<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosophers Chair &#187; Donald&#8217;s Views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephilosopherschair.com/view/donalds-views/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com</link>
	<description>... Our views on philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Electromagnetic radiation our universal penetration.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/580-electromagnetic-radiation-our-universal-penetration</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/580-electromagnetic-radiation-our-universal-penetration#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arecibo Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG BANG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electromagnetic radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optical telescope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio frequency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Donald Swarbrick. I have tried in many ways to prove to the doubters of my theory on how light travels through space, and that we cannot go back in time when we study distant galaxies or dying stars we observe in the night sky either by unaided sight or by telescopes like Hubble or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Donald Swarbrick.</p>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/S65KjmRkD0I/AAAAAAAAAcU/jwCY8rVoC-c/s1600/radio_telescope.gif"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/S65KjmRkD0I/AAAAAAAAAcU/jwCY8rVoC-c/s400/radio_telescope.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
I have tried in many ways to prove to the doubters of my theory on how light travels through space, and that we cannot go back in time when we study distant galaxies or dying stars we observe in the night sky either by unaided sight or by telescopes like Hubble or telescopes operated by <a title="Electromagnetic radiation" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation">electromagnetic radiation</a>.</p>
<p>Some of us seem to underestimate the power of our own eyes, and do not realise that it only takes a millisecond for our eyes to focus on what is in front of them, and that we can see as far as the stars without help from telescopes or binoculars.</p>
<p>When we use aids like these mentioned they magnify the object we are homing in on, except for the ones that use radio waves, which bounce signals off of the object they focus on.</p>
<p>When Hubble was pointed at black open spaces out in the universe visions appeared, which according to my theory was Hubble reaching out to these <a title="Light" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light">lights</a>, or in other words &#8220;magnifying&#8221; these lights, not so much the light reaching Hubble.<br />
The light Hubble reaches out to are varied with constellations forming, and stars dying, and against all other theorist I believe that instead of going back in time when looking out as far as these visions we are still looking at what is out there now.<br />
What happened out there after the Big Bang is history, and history cannot be retrieved through the more abundant lights we are observing, as we reach farther and farther out into space with our newer inventions.</p>
<p>I have pointed out these theories before, I hear you say, but think on when reading the next part.</p>
<p>Mass cannot travel at the speed of light, the light is produced by heat coming from different forms of mass,(forming galaxies, constellations or dying stars e.g.) and it is only the light that travels through space acting as all light does by spreading and weakening as it journeys out from its source.</p>
<p>Most of this light will carry heat and energy with it on part of its journey, which might be part of the makeup of dark matter as the light fades, leaving behind its energy, but that is another story.</p>
<p>If, as scientist believe, that the light we can see light years away is ONLY light reaching us from some occurrence that happened just after the <a title="Big Bang" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang">Big Bang</a>, and that by reaching it we can go back in time, then how can we bounce radar signals off of it?</p>
<p>They are contradicting themselves by saying that the image they are seeing will have taken a different shape or form over the millions of years the light has taken to reach us, and that the images Hubble is sending back is only light coming from an event that happened, not that it is happening now, then tell us they are bouncing radar signals off of objects within these images.</p>
<p>You cannot bounce radar signals off of light, you need &#8220;mass&#8221; or the source of the light to be there to get a signal that way, which tells me at least, that what they are looking at is happening NOW not light years ago.</p>
<p>Laser light (light amplification by stimulated emissions of radiation.) is used to measure the distance between the earth and the moon, but you need the source of the power that sends the laser ray out towards the moon to be active to achieve this.<br />
If the power source was switched off before the ray reached the moon it would go no farther, disappear, and not carry on to bounce back and record a distance.<br />
If you sent a laser beam out into open space, you can see the beam, but as soon as the source of the power projecting that light is switched off the beam disappears, you cannot follow its projection out into space.<br />
Without its power source it does not exist, and the same principle applies to the light sources we are observing the deeper we reach into space.</p>
<p>I came across an example of how they contradict themselves in this way which I have copied below.</p>
<p>RADIO SIGNAL SENSITIVITY</p>
<p>The upgrade features a new system for focusing radio signals using a system of Gregorian reflectors, a new, more powerful 1 million watt radar transmitter and a 50ft high steel mesh ground screen to reduce ground interference. The facility, operated by Cornell University&#8217;s National Astronomy and Ionosphere Centre (NAIC) under co-operative agreement with the NSF, was upgraded with funds from the NSF and NASA at a cost of approximately $27 million.</p>
<p>The upgrade, the second since the facility was built in 1963, allows scientists to do in one hour what previously took 10 hours. The sensitivity was improved by a factor of about 20 for studies of the solar system and by a factor of about three or four for studies of distant galaxies. More <a title="Radio frequency" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency">radio frequencies</a> are now available with increased sensitivity at all frequencies. Astronomers will be able to &#8216;observe&#8217; signals farther away, and thus further back in time, than ever before. The telescope&#8217;s frequency range, and thus its sensitivity, previously 50MHz to 3,000MHz, is now 10,000MHz.<br />
REFLECTOR DISH AND ANTENNA</p>
<p>Unchanged in the upgrade is Arecibo&#8217;s trademark reflector dish. Most radio telescopes use a parabolic antenna that can be steered to any direction. The Arecibo antenna is spherical and remains fixed but the focusing device suspended above the dish can be steered. Thus, signals can be captured from a greater slice of the sky. A radio/radar telescope captures and transmits radiation at radio wavelengths, unlike <a title="Optical telescope" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_telescope">optical telescopes</a>, which capture light waves. So clouds, haze and even daylight do not interfere with radio astronomy.</p>
<p>The system suspended above the dish to focus the radio waves collected by the 1,000ft diameter (305m) reflector has been radically changed. Now, a new six-storey, 90t dome houses a new reflector system, a combination of two radio mirrors and sensitive receiver systems. It is suspended 450ft above the giant reflector dish. The mirrors focus radio waves coming from distant objects in space or radar signals that are sent out into space and bounce back from the surfaces of the planets and other bodies in the solar system.</p>
<p>Read that and tell me how you can bounce radio waves off of light projecting from something that is supposed to have died light years ago, or fix radio waves on light reaching us now from a constellation that formed light years ago.<br />
The source of the light HAS to be there still or the radio signal would carry on past it if it hadn&#8217;t enough &#8220;mass&#8221; to stop it.</p>
<p>It does pass through the light projected by the source until it reaches the &#8220;mass&#8221; then it bounces back to the receiver, the light from the source becoming stronger and narrowing nearest the source, acting as all light does, stronger at the source and spreading and weakening as it travels outward.</p>
<p>I am not debating that light travels, nor am I debating the speed of light, only that what we are observing out there is happening NOW not light years ago.<br />
Not only is the light traveling to us, but we are reaching out to that &#8220;light source&#8221; nullifying any time lapse, and nullifying the notion that we can go back in time.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/f489e57d-f3d2-4872-b970-98ab49f09c96/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f489e57d-f3d2-4872-b970-98ab49f09c96" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/580-electromagnetic-radiation-our-universal-penetration/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The puzzle gravity creates</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/346-the-puzzle-gravity-creates</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/346-the-puzzle-gravity-creates#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG BANG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth's atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gravitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image by rmforall@comcast.net via Flickr By Donald Swarbrick. Gravity is one of the biggest problems we have when trying to understand the way the universe works, because we still are trying to figure out how it works, and the importance of its function. We know it is essential to the way the universe is held [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em">
<div>
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/68744821@N00/3103431641"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3042/3103431641_7aac98f5fc_m.jpg" alt="#91 astrodeep200407aab10aa.png 4.12 MB 1244X12..." width="240" height="240" /></a></dt>
<dd>Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/68744821@N00/3103431641">rmforall@comcast.net</a> via Flickr</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>By Donald Swarbrick.</p>
<p>Gravity is one of the biggest problems we have when trying to understand the way the universe works, because we still are trying to figure out how it works, and the importance of its function.<br />
We know it is essential to the way the universe is held together, but if we cannot understand it, then we cannot progress with our understanding of the universe as a whole, and some theories will remain theories.</p>
<p>It is my conjecture that gravity was needed to create the Big Bang, as I explained in earlier chapters of &#8220;unfeatheredangels&#8221; by gasses contorting as they met, which eventually resulted in the first spinning effect as they reacted with each other.<br />
This in turn created a giant vortex, the suction to draw everything from the atmosphere within billions of light years in circumference into its center, which would include the ingredients that made up the universe.</p>
<p>All the ingredients were around, they only needed the reaction to bring them together, and this massive vortex was the answer.<br />
Everything was mixed up and spat out by the <a title="Chemical reaction" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_reaction">chemical reaction</a> created inside the vortex, by all the ingredients interacting to create the Big Bang, which sent solids, liquids, and gasses, spinning out into the space we are still careering through.</p>
<p>We are still being carried by the blast, that is why the planets are moving further apart, and the galaxies still stretching out through space.</p>
<p>Gravity was started by the spinning motion, and it is simply the orbs that make up the galaxies that are punching their way through space, while spinning and clearing air from their path, both on their outward journey away from the blast, plus the air they are clearing during their rotation on their axes, creating a vortex around them. The suction is in the lower layer, and the surge in the upper layer of the draft, which creates GRAVITY as we know it.</p>
<p>It is more the air or the atmosphere they are clearing during their rotation on their axes, that causes gravity as we know it, pulling objects down towards them that are a certain distance away from them,or inside the bubble created by the rotation, while bouncing others back off into space if they hit the bubble.</p>
<p>Draft is gravity, just like the draft you get when you slam a door, but the displacement of air is the cause of the gravity around the planets of the universe, because they are spinning.</p>
<p>If you are standing on one side of the door the displacement will push you, but if you are standing on the other side you will feel suction or drag, but because the door is only opening and shutting, and not spinning, you won&#8217;t create gravity.</p>
<p>A sphere on the other hand creates both suction, and the surge of air ahead of it, and as it is spinning the suction, and surge combine to create gravity. The pull downwards, and the bounce outwards, is the suction, and the surge reacting with the spinning motion as they fight with each other.<br />
If it was a rectangle shape, or a square, the punching motion would always be at the front of the object heading through space, and the suction always at the rear, but with the spherical shape none of them has the upper hand, but both are present.<br />
Its simple aerodynamics, if you were at the front of the rectangle, under the air rushing past you would be forced down onto the surface, but if you were at the back you would be brushed off by the air disturbance rushing past taking you away from the object, like a comet shedding particals constantly, as it moves through space.</p>
<p>Gravity can have an effect further away from the sphere than we have calculated, because it could be displacing the atmosphere miles further out from the gravitational pull we know of, and that is what holds smaller planets and Moons in their grasp.</p>
<p>Our Sun&#8217;s gravitational pull holds all the planets that we have discovered in our solar system and keeps them together to make up the solar system we know of, and the same thing is happening in other parts of the universe, making up galaxies, which in turn affects all other objects hurtling out in the blast created by the Big Bang.</p>
<p>Therefore the gravity created by the spinning motion of all the objects in the universe, reaches out further away from the objects than we first thought and creates the bases that holds the universe together in the form we know, plus the fact that all these objects are still hurtling away from the original blast.</p>
<p>When our spaceships force there way through earth&#8217;s gravitational pull, they enter into what appears to us as space and weightlessness, but the thin atmosphere they enter into could also be moving around along with the pull of the Sun, and although it has not been measured or noticed by us, this movement could still have a significant effect on the rest of the objects spinning around in the universe.</p>
<p>The newly discovered ring around Saturn is evidence that this is probable, as the dust particles making up the ring are eight million miles away from the planet.<br />
Therefore the gravitational pull of Saturn has at least a radius of eight million miles, probably more.</p>
<p>Also every other object that spins around in the universe could have an effect on every other piece of Big Bang debris, if the atmosphere that surrounds each object blasting away from the original explosion, carries its thin atmosphere around with it.<br />
There are particals in the space between planets,and stars,it is not a vacuum, or heat would not travel through it.</p>
<p>This unmeasured action of movement of thinning atmospheres that surrounds all the spheres could be the reason the universe does not collapse or collide, during its ever outward journey away from the core of the blast, as it acts like a cushion holding everything in its place, or in other words, holding the universe together.<br />
The very answer to the question mentioned at the beginning of this post, the question that we need to answer before we can progress.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2009/nov/04/horizon-gordon-ramsay&amp;a=9191390&amp;rid=223761d7-180b-4951-81c7-0d68a536adc4&amp;e=5e6a2a74dd727fbd971a0e8bbbdd72a8">Horizon: Who&#8217;s Afraid of a Big Black Hole? and Gordon Ramsay&#8217;s F Word | TV review</a> (guardian.co.uk)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.space.com/common/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&amp;t=20677">FORUM: How Do We Track Galaxy Motions?</a> (space.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/223761d7-180b-4951-81c7-0d68a536adc4/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=223761d7-180b-4951-81c7-0d68a536adc4" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/346-the-puzzle-gravity-creates/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biblical nuclear weapons.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/328-biblical-nuclear-weapons</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/328-biblical-nuclear-weapons#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book of Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear weapon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sodom and Gomorrah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warfare and Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Donald Swarbrick. Image via Wikipedia Image via Wikipedia If you think it is an unbelievable theory to think that aircraft, or flying machines are being described in the book of Ezekiel, and would like to believe, or mock the idea, I wonder what you think happened in this next theory of mine, that no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Donald Swarbrick.</p>
<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/SuojyQijiwI/AAAAAAAAAXk/f_IqU1sTh9I/s1600-h/hiroshima_and_nagasaki_victims_nuclear_bombing.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px;text-align: center;cursor: pointer;width: 400px;height: 301px" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/SuojyQijiwI/AAAAAAAAAXk/f_IqU1sTh9I/s400/hiroshima_and_nagasaki_victims_nuclear_bombing.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p style="margin: 1em;float: right;width: 310px">
<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em">
<div>
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:John_Martin_-_Sodom_and_Gomorrah.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e1/John_Martin_-_Sodom_and_Gomorrah.jpg/300px-John_Martin_-_Sodom_and_Gomorrah.jpg" alt="Sodom and Gomorrha, a painting by :en:John Mar..." width="300" height="192" /></a></dt>
<dd>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:John_Martin_-_Sodom_and_Gomorrah.jpg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p><span>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:John_Martin_-_Sodom_and_Gomorrah.jpg">Wikipedia</a></span></p>
<p>If you think it is an unbelievable theory to think that <a title="Aircraft" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft">aircraft</a>, or flying machines are being described in the <a title="Book of Ezekiel" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Ezekiel">book of Ezekiel</a>, and would like to believe, or mock the idea, I wonder what you think happened in this next theory of mine, that no one else has thought of as far as I know.</p>
<p>The story should be familiar to most of us, but we have never questioned the cause or the outcome.</p>
<p>We have the case of <a title="Sodom and Gomorrah" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodom_and_Gomorrah">Sodom and Gomorrah</a> where in Genesis we have the event of the cities being destroyed because of all the sinful things taking place, which made god angry enough to carry out the deed, but what we have to ask is, how was this deed carried out so completely with the armament that was around in these times?</p>
<p><a title="Bow (weapon)" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_%28weapon%29">Bows and arrows</a>, which was the main weapon in these times, cannot destroy a building never mind a city, and we have to remember it was two &#8220;Cities&#8221; we are talking about not two small towns or villages, so where was the power to carry out the deed when nothing explosive was invented then?<br />
Natural volcanoes yes, but the description of the devastation left is nothing like the damage a volcano makes, bad though it may be.</p>
<p>If you read Genesis, chapter nineteen verse one, it reads, &#8220;And there came two angels to Sodam at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodam; and he bowed himself with his face towards the ground;&#8221; No mention of feathers when angels appear, but why should there be when they have none.</p>
<p>Lot was told by the angels to flee the city because it was about to be destroyed, and to take some of his family with him.<br />
He did as he was told, so he must have known the task was possible by these people called angels.</p>
<p>In Genesis chapter 19, verse 17 It reads &#8220;And it came to pass when they had brought them forth abroad, that he said. Escape for thy life; look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain; escape to the mountain lest thou be consumed.&#8221;</p>
<p>They had to be miles away from the city to make sure they were out of reach of the blast, but what weapons in these times could cause so much devastation?<br />
Verse 24 of the same chapter reads &#8220;Then the lord rained upon Sodam and upon Gomorrah <a title="Fire and brimstone" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_and_brimstone">fire and brimstone</a> and fire from the lord out of heaven.</p>
<p>OUT OF HEAVEN&#8230;&#8230;not from the earth, but the crafts in the skies, that brought this advanced race of people here.</p>
<p>Now reading that story one hundred years ago even, you might not understand what was happening, but it should be clear enough now.</p>
<p>The next few verses makes it a bit clearer, 25, reads &#8220;And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground.&#8221;<br />
Verse 26, refers to the line in verse 17 &#8220;Look not behind thee&#8221; and quotes<br />
&#8220;But his wife looked back and became a pillar of salt.<br />
Verse 28, And he looked toward Sodom and Gomorrah and toward all the land of the plain; and beheld, and lo, the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace.&#8221;</p>
<p>When you think of the devastation left behind, people from this day and age should only have one clear thought in their heads, HIROSHIMA and NAGASAKI, the two cities destroyed by nuclear bombs to end the second world war.</p>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/Suoln9CE-EI/AAAAAAAAAXs/MHYh0fVGe8I/s1600-h/Hiroshima_Nagasaki_in_1945_1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px;text-align: center;cursor: pointer;width: 294px;height: 400px" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/Suoln9CE-EI/AAAAAAAAAXs/MHYh0fVGe8I/s400/Hiroshima_Nagasaki_in_1945_1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Only a power such as that could come anywhere near to causing all that destruction, and the blast cause Lots wife to be turned into a pillar of salt.</p>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/SuomR-zR77I/AAAAAAAAAX0/qQ4D9wetfLE/s1600-h/Hiroshima_Nagasaki_in_1945_3.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt;float: left;cursor: pointer;width: 300px;height: 300px" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/SuomR-zR77I/AAAAAAAAAX0/qQ4D9wetfLE/s400/Hiroshima_Nagasaki_in_1945_3.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>All we have to do in this day and age is to look up the Internet and compare the destruction of the Sodom and Gomorrah and the scene described by Lot in the bible, to the scenes described by the pilots who overflew the Japanese cities, and look at the pictures taken of the aftermath, and the devastation caused by the nuclear bombs.<br />
They are almost identical, and the reason for that is, it was the same method used in both instances.</p>
<p>So you might say, there were no nuclear bombs in biblical times, but you also thought there were no aircraft flying around the skies, so what is your conclusion now you know such a bomb exists.</p>
<p>Lot, and the people of his time have an excuse to wonder at the destruction, but WE should know the cause, and now realize there are people around the skies who are way ahead of us in developments, who used <a title="Nuclear weapon" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon">nuclear weapons</a> years before we invented them, and have reached us from their planet in crafts we are still trying to come to terms with.</p>
<p>What other answer could there be?</p></div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/cfc1be4e-fd4d-4a33-91b0-45e2089fd7e3/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=cfc1be4e-fd4d-4a33-91b0-45e2089fd7e3" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"> </span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/328-biblical-nuclear-weapons/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The star from the east</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/315-315</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/315-315#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baptism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Donald Swarbrick. Here is something else to ponder, if you want to compare events in the bible to what we know today. How would the people from biblical times describe the vision in the picture above? This is an example of how the star in the east could have come about, when all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-320" src="http://thephilosopherschair.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/s_Night_ground_IMG_59714.JPG" alt="s_Night_ground_IMG_5971" width="800" height="448" /></p>
<p>By Donald Swarbrick.</p>
<p>Here is something else to ponder, if you want to compare events in the bible to what we know today.</p>
<p>How would the people from biblical times describe the vision in the picture above?</p>
<p>This is an example of how the star in the east could have come about, when all the time it was an aircraft, never seen in the skies in these times, a simple case of mistaken identity, due to lack of knowledge.</p>
<p>It might not be exactly how we would describe it in this day and age if it were to have taken place yesterday, but it gives one example of how reporters could translate it to the newspapers, given our knowledge now.</p>
<p><a title="Matthew, Mark, Luke and John" rel="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Matthew-Mark-Luke-John-Pearl/dp/9997501985%3FSubscriptionId%3D0G81C5DAZ03ZR9WH9X82%26tag%3Dzemanta-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D9997501985">Matthew, Mark, Luke and John</a>, each give their account of events at the time of Jesus conception, birth and early life, and regardless of the many translations of these gospels, plus the description of four different men of these times, there is a strong indication that the phenomenal occurrences that happened were influenced by superior beings from another planet.</p>
<p>If we take a look at some of the important factors described by these four individuals, we should see how much easier it would have been to prove the existence of space travelers if they had the technology of the world we live in today. If they had the same knowledge as people from the twenty first century or, if the events we are going to look at happened in this day and age everything described would be more clear cut, although the fear of God would still he present. This was the time of King Herod and in his domain so with the prophecies about this new born child’s future threatening his ruler ship he ordered its death. The Wise Men who, had been guided towards the child’s birthplace by what has been accepted as a star, told Herod of the birth, of the importance of the child, of their intention to visit him and present him with gifts.</p>
<p>There are no stars in the sky capable of guiding anyone to a particular place on <a title="Earth" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth">earth’s surface</a> in such a way, (although sailors in the early days before, the compass was invented used stars for guidance, it was not in the same way as this event recorded in the bible) so my assumption is that the bright light was a small craft or power pack used by an “angel” within earth’s atmosphere which would give the appearance of a star to the more primitive people of that era.</p>
<p>The people around the Middle Eastern countries in these times knew something exceptional was taking place but could not fathom exactly what; making them create the mystique that has been deciphered from the scriptures. The Wise Men were so called in my estimation, because they understood what the light meant, although not what it was, but they had accepted the existence of God hence the reason they were chosen. They had been told of Herod’s plan to kill God’s son, (through mental telepathy) which they describe as a dream, and would most likely have appeared to them as such with God and his crews not wanting to reveal too much of their powers. They disobeyed Herod’s wish for them to return and tell him of the whereabouts of the child, taking another route home.</p>
<p>At the same time an angel (which we have established are God’s crew carrying messages to earthlings from the spaceships above) warned Joseph to flee to Egypt with Mary and the baby, as Herod was going to kill all the boys of two years or under, making sure the baby who threatened his dominance would be exterminated. Joseph and his family had been sent to a land that was well known to God’s crews, to await Herod’s death, the news of which would be relayed to him in the usual way by an angel. This was another strange occurrence Joseph had come to accept proving his belief in God’s existence, although not fully understanding, had complete faith in his guidance, taking Jesus to Nazareth where he would spend his early years. All these events had been foretold by the early prophets, so they came as no surprise to the more intelligent people of the time, one of whom was John or John the Baptist as he was to be known, as it was he who was chosen to baptize God’s son.</p>
<p>John had already been telling the earthlings about God and his crews from Heaven and as their spaceships had been present (although disguised) in the skies, and, they had been influencing life on earth for some time it stands to reason the news of them was beginning to spread, just as they had planned. They wanted their existence to be known, but could never make the earthlings fully understand where they came from and why they were so advanced compared to them, When the myths and mystique grew around them they used it to their advantage as it created the required effect, gaining the attention of the people towards the warnings about earth’s demise and the safe haven of Heaven the space travelers had to offer.</p>
<p>John the Baptist had the sense to realise what was taking place, he had heard of the prophecies that had been ignored before and knew of “the wrath of the Gods”. It says in Matthew Chapter three verse sixteen that after, Jesus was baptized by John, “the heavens were opened and he saw the spirit of God descending like a dove.” And a voice from Heaven said this is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased. More reason to believe spacecraft were in the skies above, or would you rather believe in a mystical character floating on vaporized water with feathered wings rather than the more logical explanation of people inside spacecraft, hovering above the earth. I can understand people of two thousand years ago thinking the ridiculous, but it puzzles me why in this day of space travel, primitive as it is, earthlings still believe in the myths of angels with harps and feathered wings floating on clouds.</p>
<p>We have updated the Bible into modern language, but still hold on to the myths and evade the reality. If a true translation were to be written, the events after the <a title="Baptism of Jesus" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptism_of_Jesus">baptism of Jesus</a> would read like this, “after the baptism, as Jesus came out of the water, God who had been watching from the spaceship revealed the presence of the craft by sliding back the door underneath it allowing the inner lights to beam down to earth where he then descended from in his smaller craft (used only in the inner hemisphere) to where they were, while transmitting the message through the loudspeakers saying, THIS IS MY BELOVED SON IN WHOM I AM WELL PLEASED”!</p>
<p>These were the only moments the armada above could be spotted and as the witnesses did not understand fully what they were looking up into, they tried to express it the only way they knew, providing us with the mystique that we have come to connect Heaven with. Jesus was then led out into the wilderness to be tempted by the Devil where his allegiance to his father GOD would be tested to the limit, proving he was without the sinful worldly nature the earthlings possessed even though he was part earthling. When you read through the Bible, you begin to realise why it was interpreted in this way through the years, with present day man still wanting to pretend that he is the only intelligent life in the Universe. A power such as I am unfolding to you now is better thought of as being a spiritual, unrealistic force rather than face up to the fact that they are real and can reappear in our skies at anytime! It’s this fear of the unknown that makes man reject these things, but if he began to accept them for what they really are, they would realise it is only the devil’s ships they have to fear, as they will have a big say, as to where our destiny lies, (the planet Heaven or the planet Hell!)</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://codybateman.org/2009/10/17/proof-3/">18 Areas the American Church Has Been Deceived &#8211; part IV</a> (codybateman.org)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/jul/12/religion-christianity-belief-science&amp;a=6153802&amp;rid=6d515f6b-fdc8-43bc-8a75-108387d2d9d6&amp;e=c49ff643025e16f326bad1c2ad7f2250">Metaphysical mistake</a> (guardian.co.uk)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/6d515f6b-fdc8-43bc-8a75-108387d2d9d6/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6d515f6b-fdc8-43bc-8a75-108387d2d9d6" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/315-315/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angels with wheels, and virtual reality.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/295-angels-with-wheels</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/295-angels-with-wheels#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezekiel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerusalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual reality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia By Donald Swarbrick Carrying on in the same theme from last week, you might like to set your mind working on other instruments, mentioned in Ezekiel that resembles some of the technology used in our world today. If you read these chapters and look at it with the knowledge we have today, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em">
<div>
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AC89-0437-20_a.jpeg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/AC89-0437-20_a.jpeg/300px-AC89-0437-20_a.jpeg" alt="Virtual reality uses multimedia content. Appli..." width="300" height="301" /></a></dt>
<dd>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AC89-0437-20_a.jpeg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left">By Donald Swarbrick</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Carrying on in the same theme from last week, you might like to set your mind working on other instruments, mentioned in <a class="zem_slink" title="Ezekiel" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezekiel">Ezekiel</a> that resembles some of the technology used in our world today.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">If you read these chapters and look at it with the knowledge we have today, the gadgets and ways of communication seem more familiar,than strange, because it is items we use in everyday life.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Take a look.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">In Chapter five it verifies that God and his crews centered their earth mission in Jerusalem, a place they helped create and will become more relevant later. We have to remember that Ezekiel was chosen as a prophet and his job was to warn what was, or is, going to befall earth when the last days approach and what we have to do to survive these horrific events, also that we can be punished by God before this if, we continue to disregard his existence.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Chapter six is explaining that when the word of the prophets reach other countries their stories will become distorted through time and distance and as there is no positive evidence of their existence, false Gods will be invented to worship. Was this not the case with the Vikings and other races I have mentioned in this book? Only in years to come, when God returns with his crafts and the earthlings see the proof first hand, will they realise that God and his crews the Bible tells of are, travelers from a PLANET called Heaven and they do exist. Although most religions on earth make God out to be all good, belies the fact that he is only going to save and reward the ones who deserves it. We tend to forget the punishments handed out to unbelievers in the Bible and the terrible atrocities brought to bear on them by the supreme God.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Chapter seven reminds us of this in no uncertain terms, where in Verse Four states, “and mine eye shall not spare thee, neither will I have pity, but I will recompense thy ways upon thee, and thine abominations shall be in the midst of thee, AND YE SHALL KNOW THAT I AM THE LORD.” Verse seven goes on to tell of how in the last days, when the evil that will end earth’s existence begins, God’s ships will be there to save us, but only once they judge to see if we are fit to live the rest of our lives on their planet Heaven, or if we will be banished to the Devil’s ships and taken to Hell.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Try Verse Eight onwards for confirmation and bring to mind that we have to answer for the way we conduct ourselves down here. The God we have been brainwashed into believing in is more human that we have been taught not, a ghostly vision. The human element is there although, evolved on a different planet, the likenesses are the same as us here on earth after all we were made in his likeness. God from Heaven evolved from the same matter as we did its only their abundance of knowledge, accumulated over the billions of years start they had on us, plus their ability to utilise every useful morsel in the universe by reaching them first that makes them the superior race of all the stars within and out, with our vision. Even so we are told not to be afraid of them because they don’t mean any harm to the good of earth. It stands to reason that if they have perfected life up in their own planet, they won’t want evil, pollution or disease carried back to upset the tranquillity of Heaven.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Evil and the devil’s presence are still on earth and the rivalry between the planets of <a class="zem_slink" title="Heaven and Hell (essay)" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_and_Hell_%28essay%29">Heaven and Hell</a> still goes on although the dispute between God and the Devil is over as each has their own planet now. The Devil is still attempting to lure people to his planet to assist in the running of it, whereas God has perfected his planet and when the good go there, they will experience that perfect life promised to us by him.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Chapter Eight gives us the impression of a vision taking shape among shimmering laser lights where a journey of <a title="Virtual reality" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality">virtual reality</a> begins, if you just picture a computer today, with each press of the mouse, unfolding chambers leading through each phase until your goal is reached or, the story told, then you should be able to understand Ezekiel’s attempt at describing his virtual reality experience, even though the computer used would be far superior to anything we have on earth today. It goes to prove, for every new invention we come up with here, the Gods have already perfected it long ago. All through Chapter Eight, verses begin with “he said unto me” or God guiding Ezekiel through his journey of virtual reality, instructing him on how to use the complicated device, showing him the events God wished him to see. Even at the beginning of Chapter Nine it says “he cried also in mine ears with a loud voice saying,” which could be God’s equivalent to our earphones, although a much more sophisticated version, (like an implanted micro-chip) or simply mental telepathy would be a more likely answer.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Virtual reality helmets could be used for various things, but still run on the same basis that we use them for on earth. It carries on into Chapter Ten when we have a description of the <a class="zem_slink" title="Spacecraft" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecraft">space craft</a> again and in Verse Ten, “as for their appearances they four had one likeness, as if a wheel had been in the midst of a wheel.” A reference to the gyroscopic power source situated at each corner of the craft used by the crews traveling to and from the mother craft in the sky above perhaps, or just a <a class="zem_slink" title="Jet engine" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_engine">jet engine</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Verse Sixteen of Chapter Ten would confirm this if the events were described by someone from this century, instead of a person from so far back in time. “And when the cherubims went, the wheels went by them, and when the cherubims lifted up their wings to mount up from the earth the same wheels also turned not from beside them. Just to give more credence to my theory I will have to stress the fact that these visions, called angels, have wheels which when depicted in paintings or in imaginations, do not have wheels! Now, do you agree that it is time to look at them through different eyes?</p>
<p style="text-align: left">In Verse Twenty One where we read again, “Every one had four faces apiece, and everyone four wings and the likeness of the hands of a man was under their wings. Ezekiel’s descriptions of these events are difficult for us to understand but would that not be the arms of the man under the wings of his power source? This seems to be a clear indication of craft like this being on the earth, if not, what else would it have been?</p>
<p style="text-align: left">When we think of visitors from another planet we should not always think of them as warriors with all the doom and gloom, portrayed by the cinema, they are after all just like us, and although there is plenty violence on earth we also have our light hearted moments, as will they.      The description of the spacecraft could be made more difficult for us to understand if they had transfers or murals covering outer bodywork the way truckers of today have, or if some of their craft were moulded in the fashion of creatures faces similar to the way some vehicles on our roads appear to have a face and personality. This would make it harder for earthlings of days gone by to describe the strange features on the craft and, if faces of creatures from far off planets were painted on them it is easy to see how Ezekiel would have been confused with this vision before him never, seen on earth, until that moment. There has never been anything on earth resembling these descriptions, other than then, when we were being visited by our friends from Heaven.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Try as I might I just cannot get the full picture of these flying machines or, the actual way they are propelled, but when we get our chance to see them it will all become clear.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">If I were to see them, at least I would have a better idea of how they worked, and would be able to understand their purpose, and capabilities, not being awestruck by their presence like the poeple from the past.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">If any of us saw them we could describe them better, so why do we find it hard to believe, that it is machines that are being talked about instead of thinking about feathered flying people, and communications, and visions coming from thin air?</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://codybateman.org/2009/08/21/book/">Explaining the Books of Gods Judgments</a> (codybateman.org)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091006102637.htm">Brain-Computer Interface Allows Person-to-person Communication Through Power Of Thought</a> (sciencedaily.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/ebooks/how_google_earth_will_change_digital_travel_publishing_140302.asp?c=rss">How Google Earth Will Change Digital Travel Publishing</a> (mediabistro.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/9537272d-90b4-4a93-b822-9161d9e5be54/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=9537272d-90b4-4a93-b822-9161d9e5be54" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/295-angels-with-wheels/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No feathers on these angels.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/290-no-feathers-on-these-angels</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/290-no-feathers-on-these-angels#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezekiel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firmament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By.Donald Swarbrick. In my last post I was trying to give an example of how things would have been described by people from these time, and how they used the only items around them to try to explain events they were witnessing but had no concept of what really was going on. The words and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By.Donald Swarbrick.</p>
<p>In my last post I was trying to give an example of how things would have been described by people from these time, and how they used the only items around them to try to explain events they were witnessing but had no concept of what really was going on.</p>
<p>The words and descriptions that were used then would take on a completely different form, as we now know more about the universe, and have built machines that can fly not only inside our atmosphere but go out into space, albeit not too far.</p>
<p>It might come as a shock if another craft from another part of the universe landed here today, but we would understand more about it and be able to describe the event in a more logical way.</p>
<p>What I am trying to say is the events recorded in the Old Testament by Ezekiel would have been more explicit if  they had the knowledge we have today.</p>
<p>I will give you an example by showing you another excerpt from &#8220;unfeatheredangels&#8221; (Which quotes the bible)  and then have you try and picture what Ezekiel is trying to describe in todays terms.</p>
<h3><a href="http://unfeatheredangels.blogspot.com/2008/12/no-feathers-flying-here.html">no feathers flying here</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/ScfH1yyWO-I/AAAAAAAAAGw/gFcr0YwIdmk/s1600-h/yvesrossy.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 320px; float: left; height: 190px; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_GqOSFt4HRoo/ScfH1yyWO-I/AAAAAAAAAGw/gFcr0YwIdmk/s320/yvesrossy.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
CHAPTER NINE<br />
UNFEARTHERED ANGELS<br />
“<a title="Ezekiel" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezekiel">Ezekiel</a>”, holds the key to my theory and when we can crack this code, we will know the secrets and mysteries of the skies and of course unfold the truth of our own destiny. If ever anyone was trying to describe aircraft or power packs attached to men, Ezekiel is, giving a more intriguing and believable insight to the crafts from Heaven than any other report we have read, even in comparison to the latest sightings in our era. </p>
<p>Chapter one verse one, (the last two lines,) “The Heavens were opened and I saw visions of God.” If the mother ships were camouflaged by clouds, or the <a title="Space station" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_station">space station</a> was large enough to be observed from earth it would only be a case of the doors of the spaceship or station, being opened creating the illusion of the Heavens opening to an earthling, with God emerging from it on some kind of small craft. That is the scene we should picture today, not some ghostly figure emerging from thin air as we have been led to believe. </p>
<p>A spaceship ten miles long and two miles wide is a massive construction when compared to aircraft on earth, but the planet Heaven as we have established is massive in comparison to earth so it could follow that any human forms, or man-made objects from Heaven would he much larger than earth. Imagine an object of that proportion appearing in our skies at cloud level, its apparition blending in with the clouds and a large hatch opening from underneath allowing a person from within to stand at it, with the interior lights shinning behind him showing him in silhouette. </p>
<p>Is that not the description the Bible gives when God appears from Heaven, and is the Bible’s account of these events not the way a man from two thousand years ago or more would have described such a frightening occurrence? Nobody seemed to pick up on the connection in the Bible between the colossal structures built at the time of the Pharaohs and the fact that God was on and around the earth at that time. The reason for this is that they are too busy looking at the mystical side of things and not the practical side. They don’t seem to want God to be a person who evolved like their selves albeit, in a much larger form, they want to look on him through the same eyes as our less technically advanced ancestors. </p>
<p>The people chosen by God to foretell our destiny (Ezekiel being one) were shown images of events about to happen, some imminent at that time others had not occurred even yet but will happen in the very near future. Ezekiel also had the privilege to see first hand the different types of craft used by God’s crews.<br />
I am going to quote most of chapter one of Ezekiel and translate it in the way it should be translated in this day and age. Starting from verse four “ And I looked, and behold, a great whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud and a fire unfolding itself, and a brightness was about it, and out of the midst, thereof as the colour of amber, out of the midst of the fire.</p>
<p>” VERSE FIVE “Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures, and this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a man.” SIX “And every one had four faces and every one had four wings.” SEVEN “And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was like the sole of a calf’s foot; and they sparkled like the colour of burnished brass.” EIGHT “And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four sides; and they four had their faces and their wings.</p>
<p>” NINE “Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they went; and they went every one straight forward.” TEN “As for the likeness of their faces, they four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion on the right side; and they had the face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an eagle.” ELEVEN “thus were their faces; and their wings were stretched upwards; two wings of every one were joined to one another, and two covered their bodies.” TWELVE “And they went every one straight forward; whither the spirit was to go, they went and they turned not when they went.</p>
<p>” THIRTEEN “As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps; it went up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright and out of the fire went forth lightning.” FOURTEEN “And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a flash of lightning.” FIFTEEN “Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.” SIXTEEN “The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl; and they four had one likeness; and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.” SEVENTEEN “When they went they went upon their four sides; and they turned not when they went.” EIGHTEEN “As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.</p>
<p>” NINETEEN “And when the living creatures went, the wheels went by them; and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up.” TWENTY “Whither soever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted up over against them; for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.” TWENTY ONE “When those went these went; and when those stood these stood; and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up over against them; for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.” TWENTY THREE “And under the firmament were their wings straight, the one toward the other; every one had two which covered on this side, and every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies.” TWENTY FOUR “And when they went I heard the noise of their wings, like the noise of great waters, as the voice of the almighty, the voice of speech, as the noise of an host; when they stood they let down their wings.”</p>
<p>It should not take much imagination of people from the twenty first century to see what is really being described in these verses of Ezekiel; it would take more of an imagination now, to interpret them in the way that has been handed down to us, as if they were monsters or creatures unknown to us. Nevertheless here is my version without quoting all the Chapters.</p>
<p>Engines and rotor blades create whirlwinds as I have already mentioned and the cloud and the fire would be one way of describing the exhaust trail they leave especially if you have never see an example of this before. They appeared to look like men because they were men with power packs which would be one of their methods of getting around earth and going between there and their ships or space stations. The four faces and four wings are easily explained when you visualise the small flying machines we use in today’s world. </p>
<p>The very description of the visions in this chapter is exactly how I would expect someone from these times to describe the flying machine attached to the man who flew across the English Channel that I mention in this book. The description of wings in the bible when moving never flap, ( under the firmament were their wings straight) they always make loud noises and cause a draft (whirlwind) and the spirit that was in the living creature and in the wheels mentioned, was the engine or the power source. The creatures appeared and disappeared like a flash of lightning which would be fast, with a trail off the jet engine or power source attached to their bodies. In these times there should be no doubt from anybody what the machines are and there should be no doubting that we are not alone in the universe.</p>
<p>What else could these things be that are being described in Ezekiel other that flying machines, machines that would be described in a very different way today if we seen them with our own eyes.</p>
<p>Your views will be very much appreciated.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b347812f-cb55-411d-9303-c09d26a8d160/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b347812f-cb55-411d-9303-c09d26a8d160" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/290-no-feathers-on-these-angels/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angels without feathers.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/279-angels-without-feathers</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/279-angels-without-feathers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek mythology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immortality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Donald Swarbrick. Image via Wikipedia I have used an excerpt from &#8220;unfeatheredangels&#8221; this week to remind you where the idea of feathered angels came from, and to give you time to think how you would describe a vision such as an angel today if it were to fly about with wings. We know now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Donald Swarbrick.</p>
<p style="margin: 1em; width: 212px; float: right;"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ezekiel.jpg"><img style="border: medium none" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Ezekiel.jpg/202px-Ezekiel.jpg" alt="The prophet Ezekiel, Sistine Chapel" width="202" height="278" /></a><span>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ezekiel.jpg">Wikipedia</a></span></p>
<p>I have used an excerpt from &#8220;unfeatheredangels&#8221; this week to remind you where the idea of feathered angels came from, and to give you time to think how you would describe a vision such as an angel today if it were to fly about with wings. We know now that wings are not all made with feathers, and that man can fly, so why hold on to myths?</p>
<p>Chapter Thirty Seven of Ezekiel makes me realise the importance of having our remains kept buried and untouched until  Gods return to make their promise of <a title="Immortality" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortality">everlasting life</a> a reality. Not so very long ago mankind would never believe such a feat possible and when reading the Bible wondered, just how it could be carried out if at all. With each advancement man makes in medicine, each promise of  God becomes more understandable.</p>
<p>I used to wonder, how we could live forever! How was it possible to come back from the dead? God has shown Ezekiel, who in turn is telling us that it is possible, through his demonstration of bringing an army back to life from a pile of dried bones, and I quote, “the hand of the Lord was upon me, and carried me out in the spirit of the Lord, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones.” Note, Ezekiel never traveled by donkey which was the main means of transport then, he traveled by some kind of craft which he describes as “the spirit of the Lord”. Verse five, “thus saith the Lord God unto these bones, I will cause breath to enter into you and ye shall live.”</p>
<p>The chapter goes on to describe how God brings a pile of bones back from the dead, in a way that is almost possible in today’s world with our advances in D.N.A and cloning. Archaeologists think they can desecrate graves without repercussion of people who lived hundreds of years ago, but it makes you wonder if in the future, when, “the dead in Christ shall rise,” that the harm done at that time might make a difference then! Probably not, as nothing seems to be impossible to God but we should still give it some consideration when excavating the graves of our ancestors as they in their form now, might be looking down on us and watching the way we deal with their remains.</p>
<p>God has shown Ezekiel by this deed that they have the means to overcome any obstacle, standing in their way. They have allowed secrets to unfold, to the chosen few and through the prophets tried to warn mankind, just how powerful and advanced their nation beyond the stars has become. Before we leave Ezekiel, bear in mind that the paintings hung around our art galleries and palatial buildings of <a title="Cherub" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherub">cherubim</a> s and angels with feathered wings and human faces have brainwashed us into believing, they are the true images of the power packs or small craft God and his people used while carrying out their duties on earth. In reality, a cherubim was a type of spacecraft the angels (as they had come to be known by) used to travel between earth and the mother ship above.</p>
<p>The angels were messengers of god who would have looked as normal as we do but by their use of the cherubim s, (small aircraft used within earth’s atmosphere) they have been depicted with feathered wings, in <a title="Greek mythology" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_mythology">Greek legend</a> and such like philosophy from the vague descriptions given in the Bible. At the time, when the first images of these angels were being brought to life in paintings or statues by famous artists of the past, birds were the only known thing to man that could fly, so it stands to reason that the images conjured up in their minds of people flying, would have to be with bird like wings even though the wings depicted could never support in flight, the weight of the bodies they are attached to.</p>
<p>If engines and mechanical flight had been invented on earth at that time, a truer definition of these marvels would have been depicted, but sadly the myth of angels and cherubim with feathers gripped the imaginations of their primitive minds and even when man has reached the moon we still hang on to these myths.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/jul/12/religion-christianity-belief-science&amp;a=6153802&amp;rid=45ff8244-f978-46da-9250-586128bf84fa&amp;e=c0f778e36605b57ca6d8a117648d672b">Metaphysical mistake</a> (guardian.co.uk)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/45ff8244-f978-46da-9250-586128bf84fa/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=45ff8244-f978-46da-9250-586128bf84fa" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/279-angels-without-feathers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The measurement of time.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/260-the-measurement-of-time</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/260-the-measurement-of-time#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy and Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image by PhOtOnQuAnTiQuE via Flickr By Donald Swarbrick. We measure time according to our solar system but, why do we think that our time is the only time measurement in the universe, and why do we assume,every stage of events taking place out there is measured by our time? It is by us here on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em">
<div>
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/67968452@N00/1106734227"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1430/1106734227_570c3d415f_m.jpg" alt="PhotonQ-Young solar System" width="240" height="180" /></a></dt>
<dd>Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/67968452@N00/1106734227">PhOtOnQuAnTiQuE</a> via Flickr</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>By Donald Swarbrick.</p>
<p>We measure time according to our solar system but, why do we think that our time is the only time measurement in the universe, and why do we assume,every stage of events taking place out there is measured by our time?<br />
It is by us here on earth, but not necessarily by everyone in the universe.</p>
<p>We know there are enormous planets in deep space within our vision, and when we can reach even further we will discover solar systems in a very much bigger scale than ours.</p>
<p>If,life does exist on one of these massive planets,(which it will, of that I have no doubt) their time scale will be very different to ours, as it will be measured according to their solar system which, if so very much larger, will reflect a very much slower pace of time, therefore, their measurements of time and distance to other planets, and galaxies, even their lifespan itself, will be calculated in a completely different manner.</p>
<p>Our solar system, in comparison to one like that, will seem to them, like theirs in a fast forward motion, and our lifespan merely a blip in time, which of course it is, but we have never stopped to think just how insignificant our solar system is, and always assume that we are the superior race in the universe.</p>
<p>Mankind as we know it has many weaknesses, one of them being his lifespan, cut short by sickness, wars, or other disasters that can befall earth, or simply old age which in most cases lasts less than one hundred earth years. A blip in universal time.<br />
We are barely here in this form, before we are gone again, leaving our ideas, or discoveries for future generations to elaborate on, which limits the progress we make.</p>
<p>Another life form evolving in a solar system so much larger than ours, that works in a completely different way to ours, will have evolved much stronger than us, with less weaknesses to shorten their lifespan.<br />
The very fact that their time measurement is so much longer than ours will make their lifespan longer, if not eternal, as their solar system having evolved billions of years before ours would have given them time to perfect life, also given the fact that their ideas and discoveries will not have been hampered by death.</p>
<p>Another reason to believe such a planet as this would have a different time scale is, that if it used our time scale, one side of the planet would be earth years behind the other, or earth years ahead, just as we in Britain are hours behind Australia, or ahead of America, so in theirs, they will have calculated time to suit their solar system, long before time was needed on earth.</p>
<p>Now that puts the measurement of time and distance into a different prospective, which would make the universe a much smaller place for them and would enable them to travel through space without having to worry about distance.</p>
<p>If you look at the universe  through their eyes, the galaxies they, or we can see are not billions of light years away, but only a short journey away in the exceptional conveyances they will have perfected on that planet, therefore they will have reached these stars. They will be able to confirm my theories in my last post that what you are seeing out there is happening now, and not some light reflection from an event that happened light years ago.<br />
It stands to reason that the light source HAS to be there if we can still see it in a structural form, solid or gas, otherwise it would  just be light energy we would see, and we would have nothing to travel to in the case of dying stars.</p>
<p>Scientist contradict themselves by looking out at other solar systems light years away, and recognize a planet orbiting around a star, and when telling us about it lead us to believe what they have witnessed is occurring out there now, but then they try to tell us that the forming galaxies or the light from the dying star they see, happened billions of light years ago, and the event is only reaching us now.<br />
What is the point of looking out into the universe for other life forms if you think the light reflection you are looking at happened many light years ago, because according to their theories, how would we know if the promising planet that could hold life still exists, or if it died, and the light reflection of its death throes have not reached us yet?</p>
<p>If we want to unfold the mysteries of space, we have to take into consideration, that we are only a speck of dust in the universe in comparison to the enormous planets with life on them, and our life span is only a fraction of time in comparison to theirs.<br />
We have to admit our inferiority in the universe, accept that other life forms that may look the same as us, can reach us, and have reached us.<br />
That is what the bible is all about, people from another solar system being on earth.<br />
You do not have to believe the bible but you do have to admit that if such a planet exists, everything I said is possible, and given everything I have said, you have to admit that more than likely such a planet does exist.<br />
Out there in the universe, the measurement of time, and distance IS completely different, and will bring a whole new definition to our observations, and calculations that we have surmised from our lowly position in space.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/09/15/2121203/A-Galaxy-Sized-Observatory-For-Gravitational-Waves?from=rss">A Galaxy-Sized Observatory For Gravitational Waves</a> (science.slashdot.org)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090730-am-meteorite-solarsystem.html">Meteorite Dust Hints at Solar System&#8217;s Origins</a> (space.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b8fff72d-8d23-4c64-b74a-38376665bd84/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b8fff72d-8d23-4c64-b74a-38376665bd84" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/260-the-measurement-of-time/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Einstein made many observations about our solar system.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/245-einstein-made-many-observations-about-our-solar-system</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/245-einstein-made-many-observations-about-our-solar-system#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG BANG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brief History of Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speed of light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory of relativity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia Having read the book &#8220;The Bible Code&#8221; thanks to my good friend Claire from York, my conclusions are somewhat as controversial as The bible code itself. Too much time is spent discussing the same subjects,and to use a nuclear holocaust as a prediction as to how the world will end in reference [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em">
<div>
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Universe_expansion2.png"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/37/Universe_expansion2.png/300px-Universe_expansion2.png" alt="Shows slices of expansion of universe without ..." width="300" height="266" /></a></dt>
<dd>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Universe_expansion2.png">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>Having read the book &#8220;The Bible Code&#8221; thanks to my good friend Claire from York, my conclusions are somewhat as controversial as The bible code itself.</p>
<p>Too much time is spent discussing the same subjects,and to use a nuclear holocaust as a prediction as to how the world will end in reference to Armageddon in Revelation, is all too predictable for a book written in the nineteen nineties.</p>
<p>There must be enough similarities between the Hebrew version of the Bible, and the English version of the bible to show some of the so called coded predictions in each of the versions, as there cannot be too many words that do not transfer, otherwise the task would never have been achieved in the first place.<br />
Although it might not show up in the same context, there would be a way to compare the code in the given texts to show where the words arise from. Why has this not been done, and only the Hebrew version used as an example, especially when very few folk speak or understand the <a title="Hebrew language" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_language">Hebrew language</a> now.</p>
<p>If I, or someone else wrote this book now, only a decade later, I, or they, could construe the letters in the bible to tell of incidents that have already occurred, such as the &#8220;twin towers catastrophe,&#8221; as the way the letters in the Hebrew version, has no real pattern, with the words being formed from letters at random. There are a few examples that are similar, but not enough to be convincing.</p>
<p>The thing that hit me most was the fact that the writer leaves an escape route in case the predictions he made for the years after the books first publication did not come to fruition.<br />
What I mean by an escape route is, he makes a prediction, shows you the code, then gives us a reason why it might be wrong.<br />
If he was so confident that the code really was in the bible there would be no need for any doubts or excuses.</p>
<p>That is just my opinion, but it brings me to the point I wanted to make in the first place.<br />
Quantum Physics, although using certain scientific calculations, also leaves room for error, or as I have called it an escape route, to save face should their theories be proved wrong in the future.</p>
<p>Stephen Hawking&#8217;s &#8220;<a title="A Brief History of Time" rel="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Time-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553109537%3FSubscriptionId%3D0G81C5DAZ03ZR9WH9X82%26tag%3Dzemanta-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0553109537">Brief history of time</a>&#8221; is a theory, and just because it is logical, does not make it right, it has still to be proved right, and will remain a theory until proved otherwise.</p>
<p>Although Einstein made many observations about our <a title="Solar System" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_System">solar system</a>, he died leaving theories that have still to be proven today, but some of our scientist take them as fact and make important calculations using them, then IF Einstein is proved to be wrong someday their conclusions from these calculations will be wrong also.<br />
&#8220;The distinction between past present and future is only an illusion&#8221; is one of Einstein&#8217;s theories, also the one that made him famous, is obvious by its name &#8220;THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY&#8221; theory being the operative word.</p>
<p>How many calculations have been made from &#8220;The <a title="Theory of relativity" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity">theory of relativity</a>&#8221; and it has still to be proved to be correct?<br />
If it ever comes to light (nice pun) that this theory on the <a title="Speed of light" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light">speed of light</a> is wrong, which I am not suggesting IS wrong, then all the calculations will be wrong.<br />
What I am suggesting though, is the assumption that as light travels through space the images we see from our telescopes on earth, means that the source of the light we are looking at happened so many light years ago.</p>
<p>We are misusing Einstein&#8217;s theory, omitting the fact that you need the source of the light to still be active in its visual form, if it is being sighted as such.</p>
<p>Light does travel, and light, and the energy emitted from other galaxies reaches earth, and as it travels it widens and disperses throughout the parts of the universe it travels through, introducing the energy back into the universe.<br />
The image of the source of the light, or the object itself, does not travel through the universe, only it&#8217;s light and energy, WE are reaching out to that image, therefore the source is still active.</p>
<p>If you take away the source of the light then you just have the light, and energy from that source travelling through space without form, and no visual sighting of the now defunct planet or galaxy.</p>
<p>The idea that what Hubble is seeing as it reaches farther out in space, is planets and galaxies that were formed at the beginning of the universe just after the &#8220;<a title="Big Bang" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang">big bang</a>&#8221; and that the light reflected in Hubble&#8217;s mirror are events that took place then, is a wrong assumption, simply because as I said, &#8220;you need the source to be still active to be able to see the image&#8221;</p>
<p>Proof of this is the fact that Hubble is getting closer images of these forming galaxies, and dieing stars and the image remains the same, no matter how close a picture it takes.<br />
If my theory was wrong, it would mean that when Hubble &#8216;s closer images came through there would be changes to that image even though it is only magnified.<br />
What I am trying to relate is, the closer Hubble gets, the less light years there are between images, therefore the image should change, but it does not, because the source of light is still there, what Hubble is seeing now, is happening now, and until that realization hits the scientists who hope to view events from the big bang, then they will make wrong assumptions, and calculations.<br />
I have touched on this subject before, and my theory is, &#8220;you need the source of the light to be active in solid form to project the images we are now recieving from hubble, therefore these Galaxies are forming now, and the dieing stars are still in the process of dieing&#8221;<br />
If I am wrong, and we could span all those light years, at what point would we go through the image of a dieing star and reach the void, or the image of the forming Galaxy to reach it fully formed and in working order, and why would the light energy from a dead star reflect as we see it and not disperse as light energy throughout space, as light does?</p>
<p>It only takes one factual discovery to blow a theory right out of the water, and it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time it happened in science.</p>
<p>Which brings me to my next post &#8220;TIME&#8221; and the way we measure it, and its relevance to this post, but as I say &#8220;that is for next week.&#8221;</p>
<p> </p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5247705/why-we-need-to-reach-the-stars-and-we-will">Why We Need to Reach the Stars (and We Will) [Space]</a> (gizmodo.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/0244b264-6e85-4689-9376-9ef5855a4e49/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=0244b264-6e85-4689-9376-9ef5855a4e49" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/245-einstein-made-many-observations-about-our-solar-system/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miracles, heavens advanced knowledge.</title>
		<link>http://thephilosopherschair.com/231-miracles-heavens-advanced-knowledge</link>
		<comments>http://thephilosopherschair.com/231-miracles-heavens-advanced-knowledge#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DonaldSwarbrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donald's Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immaculate Conception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nativity of Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephilosopherschair.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia By Donald Swarbrick It is easy to see why certain events, recorded in the bible were classed as miracles when the people who witnessed, and recorded them were so primitive in their ways compared to now. If you take one of the most important ones, that had the biggest impact on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em">
<div>
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Juan_de_Flandes_001.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Juan_de_Flandes_001.jpg/300px-Juan_de_Flandes_001.jpg" alt="Resurrection of Lazarus by Juan de Flandes, ar..." width="300" height="419" /></a></dt>
<dd>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Juan_de_Flandes_001.jpg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>By Donald Swarbrick</p>
<p>It is easy to see why certain events, recorded in the bible were classed as <a class="zem_slink" title="Miracle" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle">miracles</a> when the people who witnessed, and recorded them were so primitive in their ways compared to now.</p>
<p>If you take one of the most important ones, that had the biggest impact on the world, and is still marveled at today, with the outcome being worshiped around the world, then look at it with the knowledge we have today, you have to see that it was no miracle, only a medical operation that is carried out on a regular basis on earth now.</p>
<p><a class="zem_slink" title="Artificial insemination" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_insemination">Artificial insemination</a> is carried out everyday around the world with childless couples given help to conceive, and the method is such, that even though the woman has never had sex, she could still give birth to a child.</p>
<p>If the <a class="zem_slink" title="Mary (mother of Jesus)" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_%28mother_of_Jesus%29">virgin Mary</a>&#8216;s <a class="zem_slink" title="Immaculate Conception" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate_Conception">immaculate conception</a> had been carried out today, the world would not think much about it, and certainly not worship her, or the child she bore, as the process she went through to become pregnant would be understood by the people.</p>
<p>Even now, when we know how this virgin birth could have come about, some still think of it as a miracle, performed by God to bring a son into the world who was without sin. The sin supposedly being the act of sex, but could the words &#8220;without sin&#8221; not just mean, because God&#8217;s sperm might have been used, his son, like him would be &#8220;without sin?&#8221;</p>
<p>The holiness came from the deed of artificial insemination, carried out by a people who were here 2,000 years ago, and had a knowledge so far in advance of us that they knew how to perform this operation then, which would be no big deal to them given the fact that they travelled through space to get here.</p>
<p>Yes, we would still worship the son that was born, because he was the son of God, a vastly more intelligent man from another planet, but would we still worship the mother, as she was only a normal person from earth?</p>
<p>That means that Jesus was born of an earth woman who was made pregnant by sperm donated by a man from heaven, which makes Jesus partly of this earth and partly of another planet, and the only holiness in him was his father, who being so powerful, brough so much exaltation to the world, the people chose to worship him, and everyone involved in the conception.</p>
<p>Nothing holy, just a feat of <a class="zem_slink" title="Medicine" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicine">medical science</a>.</p>
<p><a class="zem_slink" title="Lazarus" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazarus">Lazarus</a> was brought back from the dead by Jesus, and Jesus himself came back from the dead, who must have been taught how to use this medical science for the benefit of those who they thought needed it most.</p>
<p>People are brought back from the dead now, although not after such a time dead as Lazarus was, but as our knowledge improves, who is to say that we cannot achieve this in the future.</p>
<p><a class="zem_slink" title="Immortality" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortality">Everlasting life</a> is promised by God, and he would not have made that promise if he could not attain his goal, and by bringing Lazerus back from the dead, gave us further proof that medical achievements were at such an advanced stage among the heavenly people, and that this promise could be kept.</p>
<p>Healing the sick was a way for Jesus to convince the people of this earth just how powerful the heavenly people were, while carying out feats like, giving sight to the blind man, healing the leper, making the crippled man walk, all of which can be performed in todays world, although maybe not as fast or efficiently as them. YET!</p>
<p>Turning the water into wine is one of the so called miracles lots of people would like to achieve, and I am sure it will be possible one day with dried powdered grapes being used, or some similar method.</p>
<p>The five loaves and two fish, feeding the five thousand is a trick we will need to learn, as the population of the world increases, putting food stocks at risk, incase nature does not take its course and cull the people of the world, as it has in the past.</p>
<p>If and when you read your bible again, think of the deeds that were classed as miracles then, and count how many are achievable now, and how near we are to performing other tasks that would have been classed as miracles then.</p>
<p>It baffles me why, as each step forward mankind takes, most people on earth would still rather believe in the mystique of God and the bible, never wanting to relate our progress to us catching up on a people who are so far in advance of us that they can travel here through space, perform all kinds of deeds that are so outwith our capabilities.</p>
<p>Its OK believing in God, but why hold the ghostly, mystical images they have been brainwashed into believing, instead of realizing, God was no mystical being, he is just an ordinary person who was lucky enough to have originated on a planet that evolved long before earth, giving its people time to achieve the perfect life, the life they have on heaven, for all eternity.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/20717a92-1def-41a8-98b0-779b565fbe27/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=20717a92-1def-41a8-98b0-779b565fbe27" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thephilosopherschair.com/231-miracles-heavens-advanced-knowledge/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
