Question by john889743: Do you think that Eminem is the greatest “modern” philosopher?
Is Eminem the Socrate or the Plato or the years 2000? Yes ? No? Explain your answer.
Best answer:
Answer by burgeous Comparing Eminem, a contemporary rapper, to Socrates or Plato is a grave insult. He offers trivial sentiments and cliché words that rival that of motivational calenders. I think I just lost all faith in the human race.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
“Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have had a profound impact on almost every philosophical movement that followed him.” In epistemology, a priori propositions can be known independent of (prior to) experience, whereas a posteriori propositions can be known only on the basis of experience (after experience). Thus, the distinction between a priori and a posteriori corresponds roughly to the distinction between nonempirical and empirical knowledge. The a priori / a posteriori distinction is applied to ways of knowing, propositions, arguments, and concepts. Because of its dependence upon verification by experience, the foundation for classifying a proposition as a posteriori is more easily grasped. An a priori concept can be acquired independently of experience, which may include, but is not necessarily confined to innate concepts. In logic, a proposition is a statement, couched as a declarative sentence, that affirms or denies the predicate, and that is either true or false. An analytic proposition can variously be described as a proposition whose predicate concept is contained within its subject concept, a proposition that is true by definition, whose truth depends solely on the meaning of its terms, or a proposition that is made true solely by the conventions of language. Analytic propositions, because truth is built in by virtue … Video Rating: 4 / 5
Question by RubiaBonita: How do you think ordinary people of pre-modern generations determined what was true/accurate?
This is for soc…how do you think ordinary people of pre modern generations (before the European Enlightenment) determined what was true/accurate/correct about their world and what was not?
Also, today how do you think the following people develop knowledge of “what is”: religious believers, philosophers, natural scientists and sociologists?
How did they determine what was true about their world- and what was not true?
Best answer:
Answer by Mimi What a geat question. They probably just stuck with what the Church or the King said.
Question by icu812: I think I want to be a modern day philosopher. What do they do all day? How does one make money?
I don’t want to be a college professor but I am good at reading books and writing essays. I am a deep thinker and love history, religions and philosophy. Am I a good candidate?
Plus I have lots of opinions and don’t mind sharing them…lol.
Opinions are like bumholes… Everybody has one!!
Best answer:
Answer by kimandchris2 LOL
i’m with you..let me know if you find out how, eh?
Question by Meredith K: Do you think, if there are any modern philosophers, that they must lead tragic lives or lives of oppression?
Best answer:
Answer by pinkyismygirlfriendniluvhur it depends
philosophers are people who love knowledge I think
so if they just go get some, then I bet they are happy
some of em probly drink too much and sleep all day and don’t do their laundry enough though
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Another example of why mind-body dualism illustrates why I studied science and not philosophy. I sometimes think that some philosophers belong in caves, gazing at the flickering shadows of unfettered imagination on the wall. Joking aside, neurosurgeons and neurologists would be very unlikely to subscribe to the notion that the soul, mind, or consciousness exist independent of the processes of the physical mind. Evidence suggests that these are all experiential manifestations of brain activity. David John Chalmers is an Australian philosopher specializing in the area of philosophy of mind. In “The Conscious Mind” (1996), “Chalmers argues that all forms of physicalism (whether reductive or non-reductive) that have dominated modern philosophy and science fail to account for the existence (that is, presence in reality) of consciousness itself. He proposes an alternative dualistic view he calls naturalistic dualism (but which might also be characterized by more traditional formulations such as property dualism, neutral monism, or double-aspect theory).” en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org “If I understand the basic idea, naturalistic dualism holds that consciousness: – Is not a reducible phenomenon – Cannot be explained in terms of function – Is fundamentally different from anything physical or any function of anything physical, and is therefore a qualitatively different entity from anything else in the known universe source … Video Rating: 4 / 5
This course would not promote one religion over another, but discuss the many religions in our country and around the world so the students would have a better understanding of these religions.
It would be an elective course, not required for any student. What do you think?
Product Description ‘This translation provides the English reader with an introduction to Brunner’s thought, and as such, it is more than sufficient. Goetz outlines the architectonic framework of Brunner’s system, providing the reader with a simple structure within which to understand the more complex ideas presented’ – David Westbrook, York University…. More >>