Posts Tagged ‘Think’

What do u think of my feature article?

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012

Question by sOuL dOcToR: What do u think of my feature article?
(Please please please do not rewrite this, because I’m just wanting to know what you think of it)

The Great Heroes of the Bible Versus the Modern Heroes of Today

Different ages, cultures, and beliefs vary the heroic personality. To the historian, a hero is one who shapes the course of events; to the philosopher, one who alters the thinking of his times; to the folklorist, one who evokes legends and songs. The search for true heroism is inherent in human nature. This article will discuss the definition of true heroism, how biblical heroes compare with modern-day heroes, and how biblical heroes are more successful, valued, and appreciated.

A true hero is a godly role model who exhibits great courage and perseverance. His motives are pure, self-sacrificial, and ordained for the benefit of others. He is not afraid to stand up for what is right, even though it may cost him his life. Above all, his goals are righteous and inspired by God, and therefore he achieves them successfully.
I believe that many modern-day heroes are inferior to biblical heroes, because they are fictitious, unrealistic characters who never change their ideals or plans. They are flat fantasy figures seen on cartoon movies like Spiderman and Superman. They rely on their superficial strength and magical powers to fascinate others. This shows a contrast from the great heroes of the Bible who recognised their imperfections and fallible wills, changed, and then succeeded, rising to the status of true heroes of faith. At first, the apostle Peter relied on his own strength and denied his Lord, but when he realised his mistake, he repented, and his life was changed. We see later that he converts three thousand unbelievers to Christ and performs many miracles through the power of God. In the same way, Paul persecuted the Christians because he trusted in his own knowledge. When he recognized his grave error, he changed. God transformed him and empowered him to witness for Christ.
These are the true heroes that we are to value, because they realised their humanistic weaknesses, repented, and were then raised to greatness, not in their own strength, but in the power of the Holy Spirit working in their lives.
I believe that some modern-day heroes are unsuccessful, because their goals are inspired by their own fleshly and selfish desires. They rely on the materialistic appurtenances of this world: physique, beauty, wealth, and popularity. Elvis Presley was the king of rock music and a very renowned performer. Although he achieved his goal of being a millionaire with great fame, did this really achieve him true success? Did he really attain the fulfilment of happiness, good health, long life, peace of mind, and Eternal Life? Records show that Presley suffered from diseases and mental depression, he abused himself with drugs, and he finally died a miserable death at a young age. If only he had pursued more valuable goals, his life would not have been such a failure.
Hamlet and Macbeth are famous Shakespearean heroes to the public audience. They achieved their goals, but because their goals were evil, they did not succeed in the end. Hamlet was vengeful and unforgiving. His desire to usurp the throne turned him into a heartless murderer, rather than a hero to be admired. In the same way, Macbeth slaughtered his king for the sake of his selfish desire to gain excessive power and wealth. He successfully achieved his goal, but he did not realise the consequences that would follow. His kingdom was in uproar; he had bizarre dreams; his conscience was beleaguered with guilt. In the end, Macbeth was massacred. Hamlet and Macbeth are not true heroes, because their goals were ungodly and did not achieve true success.
In contrast, biblical heroes are more successful, because their goals are virtuous and inspired by an infallible God. Despite his size, David had a goal to save Israel from the Philistine enemy. David trusted in God, and because his goal was righteous, God empowered him to defeat the giant. King Solomon devoted his life to God, and his goal was to acquire wisdom to lead his people uprightly. God not only gave Solomon wisdom, but also showered him with riches, honour, and fame. Solomon found true happiness and satisfaction in life. Without a doubt, we can conclude that David and Solomon were truly successful heroes, because they pursued godly goals. As the Bible affirms in Proverbs 21:21, “He who pursues righteousness finds life, prosperity, and honour.”
For these reasons, I strongly believe that biblical heroes are more successful compared to modern-day heroes. We cannot rely on fictitious characters to stimulate our imagination. Many modern-day heroes rely on their own abilities to achieve their goals, and many of their goals are based on selfish motives and worldly pleasures. Biblical heroes are not sanitized, plastic icons carved into theoretical creatures, but are rather flesh-and-blood people who achieved great feats for God, despite their imperfections. Biblical heroes are wholly inspiring and are worth imitating, because their righteous goals reflect their inner personalities: love, fortitude, devotion, and self-sacrifice. A call for godly role models is becoming more critical in our depraved society, and as we have seen in this article, the Bible is our ultimate source to find them. We should admire the true success revealed in the lives of biblical heroes.

Best answer:

Answer by terrayle
I like the first part very much, up until the first bit that you added in details. I feel that you started to write in another style altogether at that point, it became less of a study and more personal feelings I think. But it is still very good.
Please read my essay question and help me out as well! thanks!

What do you think? Answer below!

More Modern Philosophers Articles

Why do some Christians think atheism is a religion or philosophy?

Saturday, December 3rd, 2011

Question by Bob Nias: Why do some Christians think atheism is a religion or philosophy?
There is some philosophy surrounding atheism, but its arguing for atheism. Atheists live their live and believe whatever philosophy they want!
And believing in a philosophy is not a religion; religion involves believing in a god(or gods) that watch over us.
Atheism is just not believing in any gods, that doesn’t make it a religion. I don’t believe in the tooth fairy, does that count as a religion? No.

Best answer:

Answer by anonymous1_anonymous5
their isolated upbringings account for this.

Add your own answer in the comments!

can someone help me think of a good name for a?

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

Question by redbone001: can someone help me think of a good name for a?
traditional and modern philosopher party, its kind of like democratic and republican but we are dealing with philosphy, i need an idea for mascots to if you dont mind. Thanks for the help,

Best answer:

Answer by Brian M
The Platonians, The Predeterminites, The Freewillians, and the Metaphysicians.

EDIT: you could have the predeterminites and the freewillians battle. The freewillians get to pick the question (free will) and the predeterminites have to answer the question the freewillians ask (no free will)

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Related Modern Philosophers Articles

Do you think philosophy conflicts with or supports your theology?

Saturday, November 12th, 2011

Question by Crystalize: Do you think philosophy conflicts with or supports your theology?
For anyone who has studied or even read up on Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras up to modern philosophers, do you feel their ideas clash with your religion or do you think the concepts are compatable?

For the non-religious: would you say ideas about ethics and morals can be adequately obtained from philosphy rather than religious doctrine?

.

Best answer:

Answer by mighty.macabros
Since my religion is heavy on philosophy, to the point it is accepted as the standard for philosophic guidelines in a lot of Asian countries, I would say that it supports my Theology very much so.

Add your own answer in the comments!

www.egs.edu Manuel DeLanda speaking about materialism and experience, Gilles Deleuze, materialist philosophy, left and marxist movement, a world of experience, philosophy of nature, social constructivism, sociology, materialism, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, Martin Heidegger and Jacques Derrida. Free public open video lecture for the students and faculty of the European Graduate School EGS, Film Media and Communication Studies department program, Saas-Fee, Switzerland, Europe, 2008. Manuel De Landa. Manuel DeLanda, (born 1952 in Mexico City), is a writer, artist and distinguished philosopher who has lived in New York since 1975. He is an Adjunct Associate Professor at Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation at Columbia University (New York), a Professor for Contemporary Philosophy and Science at the European Graduate School in Saas-Fee, Switzerland, a professor at the Canisius College in Buffalo, New York, and professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Design in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He is the author of War in the Age of Intelligent Machines (1991), A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History (1997), Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy (2002) and A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (2006). He has published many articles and essays and lectured extensively in Europe and in the United States. His work focuses on the theories of the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze on one hand, and modern science, self
Video Rating: 4 / 5

More Modern Philosophers Articles

what do modern day jewish philosopher’s think of spinoza?

Monday, October 10th, 2011

Question by Michael: what do modern day jewish philosopher’s think of spinoza?

Best answer:

Answer by Christine
I doubt there’s a consensus. Here’s my view. He left Judaism to become a Catholic, hence his change of name from Baruch Spinoza to Benedict Spinoza. His philosophy was pantheistic, except for his becoming a Catholic.

Add your own answer in the comments!

More Modern Philosophers Articles

Do you think stem cell research is the modern Philosopher’s stone.?

Saturday, September 10th, 2011

Question by Red Yeti: Do you think stem cell research is the modern Philosopher’s stone.?

Best answer:

Answer by Briseis of Troy
Embryonic stem cell research is becomming obsolete because
of the discovery of adult stem cells, not only are they superior
but they also dont cause many of the horrid side effects of using
unnatural embryonics in and adult body of all th ings

Give your answer to this question below!

More Modern Philosophers Articles

Do you think that Paris Hilton is a “modern” philosopher?

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

Question by john889743: Do you think that Paris Hilton is a “modern” philosopher?
Is she the Plato or the Socrate of the years 2000. Yes? No? Justify your answers.

Best answer:

Answer by .
no.lol

What do you think? Answer below!

Do you think Aristarchus of Samos and other ancient scientists ideas contributed to more modern scientists vie

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011

Question by milthistagent: Do you think Aristarchus of Samos and other ancient scientists ideas contributed to more modern scientists vie
Do you think ancient scientists, mathematicians, philosophers ideas contributed to more modern scientists like Newton, Einstein, Copernicus?

For example: Aristarchus of Samos proposed the first heliocentric model of the Universe. Did Copernicus use that as part of his research? (It was also proposed by Seleucus and Vedic texts)

Best answer:

Answer by xx_villainess_xx
Definitely. Ancient scientists, mathematicians, philosophers, etc. laid the foundations for those of today. Aristarchus of Samos is a perfect example. He was the first known astronomer to propose the heliocentric model of the solar system (the sun being the center of the solar system) at a time when the geocentric model (the earth being the center of the solar system) was more widely accepted. Plato, his student, Aristotle, Ptolemy, and many others supported the geocentric model. Seleucus was the last known astronomer to have supported the heliocentric model proposed by Aristarchus–and like you said, it was also found much earlier in Vedic texts–until Copernicus came along.

I remember reading somewhere that it was said that Copernicus had cited Aristarchus’ theory in one of his manuscripts, but the citation was never released for publication because he was not directly inspired by Aristarchus, contrary to popular belief. And that the Copernican theory stemmed not from an astronomer’s standpoint, rather a “simple” mathematician’s hypothesis.

Whatever the case might be, these are people that laid the foundation for their successors (Galileo, etc.). Their theories were scrutinized and revised for centuries…and what we NOW know is the result.

Here are some others that are worthy of note:

Leucippus and his student Democritus, and their atomic theory

Pythagoras and his Pythagorean theorem (a^2 + b^2= c^2). The theorem itself is believed to predate Pythagoras’ existence, but he was credited with discovering it and proving it to be true.

Alcmaeon of Croton, an ancient Greek philosopher who “dabbled” in medicine (there is no conclusive evidence that he was a physician, though most of his work dealt with medical science). He performed human dissection for medical research; supported the idea that the brain was the “powerhouse” of the body, the source of our intelligence and consciousness; and made a connection between the brain, nerves and sensory organs.

Hippocrates, the father of medicine. He was the first to rationalize diseases and illnesses; considered that diseases and illnesses could potentially be attributed to one’s environment and/or family history; and of course I have to mention his contribution of the Hippocratic Oath.

Archimedes, the greatest mathematician in history, and his Archimedes’ Principle (buoyancy).

Eratosthenes, who was said to be the first to have calculated the circumference of the Earth (and it wasn’t too far off), and also devised the longitude and latitude system.

These are just a few that I can think of at the moment (I could probably list a ton more), without taking the time to pull out notes or do some research. Unfortunately I could only think of those of Greek origin, but there are many others from other regions worthy of note as well.

What do you think? Answer below!

Boomeritis: a video montage of this post-modernism “disease”, narrated by What Is Enlightenment? magazine’s Tom Huston, from a retreat with Andrew Cohen Boomeritis, a term coined by philosopher Ken Wilber, describes a curious condition afflicting the baby boom generation. In short, “high cognitive pluralism mixed with low emotional narcissism.” AKA: a smart, progressive person with a big ego. :-) It’s a disease that began infecting human beings during the sixties revolution, when millions of rebellious American and European teens, took full advantage of the rights and freedoms afforded them by Western society and explored the entire spectrum of their egoic autonomy. Busting through every limitation, subverting every authority, and ingesting every psychedelic drug they could get their hands on, they each tumbled out, squinting and dazed, into the bright sunny dawn of the Age of Aquarius. And although that new age, obscured by the rose-colored glasses of hippiedom, wasn’t all it was cracked up to be, it did mark the birth of an actual new stage of human consciousness and culture. Historians, sociologists, and philosophers call it postmodernity, and its defining characteristic was the capacity to allow a variety of differing viewpoints, cultures, and worldviews to peacefully coexist in an egalitarian embrace. Today this multicultural consciousness is also frequently called “pluralism” for its ability to honor and respect a multidimensional plurality of perspectives, and is
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Do you think that Lady Gaga is a “modern” philosopher?

Monday, August 29th, 2011

Question by john889743: Do you think that Lady Gaga is a “modern” philosopher?
Yes, no, explain why.

Best answer:

Answer by Nick C 420
shes a zit from the earths ass

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Do you think that Eminem is the greatest “modern” philosopher?

Monday, August 15th, 2011

Question by john889743: Do you think that Eminem is the greatest “modern” philosopher?
Is Eminem the Socrate or the Plato or the years 2000? Yes ? No? Explain your answer.

Best answer:

Answer by burgeous
Comparing Eminem, a contemporary rapper, to Socrates or Plato is a grave insult. He offers trivial sentiments and cliché words that rival that of motivational calenders. I think I just lost all faith in the human race.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

“Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have had a profound impact on almost every philosophical movement that followed him.” In epistemology, a priori propositions can be known independent of (prior to) experience, whereas a posteriori propositions can be known only on the basis of experience (after experience). Thus, the distinction between a priori and a posteriori corresponds roughly to the distinction between nonempirical and empirical knowledge. The a priori / a posteriori distinction is applied to ways of knowing, propositions, arguments, and concepts. Because of its dependence upon verification by experience, the foundation for classifying a proposition as a posteriori is more easily grasped. An a priori concept can be acquired independently of experience, which may include, but is not necessarily confined to innate concepts. In logic, a proposition is a statement, couched as a declarative sentence, that affirms or denies the predicate, and that is either true or false. An analytic proposition can variously be described as a proposition whose predicate concept is contained within its subject concept, a proposition that is true by definition, whose truth depends solely on the meaning of its terms, or a proposition that is made true solely by the conventions of language. Analytic propositions, because truth is built in by virtue
Video Rating: 4 / 5