plain as the nose on your face that they did not come from here, or think of the advancements that would have been made by now.  ” NO WE ARE NOT ALONE IN THE UNIVERSE.”

If this is true, you ask, why did these people leave us to discover the secrets of space for ourselves, and not educate us in the way they taught the Egyptians, Mayans, Zapotecs Incas etc?

The answer is simple.

What happened to the South American nations? They were slaughtered by the invading Spanish.

What happened to the Egyptians? They were invaded, conquered and slaughtered by the invading Romans.

What is happening around the globe still? Wars and violence waged against our own kind, day in and day out.

What kind of message does that send to life forms far in advance of us out there in space?

If these people were placed here to assist in the evolution of earth and were slaughtered by the very people they were put here to help, would that not deter any peaceful nations from making their presence know on earth?

Once we evolve enough, or to put it bluntly (GROW UP) and  learn to live in peace among ourselves, then maybe we will be allowed to find out for sure, that we are not alone in the universe.

Until then we will be observed, and stay segregated from the peaceful nations out there who could so easily enlighten us, and unfold the secrets of the universe we so desperatly seek , so, taking all that into consideration, who can blame them for letting us go on wondering “IF WE ARE ALONE.”

Related articles by Zemanta

• Is There Gravity in Space? (space.com)
• Solar Sysem (slideshare.net)
• Titan: A World Much Like Earth (space.com)
• Hubble reawakens, snaps image of Jupiter scar (cnn.com)

Most of the frontiers on earth have been reached but even though we know where the extremes are, there are  places and secrets on our planet that still have to be discovered and unfolded to us.

We fool ourselves into believing that with a few calculations we can fathom out where the extremes of space are, but if we are going to be honest with ourselves, that task from this insignificant corner of the universe is impossible at this moment in time as we still surmise most facts about space and everything outwith hubbles vision, and until we can travel further into space or someone from distant space shows theirself  here and enlightens us about what is out there, we will have to keep on guessing.

We are still learning about earth, and we are still evolving as a whole in this part of the universe and given our size in comparison to some of the  planets we HAVE discovered, to consider US as a power in the vastness of space is typical of the arrogance you find among earth people.

Our life span or body clock is governed not only by the conditions on earth that the environmentalists  drum into us, (and quite rightly) but also by the size of the planet and its orbit around the sun.

All these things, and more, have to be taken into consideration when we look out into space and think about traveling towards the far reaches of the universe, to prove one way or another, if we are alone or not, in the vastness that we call outer space.

When you take into account the small amount of years we have in us between the ages when we are mature enough and fit enough for our bodies to survive even a short journey through space, to when we are too old for such journeys, just think of the consequences if we were to man some of the probes we have already sent out. There is no way we, in our time span could survive such a experience.

Although man has been to the moon (some even question that) and walks in space around the space station, or hubble, that is as much as he can achieve now, and given our capabilities and resources, that is about as far as he will go.

If our planet was much larger than it is or more to the point if we came from a planet many, many more times bigger than earth, our bodies would be compatible to that planet with its rotations and orbit around its sun, or whatever circumstances are involved within its solar system,  which could create the means to allow us to travel through space to the destination of our choice, just like the planet where God came from.

As I said in my last post, time, as we know it, did not exist when the world was being created, as time was not needed in this corner of the universe, and the time that we use now is defined by the solar system we are in, and has been calculated by mankind for mankinds own benefit.  The same thing would have happened on the planet Heaven where God originated, but their time and lifespan or body clock will be defined by their planet which given its size will have inclined their bodies the resilience to go as far into space as they wish, plus the fact that they have evolved fully allowing them to discover the secret of everlasting life and develop a technology that enables them to build the machines capable of reaching the extremities of the universe, and THEIR time will be determined by their planets actions, which will be measured in a much bigger time-span than ours.

My theories do not come from calculations guessed at from our part of the universe, but from a book where we can find recorded, (albeit vaguely) events that mention flying machines and medical phenomenons carried out on earth thousands of (earth) years ago by people who did not originate from here and with a knowledge that must have originated on another planet far in advance of earth.

The bible is of course that book, but I am not deciphering it from a religious point of view, but from a twenty first century point of view that has sorely been neglected and stifled by people who are afraid to explore any further the real meaning in it, because of the fear and brainwashing that has been installed in them down through the years of a terrible fate that might befall them if they dare think of the bible as anything else but sacred.

We used to think that the earth was the center of the universe, then as our knowledge progressed we discovered that it was earth that was revolving around the sun, then came to the conclusion that the sun was the center of the universe until we progressed even further and realised that there was so much more out there to discover, and the center was elsewhere.

There has to be a center to the universe, and that has to be where the “BIG BANG” took place which brings me to the conclusions that I have arrived at. Even the earliest of  astronomers realised that there had to be a center to the universe although it took them a while to realise that it was not in our solar system, but we don’t seem to have come much further, because we still do not know where the center is.

As the universe is still expanding by blasting and spreading out, there must have been a force to project it, therefore we are spreading from the center which would have been where  the “BIG BANG” took place.  Now that makes sense to me as any projectile I have ever seen was blasted by a force of some sort or other, and what  force other than the “BIG BANG” could project enough force as to propel all the contents of the universe in an outward manner.

So when the first planets evolved at the center, after the main blast spread out, and the first people evolved on that planet, THAT is when time first began as people are the only things in the universe that needed to measure time.

Time on earth was not need until mankind progressed enough to take note of his surroundings and become aware of the results of time passing, like ageing and understanding night and day etc.

We have been promised everlasting life, according to the messages in the bible, so I would imagine that the superior medical knowledge of the people brought here by God from his planet will know how to adjust our earthly bodies to the conditions on there and will give us the same treatment that provides them with eternal life.

That is the only way the mystery of where the center of the universe is, will be unfolded to us, NOT by our own inventions but by people who have been here before and promised that they would be back to take us to their planet, in their ships, where we will have eternal life.

No matter how much we strive for deeper exploration into space, we simply don’t have the resources on earth to reach these pinnacles, so we will have to rely on God keeping his promise.  Then our time will have arrived to have the secrets of the universe unfolded to us.

It was respect and recognition that God was looking for, rather being made a source of terror by the churches, due to their interpretation of the record he left, so we should not be afraid to interpret the bible from a twentieth century point of view, and forget the terror tactics that has restricted our imaginations, keeping us from approaching astral problems from a new angle.

When you look at it from that point of view it makes more sense, because suddenly here we have a logical answer to the problems that have puzzled mankind throughout the ages, and if you begin to make your calculations from these theories you may find it easier to solve the equation in front of you.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Long Shot: Planet Could Hit Earth in Distant Future (space.com)
• Solar System’s Future Could Be Bumpy (usnews.com)