Question by : What were the flaws in Parmenides’ theory of change?
I’m attempting to write a philosophy paper, criticizing Parmenides’ theory of change/being/reality (whatever). Can anyone point me to a source or name a book that gives info on what modern day philosopher think about Parmenides’ theory? Or what flaws Plato found in the theory? Do you have any opinions on Parmenides’ theory?

It would help very much. Thanks in advance to anyone who tries to help!

Best answer:

Answer by DrIG
Information is below.

What do you think? Answer below!

Every thing you wanted to know about the modern translation issue – www.youtube.com The New Case Against the NIV, NASB, NRSV, NAB, REB, RSV, CEV, TEV, GNB, LIVING, PHILLIPS, NEW JERUSALEM, & NEW CENTURY. The Message – The emerging ‘new’ Christianty—with its substitution of riches for righteous, a crown for a cross, and an imitation for a new creation—is shown to be a direct result of the wording in the new versions. Documented are the thousands of words, verses, and doctrines by which new versions will prepare the aspostate churches of these last days to accept the religion of the Antichrist–even his mark, image, and Lucifer worship. The Men – Each page opens a door exposing new version editors–in agreement with Luciferians, occultists, and New Age philosophy–in mental institutions, seance parlors, prison cells, and court rooms for heresy trials–and most shocking of all–denying that salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ. Five have lost their ability to speak. The Manuscripts – The Greek manuscripts, critical editions, lexicons and dictionaries behind the new versions are examined, revealing their occult origins, contents, and yet unreleased material–a blueprint for the Antichrist’s One World Religion and government. 2 1/2 hour video – video.google.com THE TEACHERS and their 74 AUDIO MESSAGES with filenames: www.wgcr.org More: www.warneveryone.com Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution – www.warneveryone.com Live broadcasting with instant …
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Question by OKwithme: Can philosophy, religion, and other fields satisfy our need to believe or is there a problem we’re not facing?
Humans are limited by their sensations, intellect, etc. We will never know certain core aspects of reality (Kant’s noumena, Spinoza’s infinite intellect, etc). But we need to believe we can.

Best answer:

Answer by Born-Down!
yes,
currently existing reasons and facts of reality can satisfy those who can understand. Those who search and inform themselves must also have capability of seeing the true gems; just like goldsmith knows true and counterfeit, knowledge seekers should train themselves to see the differences in what they read or acquiring information; they must become having conscience in the middle-age or not too late.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Speaking of teachers and professors, there were a few. One was a Jesuit, another was a guy I was sure was an Atheist while I took his class, though I later found out he was a Christian, another was an Existentialist who talked constantly of Sartre and French thought. Do these early experiences with intelligent men influence your current definition of intelligent?

I cannot figure out what Hegel’s views on epistemology , ethics, and metaphysics were. Anyone have any insight?

I need the names of a few Philosophers who have good works about Epistemology from the Late Modern Era (The time when names like Soren Kierkegaard were still around). Also, if you know any other names from other Eras, let me know as well, but I need a Philosopher from the Late Modern Era specifically for a paper I have due on Epistemology.